Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Augiedog

(2,545 posts)
Thu May 25, 2017, 08:16 AM May 2017

So if the Guardian reporter had grabbed Gianforte by the neck and slammed him to the ground

would the result be a misdemeanor assault charge? Nah....a republican billionaire congressman? It would be a terrorist attack and the national guard would be mobilized. The reporter would be disappeared to Guantanamo, never to be seen or heard from again.

This behavior is what I call "right wing privilege", that being the perception that these pricks can do as they please, especially when they hold government positions that they see as their property. Think of the Orange Anus and his declaration that he could shoot someone in Times Square and suffer no consequences.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So if the Guardian reporter had grabbed Gianforte by the neck and slammed him to the ground (Original Post) Augiedog May 2017 OP
Actually, in Montana, yes. The way the laws are in LiberalLoner May 2017 #1
I don't think it would make much difference what he was charged with, justhanginon May 2017 #2

LiberalLoner

(9,761 posts)
1. Actually, in Montana, yes. The way the laws are in
Thu May 25, 2017, 08:24 AM
May 2017

My home state, serious bodily injury (broken bones, etc.) has to occur before it is considered a felony charge. Don't agree with the law, but that's how it is.

justhanginon

(3,289 posts)
2. I don't think it would make much difference what he was charged with,
Thu May 25, 2017, 08:38 AM
May 2017

he is a wealthy republican. Over and over again we have seen that very rarely are there any electoral repercussions for bad personal behavior. What sane voters regard as disqualifying behavior by a candidate is evidently considered a plus or at least neutral by their supporters. They make their feeble excuses and they continue their support.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So if the Guardian report...