General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Democrats reject Lieberman for FBI director
By BURGESS EVERETT and SEUNG MIN KIM 05/18/2017 06:18 PM EDT
President Donald Trump may be dramatically miscalculating how much support Sen. Joe Lieberman has among his former Democratic colleagues to become FBI director.
Some Senate Democrats hold a grudge against Lieberman for his rightward turn and opposition to some of President Barack Obama's agenda late in his Senate career. Others say even though they respect Lieberman, the FBI director should not be a former politician. And all Democratic senators interviewed for this story said the former Connecticut senator lacks the kind of experience needed for the post.
Republicans are lining up behind Lieberman, who left the Senate in 2013 after four terms. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) called him a "person of unquestioned integrity and that's what we need." Added Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who has spoken to Lieberman about the job: "If the president picked Joe Lieberman hed be doing [the] country a good service and I think the FBI a good service."But Republicans seem to be overstating Lieberman's Democratic support. Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) predicted Lieberman would get 100 votes, a near impossibility.
But Liebermans relationship with Democrats is damaged. After he left office, he urged senators in his own party to reject Obamas nuclear deal with Iran, infuriating Democrats. And his relationship with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Graham the trio were known as the three amigos tilted the Senate in a more hawkish direction during the first four years of Obamas presidency. In 2008, Lieberman endorsed McCain over Obama for president.http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/18/joe-lieberman-fbi-director-senate-democrats-238570
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Rumply moralizing right-wing fucko.
If it were a blowjob between two consenting adults, I'm sure ol' Joe-mentum would be all over it in terms of breathy outrage.
onit2day
(1,201 posts)He is not really a democrat but a member of the tainted trio of war mongers. He has no experience or qualifications for the job of FBI director except he is easily controlled by the cons. He has a perverted sense of justice since he is incapable of relating to anyone who is not wealthy.
calimary
(81,103 posts)ticket. Eight years after Gore/Lieberman, there he is at the republi-CON convention, addressing them as their keynote speaker, endorsing John McCain over Barack Obama. And when he ran for reelection to the Senate in 2006, he was primaried, but then abandoned his party to go independent. He won another term, but by then he was starting to show so many more leanings toward the CONS that he gave it up by 2012 - when he proved extremely unpopular with his Connecticut Democratic constituents. That's why we've since had the terrific Chris Murphy in that seat, thank goodness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman
He always claimed it was for the good of the country, but he just started leaning too far to the wrong end of the spectrum, and I'm not surprised his service in the Senate didn't last. But when he made that speech at that convention, and sided with the GOP nominee over the party that supported him, continued to open its doors to him after he spurned them, and sought to bestow the vice presidency upon him, that was certainly it for me. He seemed to morph into a public servant who cared more about himself staying in power than about his constituents. I worked hard to support the Gore/Lieberman ticket. Put my faith in him as well as in Al Gore. And I eventually found I could not ever trust him again. Evidently that's what the voters in Connecticut thought, too.
An elephant isn't the only creature that never forgets.
sandensea
(21,596 posts)Traitor Joe.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)onit2day
(1,201 posts)Believes 144K Jews must convert to Christianity for Jesus to return to Jerusalem. He's a whack job. Trump always picks the worst person for the job. Always
SharonAnn
(13,771 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Chemisse
(30,803 posts)There is no way he is or could be objective. He is slime.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And Trump thinks the party Holy Joe screwed over would let him have a job where he can launch "investigations" and "Comey" our nominee right before the NEXT election)?
Me.
(35,454 posts)They'd do their homework. They thought Dems would get behind the Comey firing, now they misjudge this.
mopinko
(69,990 posts)that no senator would vote against another senator.
wrongo.
Me.
(35,454 posts)One or 2 questions would've revealed that he's regarded as a turncoat
MyOwnPeace
(16,917 posts)have enough experience or clues to have ANY IDEA of what they should do next!
They are tied-up hound dogs that have finally been cut free and are running at - well, they have NO CLUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)So that if the Dems reject Lie-berman, the GOP can counter all the bad press the GOP has that it is in disarray and say "See how the Democrats can't even support a pick even if its from one of their own ranks!". And if he gets appointed they will double down and use this every time Joe comes out and says "nothing to see here folks" for his law firms client Trump, which is very possible. They will say "look how unwilling to compromise the Democrats are, they can't even come together for support for one of their recent colleagues and one-time Democratic VP nominee"
mopinko
(69,990 posts)but fershrisakes, the guy is 75. he is gonna serve till he is 85? please.
and the only way this comes in out of left field is because he is a trumpster.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)eleny
(46,166 posts)rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)Lieberman is 75. He would be at least 85 at the end of a ten year term.
