HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Is it past time to stop t...

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:29 PM

Is it past time to stop trusting media sources funded via RT??

I was listening to the Friday replay of the Thom Hartman show this morning and I was somewhat shocked to hear the fill in host rant about the Russian ties to Trump and his people. Essentially, and I admittedly caught the rant after it had started, he was lambasting the number of articles online and in mainstream media that are trying to connect the Trump campaign and the current administration to Russia, suggesting that much of it was fake in order to generate outrage from the left. While I agree that some sources should be taken with a grain of salt, I think there's been pretty clear evidence of collusion. I let that pass, thinking perhaps I missed the start of the rant and therefore missed his point. Yet, minutes later, when discussing potential impeachment of Trump, there was ZERO mention of Russian collusion, in fact it seemed like he went out of his way to avoid mentioning that as a cause for impeachment!

I think we can all agree that several of the RT "liberal" commentators have been more keen to attack Democrats than pursuing the Russian allegations. Should we now begin to question the motivation of those media personalities on the RT payroll?

69 replies, 4505 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 69 replies Author Time Post
Reply Is it past time to stop trusting media sources funded via RT?? (Original post)
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 OP
jehop61 Jun 2017 #1
jrthin Jun 2017 #2
Barack_America Jun 2017 #3
marylandblue Jun 2017 #4
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #5
sharedvalues Jun 2017 #57
bettyellen Jun 2017 #6
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #7
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #10
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #11
bettyellen Jun 2017 #17
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #19
bettyellen Jun 2017 #21
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #23
bettyellen Jun 2017 #26
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #27
Adrahil Jun 2017 #32
bettyellen Jun 2017 #35
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #36
Adrahil Jun 2017 #30
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #34
bettyellen Jun 2017 #37
Adrahil Jun 2017 #42
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #44
Adrahil Jun 2017 #46
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #47
Adrahil Jun 2017 #48
emulatorloo Jun 2017 #45
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #50
emulatorloo Jun 2017 #51
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #53
emulatorloo Jun 2017 #61
sharedvalues Jun 2017 #56
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #8
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #12
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #15
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #16
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #18
bettyellen Jun 2017 #20
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #22
sharedvalues Jun 2017 #63
Trial_By_Fire Jun 2017 #64
sharedvalues Jun 2017 #66
emulatorloo Jun 2017 #49
bettyellen Jun 2017 #60
hrmjustin Jun 2017 #9
bettyellen Jun 2017 #25
Squinch Jun 2017 #13
Spider Jerusalem Jun 2017 #14
wildeyed Jun 2017 #24
Else You Are Mad Jun 2017 #28
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #29
Else You Are Mad Jun 2017 #31
bettyellen Jun 2017 #39
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #55
bettyellen Jun 2017 #41
sharedvalues Jun 2017 #58
Bucky Jun 2017 #33
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #38
bettyellen Jun 2017 #40
Bucky Jun 2017 #43
bettyellen Jun 2017 #52
sharedvalues Jun 2017 #54
OilemFirchen Jun 2017 #59
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #62
bettyellen Jun 2017 #65
SHRED Jun 2017 #67
Docreed2003 Jun 2017 #68
Cha Jun 2017 #69

Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:31 PM

1. Stopped listening

To Thom when I heard he was align d with RT. Don't trust it as an unbiased source

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:32 PM

2. It's way past time. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:32 PM

3. Yes. Nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:38 PM

4. haven't been listening to RT for a long time

I used to like some of those hosts, but now they are sellouts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marylandblue (Reply #4)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:40 PM

5. It certainly seems that way

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marylandblue (Reply #4)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:37 PM

57. Russia Today RT? Propanganda organ of Putin?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:42 PM

6. I reached this conclusion a year ago, they and the Intercept lost me. Had a friend who repeated

 

A lot of that crap and at some point I told him he was reading garbage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #6)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:48 PM

7. I think I foolishly believed Thom was different...

While this was a fill in host, Thom has not been much better on the issue...money beats principle I suppose

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #7)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:53 PM

10. Thom Hartmann is an asset to the Democratic party and cause...

 

Anybody who know anything about Thom Hartmann knows he is cool dude and a unbelievable patriot to America and Democratic issues and policies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #10)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:57 PM

11. While I used to believe that...

I have serious reservations when he tends to avoid discussing the Russian allegations and has a host that essentially calls out any allegations as being "fake news".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #10)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:20 PM

17. I think it's easy to get sucked in and lose credibility by association- and that's RTs aim by

 

Surrounding him with nutters and Russian propaganda.
He may himself be a good guy, but it seems his sub host is a shill, and the association hurts his reputation.
Just as Cenk lost credibility by associating with cretins.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #17)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:28 PM

19. Totally wrong...

 

Sax is a good guy from what I know, I did not hear anything from Sax that makes me
think he is a 'shill' except for the Dem causes...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #19)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:32 PM

