Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Sun May 28, 2017, 07:31 AM May 2017

Anyone have thoughts on the Evergreen State College situation?

Here are some articles from the college newspaper:

Protest Prompts Changes at Evergreen
http://www.cooperpointjournal.com/2017/05/27/protest-prompts-changes-at-evergreen-students-say-the-fight-against-racism-on-campus-continues/

Complete List of Student Demands
http://www.cooperpointjournal.com/2017/05/27/complete-list-of-student-demands/

George Bridges Statement in Response to Student Demands
http://www.cooperpointjournal.com/2017/05/27/george-bridges-statement-in-response-to-student-demands-delivered-in-the-longhouse-on-friday-may-26/

Here's a bit from WaPo:

‘Professor told he’s not safe on campus after college protests’ at Evergreen State College (Washington)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/05/26/professor-told-hes-not-safe-on-campus-after-college-protests-at-evergreen-state-university-washington/?utm_term=.aa75ca11ff4c

Here's the prof's twitter:
https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein

If anyone has been following this and has thoughts or insights, I'd be very interested to hear them.

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone have thoughts on the Evergreen State College situation? (Original Post) oberliner May 2017 OP
It appears to be a pile of stupid. Loki Liesmith May 2017 #1
Yeah, that is my initial take as well oberliner May 2017 #3
Agree 100%. This is how 45 is empowered, and (perhaps) gets another term. pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #45
why in gawds name was Evergreen represented on FOX news? on TUCKER? Thats enough there... samnsara May 2017 #2
Well, the story does fit into the Fox News narrative about "liberal PC culture" oberliner May 2017 #4
Because Fox News is hyping the recent Campus Maoism issue Loki Liesmith May 2017 #5
The President rolled over exboyfil May 2017 #13
That's Tucker MO NobodyHere May 2017 #14
I think we (those who are liberally minded) need to call out students/group who behave like this xor May 2017 #15
That's what's so sick! Weinstein is a liberal. pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #50
Republicans who think Fox is too liberal, will only watch Tucker and the weather womanofthehills Jun 2017 #21
Foxes MO too. Show the crazy ones. For debates, get weak debaters fot the Dems. The NRA is singing Alice11111 Aug 2017 #53
Easy. By default. MSNBC and the rest of MSM *runs* from stories like this. pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #49
Interesting reading. I was not familiar with this. NCTraveler May 2017 #6
Thanks for sharing your insights oberliner May 2017 #9
I know what to make of his twitter kcr Jun 2017 #35
I have not been following... Mike Nelson May 2017 #7
Thanks oberliner May 2017 #8
I'd not heard of this story. cwydro May 2017 #10
It would nice if the identity of the woman exboyfil May 2017 #12
I agree. cwydro Jun 2017 #33
I think it is garbage and the administration should have brought the hammer down exboyfil May 2017 #11
There's been a lot of false reporting on this story caraher Jun 2017 #16
That's why I provided links to primary source materials oberliner Jun 2017 #17
Great to see another thread on this. romanic Jun 2017 #18
What is your take on the situation? oberliner Jun 2017 #19
Pretty similar to what I thought of Mizzou a couple years back. romanic Jun 2017 #20
It's not just the students. Dr. Strange Jun 2017 #22
I think this is where I land. Lord_at_War Jun 2017 #34
+ 1,000 NT pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #46
It looks to me like there's a lot of aggressive action and ungenerous listening across the board. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2017 #23
I'm sickened by the treatment of this professor. grossproffit Jun 2017 #24
Bridges is over a barrel ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #25
How about the send the asshole students away Jake Stern Jun 2017 #32
After reading his responses I don't see where he did anything wrong Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #36
I think the students have legitimate concerns, given how bold QC Jun 2017 #26
Weinstein sounds like an asshole. kwassa Jun 2017 #27
What makes him sound that way? oberliner Jun 2017 #31
Wouldn't be the first time he's been called that. Dr. Strange Jun 2017 #43
"Sounds" like an asshole?!?! pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #47
They need to make examples of a few by expelling them MichMan Jun 2017 #28
The right is correctly pointing out that we're eating ourselves. pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #48
Looks like the campus is closed again Monday, due to threats, after similar threats petronius Jun 2017 #29
I used to live not too far from there customerserviceguy Jun 2017 #30
My first thought was "where are the trustees?" Yupster Jun 2017 #37
What's the incident that prompted the protests? I feel like there's some information missing here. Initech Jun 2017 #38
Was it the professor's e-mail protesting the event Yupster Jun 2017 #39
Sounds like bullshit reasons were discovered to be offended, and goofy demands are now being made. jmg257 Jun 2017 #40
I read through the list of demands and my first reaction was Yupster Jun 2017 #41
And now these protestors are carrying bats around campus. romanic Jun 2017 #42
Did any of these "students" take communication classes? alp227 Jun 2017 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #51
The students are/were punks. pablo_marmol Aug 2017 #52

