General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums538: Who Is In The Top 5 of Anti-Trump Senators? Yes, Corey Booker.
538 keeps a running tally of how often every member of the House and the Senate votes with or against the president. Looking on this board, you are starting to see a series of threads claiming that Corey Booker is a Trump ally who is supportive of his agenda. Yet, Booker's record is clear. He is among the five most anti-Trump Senators in the Senate based on 538's Trump Score. Of course, Booker has also consistently voted against most of Trump's nominees. Most actual liberals and progressives who actually review a Democrats record would see this.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/
However, we need to be aware of posts that simply repeat or recite talking point attacks. The trolls are not going to wait until the eve of the 2018 or 2020 elections to attack. If you see posters who spend most of their posts attacking Democrats from the "left," while giving Trump and his Republican co-conspirators a free pass, then you need to be vigilant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/russian-propaganda-effort-helped-spread-fake-news-during-election-experts-say/2016/11/24/793903b6-8a40-4ca9-b712-716af66098fe_story.html?utm_term=.b9b0c045f574
The flood of fake news this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.
Russias increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human trolls, and networks of websites and social-media accounts echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers. The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of international tensions and promote fear of looming hostilities with nuclear-armed Russia.
Two teams of independent researchers found that the Russians exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment, as an insurgent candidate harnessed a wide range of grievances to claim the White House. The sophistication of the Russian tactics may complicate efforts by Facebook and Google to crack down on fake news, as they have vowed to do after widespread complaints about the problem.
There is no way to know whether the Russian campaign proved decisive in electing Trump, but researchers portray it as part of a broadly effective strategy of sowing distrust in U.S. democracy and its leaders. The tactics included penetrating the computers of election officials in several states and releasing troves of hacked emails that embarrassed Clinton in the final months of her campaign.
Cha
(296,872 posts)Cha
(296,872 posts)The cha-cha?
TomCADem
(17,382 posts)Cha
(296,872 posts)I did the cha-cha in a long time, SC!
murielm99
(30,717 posts)This cannot be repeated enough. It is happening here, and everywhere.
High fives for you and Corey Booker.
roomtomove
(217 posts)roomtomove
(217 posts)Booker was bought......
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Booker's position is the same as ... Bernie Sanders.
HarmonyRockets
(397 posts)We got a Russian over here people!!!!!!!!
Just kidding. No, it's not fake news. Booker did in fact do it.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He's a "wait and learn all the facts" man. He's also that way about calling for impeachment.
Kushner & the W.H. haven't made statements yet about the reports about Kushner.
Different people have different views of things. If it were you, I imagine you'd think it fairer to at least wait until you have your day in court.
OTOH, when we're talking about security, there is some reasoning behind erring on the side of caution.
Booker said, ""I think we need to first get to the bottom of it, he needs to answer for what was happening at the time," Booker said. "It raises very serious concerns for me and that could be a potential outcome that I seek." (speaking of pulling the security clearance.)
I don't know much about Booker, but come on...he didn't "defend" Kushner in any way. Obama would have said something similar as a response, IMO.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Booker did NOT refuse to support the calls for pulling the clearance. He says FIRST we need to "get to the bottom of it" and it "could be a potential outcome that I seek."
He's calling for due process. Yes, I know, what a strange concept.
"Booker refused to support those calls during an interview with CNN Sunday. Asked if supports revoking Kushner's security clearance, the New Jersey senator said: 'I think we need to first get to the bottom of it. He needs to answer for what was happening at the time. It raises very serious concerns for me. And that could be a potential outcome that I seek, but I want to understand, at least hear from Jared Kushner, as well as the administration, about what was exactly going on there.'"
And when Kushner and the OTHER PEOPLE donated the $41K to Booker, Kushner was still a Democrat. He's clearly left the party now and Booker owes nothing to him.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Not so much fake news as it is simply a premise predicated wholly on a logical fallacy. After this, therefor because of this...
I admire your imaginative pluck, your alleged concern and your creative narrative, but I believe it to be more imagination, allegation and creativity than actual pluck, concern and narrative.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Booker didn't defend Kushner, and Kushner was a wealthy Democrat in Booker's state prior to Trump's run. It's connecting two unrelated things, while blatantly being dishonest about Booker's words anyway.
BigmanPigman
(51,568 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)Hey look who has an even better score!
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/bernard-sanders/
TomCADem
(17,382 posts)Unlike the Republican Party, women are the leaders of the progressive movement and the party.
Wounded Bear
(58,604 posts)They perfected it with Hillary.
1. Spot up-and-comers in the Dem party.
2. Start the attacks early, with generally insignificant facts and factoids, and innuendo and outright lies.
3. Lather, rinse, repeat to weaken them on the way up, so if they do make the national stage, their minions already hate them.
They're expanding these attacks to most of the Dems that might be threats to them in coming election cycles.
TomCADem
(17,382 posts)I was at an anti-Trump rally in Los Angeles, which was awesome. However, I still saw some folks in the crowd pushing the Communist party and passing out flyers promoting the secession of California, which Russia heavily promotes along with Texit. The Russians are not for the left or the right. They are opportunists.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/how-putin-played-the-far-left
Moscows attempts to cultivate Americas far-left long predate the presidency of Vladimir Putin. The Kremlin, according to available evidence, donated more funds per capita to the U.S. Communist Party than any other communist claque during the Soviet period, when Moscows intelligence operations against the main adversary involved recruiting agents of influence and spies of a progressive background who were sympathetic to the Soviet cause. But the past 18 months have seen a noted spike in information warfare aimed at gulling the Bernie Bros and Occupy-besotted alternative-media set, which saw Clinton as more of a political danger than it did Trump.
Perhaps the starkest case in point is Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein and her constituency. In December 2015, the Kremlin feted Stein by inviting her to the gala celebrating the 10-year anniversary of Kremlin-funded propaganda network RT. Over a year later, it remains unclear who paid for Steins trip to Moscow and her accommodations there. Her campaign ignored multiple questions on this score. We do know, however, that Stein sat at the same table as both Putin and Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, Trumps soon-to-be national security adviser. She further spoke at an RT-sponsored panel, using her presence to criticize the U.S.s disastrous militarism. Afterward, straddling Moscows Red Square, Stein described the panel as inspiring, going on to claim that Putin, whom she painted as a political novice, told her he agree[d] with her on many issues.
Stein presents herself as a champion of the underclass and the environment, and an opponent of the surveillance state and corporate media, and yet she seemed to take pleasure in her marriage of true minds with a kleptocratic intelligence officer who levels forests and arrests or kills critical journalists and invades foreign countries. Their true commonality, of course, is that both Putin and Stein are dogged opponents of U.S. foreign policy.
Indeed, her pro-Kremlin stance wasnt limited to merely praising Putins amicability. Stein joined the Russian president and Kazakhstani dictator Nursultan Nazarbayev in describing Ukraines 2014 EuroMaidan revolution as a coup, and claimed, bizarrely, that NATO is currently fighting enemies we invent to give the weapons industry a reason to sell more stuff. For good measure, she also asserted in September that Russia used to own Ukraine, by way of defending its colonization. She even selected a vice-presidential candidate who, when asked whether the downing of Flight MH17a massacre almost certainly caused by Russian-supplied separatists in eastern Ukrainewas a false flag, responded, [T]hats exactly what has happened.