21. You say you never watch RT, just Hartman... so you're lecturing me about RT why?

 

This is hilarious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #21)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:34 PM

23. See my post on your comment.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #23)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:37 PM

26. You watched a few minutes.... got it.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #26)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:39 PM

27. How about you?

 

How much time have YOU watched Hartmann on RT?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #27)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:55 PM

32. It doesn't matter....

 

Even if Hartmann is doing straight journalism, he is serving Putin's interests in disguising RT as a legitimate news source.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #27)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:01 PM

35. I've skimmed stories on RT almost a year back and could see how slanted they are- sorry they're

 

Going to jack up Hatman's reputation but that is how things will likely work. I guess if he keeps his nose clean he can keep a lot of his fans, but I'm not supporting RT's network of reporters. Plenty of other sources that don't try to muddy the waters with DTs deep state bullshit. If Hartman was smart he'd get far away from them while he can.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #35)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:07 PM

36. So, you have never watch Hartmann on RT, yet...

 

you want to bad mouth him? W T F?

As I posted in this thread - 1) Solid real Democratic issues are discussed, and 2) where
are all the rich Dems supporting *ANY* fucking left-Dem radio and TV?

Right, there aren't any...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #10)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:53 PM

30. He's taking Putin's paycheck.

 

You can justify it however you like. He is serving Putin's interests. Even if he is doing honest journalism, he is just there to create the illusion that RT is a legitimate news source and now the propaganda network that it actually is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Adrahil (Reply #30)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:00 PM

34. Bullshit.

 

Have the DU geniuses figured out that:

1) Hartmann is the Democratic patriot speaking on Dem values on RT? and
2) that, since nobody funds *true* Democratic talk and radio shows, he went on RT.

And, his radio show is broadcast thru-out the world?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #34)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:08 PM

37. So only Putin will give him a paycheck and that is good? WOW that's fucked up.

 

You don't think there's better people to work for? You've gone full fake news here. I gotta guess you trust Putin more than the American IC too? That would follow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #34)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:17 PM

42. Is he taking Russian money or not?

 

Ask yourself why Vladimir Putin would employ him.

Hint: it's not because he wants to advance journalistic integrity or Democratic values.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Adrahil (Reply #42)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:19 PM

44. I question anybody who questions Thom Hartmann...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #44)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:21 PM

46. Then you are doing it wrong.

 

I've listening to Thom, and have liked him. But if he has managed to convince himself that he isn't being used, then he is a fool.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Adrahil (Reply #46)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:21 PM

47. Who's the fool?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #47)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:22 PM

48. Hartmann. Thought that was clear. NT

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #34)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:20 PM

45. Hartmann could distribute on YouTube if he wished

Similar to TYT.

He's got choices. Doesn't need to be associated w Putin's propaganda mashine.

I've suggested several decent options over the last several yrs to the intern who posts on DU under his name. Crickets...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to emulatorloo (Reply #45)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:28 PM

50. Thom use to talk up DemocraticUnderground until....

 

...after the election day hack (and subsequent hack(s)) and people here started to bad mouth
him.

I question *anybody* who questions Hartmann...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #50)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:30 PM

51. Hartmann fan here so give it a rest

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to emulatorloo (Reply #51)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:32 PM

53. Beg your pardon?

 

I was not the person who started this thread...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #53)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:40 PM

61. "I question *anybody* who questions Hartmann"

You wrote that in yr response to me.

So it Seemed like you were addressing me as someone on your untrustworthy 'enemies list'

If I misinterpreted then I misinterpreted

I don't question Thom's progressive bonafides.

I just don't know why he's still on RT. I believe it hurts his rep, I'd love for him to get off Putin Today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #34)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:35 PM

56. RT is Russian propaganda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:51 PM

8. Who was the 'fill in host'? Was it on the radio show or the TV show?

 

I question your interpretation that resulted in "he was lambasting the number of articles online and in mainstream media that are trying to connect the Trump campaign and the current administration to Russia, suggesting that much of it was fake in order to generate outrage from the left.".

Hartmann, for sure, wants a compete investigation into the Russian-Trump issue. And, on the radio, I never heard a fill in host talk like you suggested.

It seems that all DUers do is to rag on people, even good/great Dems.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #8)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:03 PM

12. If you're as big of a fan as you purport to be...

I would imagine you would know the answer your own question!

Friday, the radio fill in host was Sam Sacks.

As I said in the Op, I'm happy to be corrected in my interpretation and I admit that I caught the rant mid-way through.

I'm not trying to tear anyone down. I'm voicing sincere concerns, which I think are warranted considering the financing of the show.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #12)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:09 PM

15. Of course I knew who the fill in host was...

 

I was wondering if YOU knew who the host was.

Obviously, you have not listen to Hartmann for the last 13 years as I have. He is
as true blue as they come.

