Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The new, Nixonian defense: If the president does it, then it is not inappropriate. (Original Post)
kpete
May 2017
OP
"We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the word
dalton99a
May 2017
#1
dalton99a
(92,835 posts)1. "We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the word
'confidential.'"
- Trump, Sept. 2016
lapfog_1
(31,773 posts)2. Well, thats the problem
This intel report was marked "Top Secret" "Code Word" "Eyes Only" and not "Confidential (C)" which Trump would have recognized.
Iggo
(49,752 posts)3. Pretty sure John Yoo agrees. (n/t)
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)4. Then what was the fucking point of denying it?

