Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Department didn't read U.S. attorney resignation letters they refused to release
Justice Department didn't read U.S. attorney resignation letters they refused to release
Adam Silverman, Burlington (Vt.) Free Press 7:54 p.m. ET May 31, 2017
BURLINGTON, Vt. The Justice Department decided to keep secret on privacy grounds the resignation letters from nearly 50 U.S. attorneys ousted by the Trump administration without first reading any of the letters, public records show.
Justice Department lawyers in March denied a Burlington Free Press request under the federal Freedom of Information Act for copies of the letters, on grounds that the information in the documents was so "inherently personal" that they should be exempt from release.
....
Open-government advocates took issue with the Justice Department's initial refusal and even more so with the agency's refusal to read the documents in question.
"Wow," said Alex Howard, deputy director of the Sunlight Foundation. ... "This is about whether some of the most powerful people in our justice system are continuing to serve or not, and communicating their rationale for that," said Howard, whose Washington-based non-partisan organization presses for government transparency. ... "These are not spies coming in from the cold. These are not people who have been subject to targeted harassment or are being prosecuted for illegal actions," he added. "They're U.S. attorneys resigning from office, and the circumstances of that should be known to the public."
Adam Silverman, Burlington (Vt.) Free Press 7:54 p.m. ET May 31, 2017
BURLINGTON, Vt. The Justice Department decided to keep secret on privacy grounds the resignation letters from nearly 50 U.S. attorneys ousted by the Trump administration without first reading any of the letters, public records show.
Justice Department lawyers in March denied a Burlington Free Press request under the federal Freedom of Information Act for copies of the letters, on grounds that the information in the documents was so "inherently personal" that they should be exempt from release.
....
Open-government advocates took issue with the Justice Department's initial refusal and even more so with the agency's refusal to read the documents in question.
"Wow," said Alex Howard, deputy director of the Sunlight Foundation. ... "This is about whether some of the most powerful people in our justice system are continuing to serve or not, and communicating their rationale for that," said Howard, whose Washington-based non-partisan organization presses for government transparency. ... "These are not spies coming in from the cold. These are not people who have been subject to targeted harassment or are being prosecuted for illegal actions," he added. "They're U.S. attorneys resigning from office, and the circumstances of that should be known to the public."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 4240 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Department didn't read U.S. attorney resignation letters they refused to release (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2017
OP
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)1. Then knowing this, said attorneys can and ought to tell the public, each on his or her own!
global1
(25,263 posts)2. I Sure They Have Copies....
They should release them on their own.
underpants
(182,861 posts)3. Sessions was busy with meetings