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
1. It appears to be a pile of stupid.
Sun May 28, 2017, 07:42 AM
May 2017

A show put on by students who would have fit in well with a Maoist struggle session.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
3. Yeah, that is my initial take as well
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:07 AM
May 2017

But I am just now trying to read up more to get a fuller understanding of the situation.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
45. Agree 100%. This is how 45 is empowered, and (perhaps) gets another term.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 02:16 AM
Aug 2017

I've researched this thoroughly. Students are behaving like psychotic babies, while even DU members are lying about Weinstein.

samnsara

(17,600 posts)
2. why in gawds name was Evergreen represented on FOX news? on TUCKER? Thats enough there...
Sun May 28, 2017, 07:58 AM
May 2017

...to make them protest. This is Evergreen.. not WSU or UW....

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
4. Well, the story does fit into the Fox News narrative about "liberal PC culture"
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:09 AM
May 2017

And, also, it's a good distraction from the more important Russia-Trump news.

But, that aside, I think the professor is being treated unfairly, based on what I know so far. And I think some of the students are being ridiculous (also based on what I know so far).

I am open to other insights.

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
5. Because Fox News is hyping the recent Campus Maoism issue
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:12 AM
May 2017

They may be overplaying it but the students *are* acting just like Maoists shaming "counter-revolutionary" colleagues.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
13. The President rolled over
Wed May 31, 2017, 10:44 AM
May 2017

It is a repeat of the Missouri and Yale fiascos. I am sure parents are taking note when deciding where to send the tuition checks.

If I was the President, at a minimum, I would demand an apology from the crowd who harassed and even threatened the professor. Also the matter of holding him and others and barricading the entrances - that is a matter for law enforcement (and expulsions as far as I am concerned).

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
14. That's Tucker MO
Wed May 31, 2017, 10:51 AM
May 2017

He brings the extremist left onto his show and presents them as mainstream democrats.

xor

(1,204 posts)
15. I think we (those who are liberally minded) need to call out students/group who behave like this
Wed May 31, 2017, 01:49 PM
May 2017

A) They might be more willing to listen to people who at least share some of their beliefs
B) Prevents the right from framing it in a way that benefits them.
C) Diffuse some of the divisions and maybe actually bring about some changes instead of adding fuel to the fire.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
50. That's what's so sick! Weinstein is a liberal.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 02:31 AM
Aug 2017

Despite the other excruciatingly dishonest thread on this event.

womanofthehills

(8,648 posts)
21. Republicans who think Fox is too liberal, will only watch Tucker and the weather
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:54 PM
Jun 2017

according to the Republicans on my Facebook page.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
53. Foxes MO too. Show the crazy ones. For debates, get weak debaters fot the Dems. The NRA is singing
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 06:33 AM
Aug 2017

the same song. Be afraid of violent leftists, give to the NRA, and buy guns, since they can't scare people w Obama & Hillary now. Ironically, many of us leftists don't even have guns.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
49. Easy. By default. MSNBC and the rest of MSM *runs* from stories like this.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 02:30 AM
Aug 2017

They're too busy harvesting ratings by sticking with the dumpster fire. Mustn't step up and call out our own!
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. Interesting reading. I was not familiar with this.
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:15 AM
May 2017

Some of the demands that are being met are pretty big decisions for a university to be making so quick. Outside of the firings, which I don't know enough to comment on, the list of demands looks solid. Some aren't going to happen but that is a great negotiation tactic.

