Breaking....CNN has Was. Posts writers on now..

[busterbrown]

Answered Mc Master’s false comments immediately...

[Demtexan]

1. Is McMaster trying to save himself.

Or expose Trump.

I am on the road with no tv around.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

2. Tweety's next guest is Pat Buchanan. I switched back to CNN.

Why would he want to interview that old fascist?

[OldHippieChick]

3. I'll watch Bucky until I start to wretch and

report back so you can watch CNN and report back.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

5. Thanks!

[OldHippieChick]

14. Bucky said nothing of substance and tried lamely to

defend the Tangerine Toddler. Blah, blah, blah, no evidence of collusion, blah, blah

[chelsea0011]

10. Message deleted by DU the Administrators

[lindysalsagal]

4. CNN taking a much more intelligent, serious and sober response than msnbc to the potus leak.

And to think, he's always bloviating about "who leaked the info?" Well, asshat, it was YOU.

[hedda_foil]

6. Burnett has an excellent panel on CNN.

[nycbos]

7. McMaster's statement wasn't technically false.

He said "no sources and methods were discussed" the report in The Washington Post never alleged the sources and methods were discussed.

He revealed the information in away the they can figure out.

While it is just as serious the General's statement wasn't technically wrong.



BUT HER EMAILS

[defacto7]

11. He revealed the information in away the they can figure out.

Trump is the last person I would consider to be able to speak cryptically. He's about as opaque as a shell game with champagne glasses.

[nycbos]

12. That is what I meant.

It would be easy for them to figure it out.


His statement is not technically false was my point.

On a side note I don't want to hear about emails again.

[defacto7]

13. I agree with you..

I was just making a silly analogy.

[lindysalsagal]

8. "this is indefensible. No one will defend him on this."

Right, you are.

[Amaryllis]

9. Fox will. Hannity will.