Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussians implied a deal: drop sanctions & Russian banks can lend to people with Trump ties
:largehttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-oligarch-idUSKBN18N02W
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 4391 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russians implied a deal: drop sanctions & Russian banks can lend to people with Trump ties (Original Post)
kpete
May 2017
OP
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)1. Pay for play. Oh, that's right, that was HRC.
Whatever drumpf accused HRC of doing, he was actually doing a thousand fold.
dalton99a
(81,635 posts)2. Follow the money.
BTW:
Squinch
(51,026 posts)3. If this is true, it's pretty much the smoking gun. But the source of this sounds a little fuzzy:
"Russian with ties to former Trump aide."
They need to nail this down to within an inch of their lives before they go forward. I could see Russian guys planting a story that was close to the real story to immunize the real story.
I fear they are very good at this stuff, and we are babes in the woods.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)4. A quid pro quo?
Hmmmm.