I'm not sure what to make of the Professors Twitter.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
9. Thanks for sharing your insights
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:55 AM
May 2017

I do think most of the demands seem reasonable - except firing people.

kcr

(15,313 posts)
35. I know what to make of his twitter
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:40 AM
Jun 2017

I don't know much about the story, but he's an asshole. Anyone who uses the term SJW isn't the progressive they think they are.

ETA I see down thread that he's the one that went around whining to the right-wing media about this, making this their pet story. I see my assessment of him was correct. I hope he's fired.

Mike Nelson

(9,941 posts)
7. I have not been following...
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:18 AM
May 2017

...the story. Good to have a thread here instead of turning on FOX "News" for some insight.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
8. Thanks
Sun May 28, 2017, 08:24 AM
May 2017

It's annoying that Fox News and other RW sites are hyping this to the heavens, because that makes it difficult to look at the situation in a reasonable way. That's why I tried to focus on what the student newspaper itself is saying, along with one of the professors who is in the middle of things.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
10. I'd not heard of this story.
Sun May 28, 2017, 10:14 AM
May 2017

Pretty interesting.

Seems free speech on campus isn't valued so much anymore.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
12. It would nice if the identity of the woman
Wed May 31, 2017, 10:40 AM
May 2017

shouting f___ y___ over and over to the college professor was made known so that everyone could express their appreciation of her thoughtful discourse - especially future employers.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
11. I think it is garbage and the administration should have brought the hammer down
Wed May 31, 2017, 10:38 AM
May 2017

From the student newpaper

http://www.cooperpointjournal.com/category/news/

"Following a series of unsuccessful conversations with different, divided portions of the Evergreen administration over the past several weeks and years, they gathered, personally escorted and held President George Bridges, all of the Deans, the Vice President of Student Affairs Wendy Endress, a Board of Trustees representative, and the full teacher union bargaining team all in President George Bridges office for about five hours. The administration stayed in the room until demands to address the problems of systemic racism and oppression faced by minority students were agreed upon."

This is ridiculous, and I personally think the administration members should have tried to leave. The behavior is not mitigated by the later statement:

"No force was used to detain members involved in the meeting, and everyone held in the President’s office were provided with food and water, with students available to attend to any emerging needs, including medical care. The building entrances were barricaded when it seemed as if police would be on the way soon."

The author has admitted to something very close to unlawful imprisonment. If I had been one of the individuals held, I would file a complaint. The act of barricading seems to lead to that conclusion.

9A.40.040
Unlawful imprisonment.

(1) A person is guilty of unlawful imprisonment if he or she knowingly restrains another person.
(2) Unlawful imprisonment is a class C felony.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
16. There's been a lot of false reporting on this story
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 02:35 PM
Jun 2017

The chief talking point that is utterly false is that the "Day of Absence" Weinstein objected to involved whites not being welcome on campus. There was an off-campus event that day for up to 200 white-identified participants (on a campus of over 4000 students). There was some initial confusion among some faculty, staff and students regarding this point, but it was largely resolved well in advance of the event for anyone who looked into it. I do fault him for not correcting himself and his interviewers on this point; at the same time, his grievances go beyond that one event, too, so it's possible he considers it an unimportant detail.

Because he chose to cooperate with FOX and the right wing media, Weinstein's personal situation has been the focus of the national discussion, but it's only one small piece of what has happened there. A good summary was in The Olympian.

And all too predictably, this was the result of the story circulating in RW circles (resulting in a 2-day shutdown of the college)

http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/threat-closes-evergreen-state-college-amid-high-race-tensions/528732951

“Yes, I am on my way to Evergreen [College] now with a .44 Magnum. I am going to execute as many people on that campus as I can get a hold of,” the man said. “You have that, what’s going on here, you communist scumbag?”


 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
17. That's why I provided links to primary source materials
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 02:49 PM
Jun 2017

Articles written by students at the school, as well as tweets from the professor (plus one WaPo article).

I think they paint a pretty objective picture of what happened.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
18. Great to see another thread on this.
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 03:45 PM
Jun 2017

To add to the discussion on the RW media "hyping" this up; this brazen act of protesting (more like a witch hunt) should've been shut down as soon as the students went and threatened Weinstein. There was a complete lack of respect there, especially towards someone who is progressive themselves.

