Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,739 posts)
Tue May 23, 2017, 09:22 PM May 2017

White House twists bombshell testimony about Russiacontacts

During a House Intelligence Committee Hearing on Tuesday, former CIA Director John Brennan said the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s connections with Russia is “well founded.” He cited “information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals” as evidence.

As Daily Beast editor Justin Miller pointed out, Brennan’s testimony represents the first time a U.S. official has publicly said they have direct knowledge of communications between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Brennan didn’t come out and detail evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. He explained during the hearing the evidence is classified information and not appropriate to discuss a public setting.

Nonetheless, after the hearing, the White House tried to spin Brennan’s testimony as inconsequential. The administration that has routinely decried the use of unnamed sources in media reports sent a statement “attributable to a White House spokesman” to Politico’s Edward Isaac-Dovere that said, “This morning’s hearings back up what we’ve been saying all along: that despite a year of investigation, there is still no evidence of any Russia-Trump campaign collusion.”

The hearing, however, didn’t back that up at all. By not disclosing details during Tuesday’s hearing, Brennan was just trying to protect classified information.

Brennan made clear that the communications he was referring to were concerning. He said that when when he left the CIA upon Trump’s inauguration, he “had unresolved questions in my mind about whether or not the Russians had been successful in getting U.S. persons, involved in the campaign or not, to work on their behalf, again, either in a witting or unwitting fashion.”

https://thinkprogress.org/white-house-downplays-trump-russia-testimony-by-twisting-cia-brennan-words-912770540f81

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House twists bombshell testimony about Russiacontacts (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 OP
K & R..& thanks! furtheradu May 2017 #1
The Republican game ProudLib72 May 2017 #2
Thus the return of Bannon and Preibus to DC. Not that they are directly involved but would monmouth4 May 2017 #3
And maybe were involved in Mme. Defarge May 2017 #4
An R Congressman from Utah just misleadingly said spooky3 May 2017 #5

monmouth4

(9,686 posts)
3. Thus the return of Bannon and Preibus to DC. Not that they are directly involved but would
Tue May 23, 2017, 09:31 PM
May 2017

contribute to the push-back that is in the future. Of course IMO..

spooky3

(34,405 posts)
5. An R Congressman from Utah just misleadingly said
Wed May 24, 2017, 12:03 AM
May 2017

Brennan had said there was "no direct evidence."

That's not at all what Brennan said.

This was alleged on Brian Williams' show.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House twists bombsh...