Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
Thu May 25, 2017, 06:15 PM May 2017

A Smarter Way to Interpret 2017's Special Elections from Cook Report

I dunno if this system is perfect, but it is a good framework to start with when thinking about Dem chances for a House majority in 2018.


http://cookpolitical.com/story/10363

The results of individual special elections, like Thursday's in Montana between Democrat Rob Quist and Republican Greg Gianforte, can't always foretell what will happen in the next high-stakes midterm. Each district presents its own unique set of variables, like flawed candidates or dreadfully unpopular governors.

But taken collectively, the margins in specials can tell us a good deal about the political environment — and so far, it's looking really bad for Republicans.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Smarter Way to Interpret 2017's Special Elections from Cook Report (Original Post) wildeyed May 2017 OP
Thanks very interesting Demsrule86 May 2017 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Smarter Way to Interpre...