Of course FOX and other right-leaning sites would use this event to paint the left in a broad brush as psychos; no sites on the left (Salon, Vox, MIC, etc) are reporting on this event. The liberal sites seem to be complicit about the actions of these students and complicit in letting the RW media having a field day with the protests.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
20. Pretty similar to what I thought of Mizzou a couple years back.
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:47 PM
Jun 2017

I'm just horrified that these supposedly progressive students are acting this way. I don't know if it's the result of intersectional politics or how US schools are run these days, but I'm just shaking my head at the lack of respect these students had for the professor and the administration of their campus.

Dr. Strange

(25,915 posts)
22. It's not just the students.
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 10:01 PM
Jun 2017

Some faculty want Weinstein investigated.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zwPLnekTcjlmwO_0IyS7qF33sa40ufi2zAMEP-MU3IE/edit

Demonstrate accountability by pursuing a disciplinary investigation against Bret Weinstein according to guidelines in the Social Contract and Faculty Handbook. Weinstein has endangered faculty, staff, and students, making them targets of white supremacist backlash by promulgating misinformation in public emails, on national television, in news outlets, and on social media.
 

Lord_at_War

(61 posts)
34. I think this is where I land.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:29 AM
Jun 2017

Protests are fine, asking for changes is fine- but the students went way over the line.

The Prof in question seems to be somewhere between liberal and progressive, and didn't deserve what happened-. Looking at the overall history of Evergreen, the admin might be a bit more to the right of liberals and progressives- but they seem to be capitulating to the demands of the students- and illegal confinement of at least 10 people is always a crime.

I wonder what would have happened to any admin staff who tried to leave during the 5 hours they were held prisoner?

More red meat for the right...

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
25. Bridges is over a barrel
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 10:51 PM
Jun 2017

If he fires Weinstein, then it will appear to the RW like he caved to the students. If he doesn't do something about Weinstein, then students are going to become even more violent.

I'd send Weinstein on sabbatical and get together with the Equity and Multicultural people ASAP. Here is the thing; the Day of Absence was completely optional. Weinstein could have just said he wasn't going to participate. Or he could have said that he would hold class off campus (which he is doing already, now). Pretty easy solutions. He chose to fabricate a protest out of it. I'm not siding with the students on this, either. They have behaved just as badly. In the end, sending Weinstein away would, I think, allow everyone to cool down.

Armed police on campus is the other issue. Campus shootings is a huge deal at all colleges and universities. In fact, I would say that this is an even stickier situation than the Weinstein issue. Again, it is going to take dialogue between the president, faculty, and student groups to come to some deal. I can completely understand why Bridges would not disarm campus police. I would not either. However, proper vetting practices and cultural sensitivity training could go a long way in allaying student concerns. But none of these discussions can take place until Weinstein is out of the picture.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
32. How about the send the asshole students away
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 11:42 PM
Jun 2017

This shit is getting out of hand and needs to be dealt with. Do people go to college to attend class anymore or just to find shit to be offended by?

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
36. After reading his responses I don't see where he did anything wrong
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:46 AM
Jun 2017

There was a campus event. He expressed his opinion about the event and what he saw as a troubling way of doing the protest by encouraging certain classes of students to not appear on campus that day. Even if he misunderstood the intent of the event nothing in his statement appears to be racist in any way.

And the protests don't seem to even have started until weeks after the event and his statements.

If you send him away you have set the precedent that a professor can be removed just because a mob demands it. Talk about something that will have a deep a chilling effect on the freedom to have an honest and free discussion of ideas in what is supposed to be an institution of higher learning...

QC

(26,371 posts)
26. I think the students have legitimate concerns, given how bold
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 11:05 PM
Jun 2017

haters have become now that one of their own is in the White House, but...

they are attacking someone who is generally an ally because he disagrees with them on strategy. That's not a good way to build coalitions, and it's giving their enemies some pretty powerful ammunition.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
27. Weinstein sounds like an asshole.
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 11:08 PM
Jun 2017

His personal agenda is more important than a wider, more collective agenda.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
47. "Sounds" like an asshole?!?!
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 02:20 AM
Aug 2017

Do some homework.......it was the students who were behaving like total assholes. Weinstein's "personal agenda" was refusing to buckle to false charges of racism by a brain-dead shrieking mob.

