General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuick Reaction to McMaster's Presser - Josh Marshall
Published MAY 16, 2017 12:15 PM
We were just watching General McMasters press conference which has taken the place of Sean Spicers briefing today. The key take away is that McMaster is essentially conceding the accuracy of last nights reporting (first from the Post and later confirmed by other outlets) but saying that in the context it was okay. It was appropriate. Notably, when it comes to specifics, he is hiding behind classification to refuse to give further answers.
He also conceded that President Trump made the decision to reveal the information in the spur of the moment. When asked when Trump made the decision and whether his advisors were part of that decision, here are the exact words of response: He made the decision in the context of the conversation. In other words, spur of the moment decision, not something he and his advisers decided made sense in advance.
The gist here is that McMaster is saying yes Trump did it. He was entitled to do it. And I and other advisors were there when it happened and believe that substantively it was the right decision. Later McMaster went further in denying a key point that no one from the White House had yet, so far as I know, denied. McMaster insisted that the President in no way compromised any sources and methods.
(For future purposes, I would say that is the clearest statement from McMaster that well likely look back on as a knowing falsehood, with no give in the words as spoken.)
Then there was a key revelation just before McMaster left the podium.
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/quick-reaction-to-mcmasters-presser
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)impeached by both parties, no discussion.
No discussion.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)At the end of the day, you either have integrity or you don't.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)As the WP story pointed out, once DT spilt the beans to his puppet masters, WH aides were SCRAMBLING to notify intelligence agencies that he had leak some sensitive info and that allies and agents were at risk
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)If bragging about code word only intel is no biggie, why delete that part from the permanent record?
And why sneak the Russian ambassador into the Oval and not tell the American press about it?
If not for the Russian Gov't. "photographer," we wouldn't even know he was there.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)with a different spin, intentional distraction, all Republican created and driven:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029071992
Link to tweet