Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
Tue May 23, 2017, 09:27 AM May 2017

Normalizing W: an awful case of "both parties are the same" in the NYT

From Digby's Hullabaoo blog:

"But normalizing W - and by extension, the hideous caricature of an American political party that is the modern GOP - appears to be inevitable. Let's not mince words here:

What Posner and Bazelon wrote below is as Orwellian a lie as anything coming from Trump's mouth:

'Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama flexed their executive muscles. Mr. Bush enhanced the president’s control over national security after the Sept. 11 attacks by opening Guantánamo, trying terrorism suspects before military tribunals, and authorizing warrantless wiretapping. Mr. Obama took unilateral aggressive actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reform immigration.

'They left the office stronger than when they arrived. Although their policies were controversial, both presidents were given deference because they made their judgments conscientiously and led the government professionally.'

Bush is now conscientious. The president who famously refused to pay attention to a memo that was entitled "bin Laden Determined to Attack US" in the month before 9/11.

Bush is now professional. The president who praised the incompetent Michael Brown during Katrina with ""Brownie, "you're doing a heckuva job.""
...
http://digbysblog.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/normalizing-w-by-tristero.html

And they try to liken all that arrogance, cutting of civil rights, support of torture to environmental protection and more humane treatment of immigrants. Notice which actions get the positive word of "enhanced", and which were "aggressive"!

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Normalizing W: an awful case of "both parties are the same" in the NYT (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler May 2017 OP
It's insidious. They are insidious. KPN May 2017 #1

KPN

(15,643 posts)
1. It's insidious. They are insidious.
Tue May 23, 2017, 09:59 AM
May 2017

As far as I'm concerned, they are our -- the people's -- enemy, and about half of us don't recognize and know that. Sad and scary.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Normalizing W: an awful c...