MichMan

(11,859 posts)
28. They need to make examples of a few by expelling them
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 11:26 PM
Jun 2017

Last edited Mon Jun 5, 2017, 05:55 PM - Edit history (1)

Of course students are allowed to air grievances, but some of them went way too far and need to understand there are consequences to behavior.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
48. The right is correctly pointing out that we're eating ourselves.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 02:21 AM
Aug 2017

And they're 100% correct. I'm feeling very pessimistic about the '18 elections.

petronius

(26,594 posts)
29. Looks like the campus is closed again Monday, due to threats, after similar threats
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 01:42 AM
Jun 2017

Thursday and Friday. (And if I was gonna bet, I'd put my money on these threats coming from RW trolls trying to add to the havoc; whoever it is, I hope they're caught.)

http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article154363749.html

More broadly, it's difficult to get a real sense of what's going on: it seems that some of the issues go back throughout the school year, and ~90% of the news reports come from RW sources. It does look pretty clear to me that some students and faculty have acted rather poorly in the last few days, and it likewise seems that Prof. Weinstein misunderstood or misrepresented the 'Day of Absence' request. But so many of the other topics (the students rousted by police, whether the police officer(s) was/were overly forceful during protests, the hiring diversity question) are murky to those of us outside.

Although it would take far murkier murk to prevent the internet from having a passionately-held and bloodily-argued opinion. Wharrgarbl! To the ramparts!

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
30. I used to live not too far from there
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 02:37 AM
Jun 2017

and a lot of the people in the timber community I resided in thought of the Evergreen State College as a sort of playpen for people who refused to grow up.

My former wife and I (she went to Evergreen) were down in California at a winery in the Napa Valley in 1999, and our tour host (a lovely British lady) said her son was in WA at a "hippie college". Yes, she was talking about Evergreen.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
37. My first thought was "where are the trustees?"
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:11 AM
Jun 2017

Typically trustees of a small college like this one would be local business people. I would have expected them to have already stepped in and fired the President and brought security in.

Seeing the students screaming at cornered professors did look more like the Chinese Cultural Revolution than anything else I could think of.

Also, I hire people from time to time, and these students don't know how much harm they are doing their future by behaving this way on film.

I would expect registration at this school to be way down next year which may even challenge the school's survival.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
40. Sounds like bullshit reasons were discovered to be offended, and goofy demands are now being made.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:26 AM
Jun 2017

Taken over facilities? Keeping people barricaded?
Disarm the campus police of lethal and no-lethal equipment?

meh.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
41. I read through the list of demands and my first reaction was
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:38 AM
Jun 2017

now I know why my professor and instructor friends complain about how big the administration is on campuses.

It seems like the answer to each demand was we'll add another full time admistrator to be in charge of that.



romanic

(2,841 posts)
42. And now these protestors are carrying bats around campus.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:30 AM
Jun 2017

I saw it on Twitter. These people are clearly mentally ill. :/

alp227

(31,996 posts)
44. Did any of these "students" take communication classes?
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:31 PM
Jun 2017

Being self righteous is one thing. Being able to convince others to listen to you is another.

The Evergreen State situation shows how the left has an image problem - it's too easy for the message to be overshadowed by tone/expression. Conservatives, on the other hand, know how to combine passion and persuasion more effectively to the "fence sitters". Just listen to your local "news/talk" radio station. You'll know what I mean.

Think about it - if you're undecided/on the fence about an issue, would you be persuaded by any of those self styled student activists, as opposed to the "alt right" types who are so full of shit yet managing to be more civil/calm about it?

Response to alp227 (Reply #44)

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
52. The students are/were punks.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 02:52 AM
Aug 2017

They disrupted the swearing-in of the new (female) campus police chief with nasty pejoratives. The following video covers hearing testimony relating to the conflict. What I described in sentence 1 appears at 1:16:05 in the video. Elsewhere, the spineless college president tap dances around, and passes the buck.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone have thoughts on t...