General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoly ****: This statement from McMaster's former deputy
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/16/mcmasters-former-deputy-in-iraq-an-officer-must-not-just-stand-by-while-a-lie-is-being-promulgated/The byline of the entire piece is Thomas Ricks, but the quoted segment is from Paul Yingling, McMaster's last deputy in Iraq:
I havent anything to say to you regarding HR. He is my friend and my advice to friends is private. However, I would like to clarify a point regarding the honor code of the officer corps.
An officer may not tolerate a lie.
It is not enough that everything an officer says is true. This standard is too low; it allows an officer to omit facts that are relevant to the matter at hand.
It is not enough that everything an officer says is true and complete. This standard is too low; it allows an officer to remain silent while others lie.
An officer may not tolerate a lie. This standard requires not only that everything an officer says is true and complete, but also that an officer must correct anyone who lies in his or her presence. An officer can never be content with a half truth when the whole can be won.
A minor example illustrates this point. Prior to my retirement, my chain of command insisted that I have a public retirement ceremony. Such a ceremony would include the public reading of an award citation stating that the secretary of the Army valued my service. I informed my chain of command that if they read such a statement in my presence, I would be obliged to correct the record. They cancelled the ceremony.
You are welcome to use this statement in its entirety, attributable to me by name.
An officer may not tolerate a lie.
Regards,
Paul
furtheradu
(1,865 posts)THAT, my Friends, is a Patriot.THAT is ETHICS.. MORALITY. Simple, yet profound.
THAT is what I expect of mySelf, my Family & Friends, any one in my life.. & our Nation's leaders.
I usually say "no tolerance for bs".
Thanks for this post!
iluvtennis
(19,849 posts)dalton99a
(81,451 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,253 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)and thought his mission in life was to save the Middle East (for Jesus).
So...
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)bdjhawk
(420 posts)2. What was the lie in the award citation? That the Sec of the Army really didn't value his service? What is the story behind this? Is this a jab at an Obama appointed Sec of the Army? Looks like he retired in 2012.
Regardless, I appreciate the absolute clarity he provides regarding the standards an officer should meet.
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)Aviation Pro
(12,150 posts)....emblazoned on the first day of OCS and one of my guiding principles for the past 34 years:
"An officer will not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those that do."
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)airmid
(500 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)It works for tRump with McMaster. Maybe they don't like it, but there is a chain of command that ends with the president. They suck it up and tell those lies anyway.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)Any officer supporting the current leaker in chief is not honorable enough to receive my thanks.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Anthrax, WMDs, babies ripped from incubators, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin and even the release of the Iranian hostages. etc, etc.
All they do is lie and the morons buy.
We are really a stupid country!
herding cats
(19,564 posts)There's some truth there he wants out in the open quite seriously.