RT thinks that human rights don't matter when it comes to fighting terrorism
Just look at the loaded questions:
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/389699-philippines-isis-martial-law/
RT: With terrorism as his new target, do you think Duterte will receive much international support, given that his war on drugs was condemned by many and called too brutal?
...
RT: With terrorism apparently spreading around the world, don't you think Duterte-style harsh measures should be an option now?
...
RT: Human Rights Watch (HRW) has already called on Duterte to ensure the rights of civilians would be protected under the law. Do you think the watchdog is being subjective? Would it happen with any other country?
-----------
Oh, the evil american empire, waging endless wars! But trying to protect innocents while fighting terrorism is such a ridiculous concept...
Don't read the comment-section. For the sake of your own sanity, don't. RT is not being written for ordinary people. It's a publication catering to the very people you see there.
A call to found a kurdish state gets censored (have seen it myself). But endless posts about how the dirty Jews control everything, that never gets censored. BECAUSE RT DOESN'T WANT THIS KIND OF READERS TO LEAVE.
= new reply since forum marked as read