So again I ask WTF?
hatrack
(59,574 posts)Lieberman. Jesus Christ on a pogo stick.
vanlassie
(5,663 posts)With this whiny voice... who was that?
MyOwnPeace
(16,917 posts)Can you imagine what Jon Stewart would be doing with all of this?
Between Joe Lieberman, Lindsay Graham, Kelly, Spicer, and, of course, Cheeto himself, I'd be up past 1:00 AM every night, still laughing!
vanlassie
(5,663 posts)vanlassie
(5,663 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,345 posts)Stole that from somewhere, don't know where. Spot on.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)vanlassie
(5,663 posts)Beat me, barely!
Salviati
(6,008 posts)ThoughtProvoker
(32 posts)I had realized he had taken such a turn right lately. Interesting.
tblue37
(65,217 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts)larwdem
(758 posts)both are traitors
Phoenix61
(16,992 posts)He is not even close to being a good option.
Goodheart
(5,308 posts)And, of course, you can give yourself an easy answer: this is one of those deals... just like the Comey firing... where he's stupid enough to believe that Democrats will fall for his self-serving maneuvers. If Lieberman is nominated he's tainted, it's as simple as that.
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)MedusaX
(1,129 posts)It isn't as if his law firm has Trump as a client ...
Oh, wait... it is exactly like that...
https://qz.com/987062/donald-trumps-top-pick-for-fbi-director-joe-lieberman-works-for-a-law-firm-that-represents-trump/
flotsam
(3,268 posts)During debate on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as the crucial 60th vote needed to pass the legislation, Lieberman's opposition to the public option was critical for its removal from the resulting bill.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman
MurrayDelph
(5,292 posts)His wife works for a healthcare logging firm. A public option would have cost them (and him) money.
yardwork
(61,538 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)Leghorn21
(13,522 posts)@morninggloria
a sentence that begins "joe lieberman emerges" should finish with the phrase "from bog" or "from pile of old tires." *not* "as frontrunner"
@mtracey
In a time of such division and turmoil it's heartening to know that we can all still unite in disdain for Joe Lieberman.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)I can't stand the man. When I heard he was being considered, I could not believe it. When Trump said he was the preferred candidate, I couldn't help but think he could not have made a worse choice. Now that I have said that, I am sure he will dig up someone worse....
Sam
irisblue
(32,928 posts)was pretty clear he would be a no vote. WTG!
tiptonic
(765 posts)He was a mole for the republicans, his entire career. Enough said..
Cha
(296,811 posts)ridiculous. Wth would he know about it?
VigilantG
(374 posts)MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)in the house derailed any shot at single payer in the house...what Lieberman did was stop medicare for those above 50 or 55 which is bad enough...it would have made a big difference in premiums to have those folks under Medicare...he is a tool. But we have no power...those who couldn't abide 'emails' have left us in this predicament.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)I don't see how we can stop him though if Trump wants this...and Lieberman will be Trump's guy in the FBI.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)they are united are wrong. My worry is that Lieberman is not up to the job in terms of terrorism...putting aside the Trump investigation. The fact that Lieberman works in a firm with lawyers who represent Trump is not good.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)guilty of foreign espionage, maybe treason.
Obviously.
So whoever he picks is either easily willing to sell his soul or not. Joe is a complete ass, but not sure if he would sell his soul to this narcissist child.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)them whether they are willing to support espionage/teason/election fraud, or even worse.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Pick. Gulianni is much more aggressive
Lieb will follow orders. He is not qualified or capable though. BFF w McCain.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)AG does not cut it for an agency like the FBI...we need law enforcement. Consider terrorism...I can't imagine that Lieberman could handle that...but I don't see any way to stop the GOP from putting him in as FBI director.
WoonTars
(694 posts)...
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)we are out of power... we can make him illegitimate and watch him like a hawk...for he surely will attempt to save Trump.
JI7
(89,239 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)against his primary opponent...looking at you Boxer.
Panich52
(5,829 posts)Lieberman. Certainly not a word I'd use to describe the DINO.
Lucky Luciano
(11,248 posts)mark fromelko
(59 posts)Eff off, Joe!
onecent
(6,096 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)Trump will pick him, suits the goal of undermining head of every agency