I imagine his only 'crime' in some people's mind is that he was a Sanders supporter until
the primaries were over and then was all in for clinton.

DUer's really need to stick with real issues and get off of the 'people smearing'.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #15)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:16 PM

16. Way to make a bunch of assumptions

If supporting Sanders is a crime, then I'm guilty as well! I would have you refer to my posts from the primaries for evidence because I was as big of a supporter of Sanders as anyone on here.

I realize Thom has been reliably blue, and I can assure you I've listened to most every program for the better part of 9 years, as long as I've had Sirius/XM.

My concern was the rant and the accusation, as well as the funding of the show for RT. I think that's a fair concern, do you not? And I think that's a real issue, considering Thom's program is a source of information for many liberals

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #16)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:25 PM

18. No, I am not worried about Hartmann on RT...Why, because....

 

...Hartmann has full and total control on his radio show. To be honest, I do not watch Hartmann on RT
except to say that the few times I channel surfed to RT, he was basically doing his radio show on the TV.

As an educated total FDR Democrat, Hartmann does nothing but GOOD for the Democratic causes and policies.

It's his track record - Hartmann is a true blue, very intelligent, gifted talker for all Democratic causes and policies.

If you have listen to Hartmann for 9 years, you should know his loyalties.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #18)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:31 PM

20. Ahh the RT expert doesn't even watch it, lectures others on credibility! Interesting, LOL....

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #20)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:34 PM

22. I listen to his radio show... And

 

...a few times I did catch a minute or two on RT he was doing his radio show on the TV.

Have you actually listen to Hartmann on his radio show or his TV show? Tell me
when and what did he say that suggests that Hartmann is shilling for the goddamn Russians?

Or have you never watched RT too? And if you have, why are you watching RT?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #22)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:48 PM

63. Dude. RT hired Hartmann on purpose

To bring in liberals. Because then the liberals are likely to listen to stuff before and after, and RT can influence ads during the show.

The problem is the bosses at RT. Hartmann can't fix them. He was hired for show and will be kept only as long as he is useful for propaganda purposes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sharedvalues (Reply #63)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:54 PM

64. As usual, Hartmann is always one step ahead....

 

His tv show is Progressive Liberal and Democratic... He works his
ass off delivering the Progressive Liberal Democratic message even
on RT. It is his way, I believe, to counteract any Russian propaganda.

Get it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #64)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 10:21 PM

66. RT hired him to court liberals

Standard propaganda trick. Embrace. Extend. Extinguish.

Hartmann's motives can be as white as the fresh driven snow, and they probably are. But RT uses him as a tool to court liberals that they then try to persuade with their other shows and by shading coverage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trial_By_Fire (Reply #15)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:26 PM

49. Petty 'gotcha' games with your fellow DU'ers?

Nice!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to emulatorloo (Reply #49)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:39 PM

60. The best stuff here is claiming RT is as legit as BBC, that's pure Putin right there....

 

And TYT is akin to MSNBC. Waaaaah!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 07:51 PM

9. I never trusted them from the moment RT came on the air.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #9)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:35 PM

25. Suddenly their bogus crap was all over FB last year... that was the time for people who cared about

 

Their reputations to bail out. They're at best lenading the operation some credibility. Have people here comparing them to BBC now, LOL. And TYT w MSNBC! I wish I was making this up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:07 PM

13. Uhhhh.... ya think?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:08 PM

14. Way way past time, anyone appearing on RT is on the Kremlin payroll

you may as well be getting your news from Tass or Pravda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:34 PM

24. RT is the propaganda arm of the Kremlin.

Anyone paid by RT is paid by the Kremlin. If you listen to anyone paid by RT, you are being manipulated by Russian propaganda. This is not a hard connection to make. Patriotic Americans just say no to Russian propaganda.

Good propaganda gently leads you down the trail by appealing to some of your innate bias and then nudging you in the direction they want you to go until you think that YOU thought of it yourself. It's insidious. I constructed a private Twitter list of RT and other Russian propaganda sources specifically to track what they are doing and sometime I find myself nodding along to an article that rings my bells in just the right way. They are very good at what they do. Beware.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:41 PM

28. Uhh, Thom Hartmann..

Steadfastly refuses to allow any discussion that insults Democrats. Please don't spread lies.

I really am wondering why certain and proven liberals have all of a sudden are being attacked? If you want to disregard Thom, then you are ignoring one of the only liberal radio hosts that is syndicated on terrestrial radio. Most talk show hosts on terrestrial radio are RWNJ hosts like Limbaugh, Savage, Levin, ad nauseum. That is interesting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Else You Are Mad (Reply #28)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:49 PM

29. I'm neither insulting democrats or spreading lies...

It was on the radio show on Friday!

Voicing a concern about content on his show does not equate to an attack

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #29)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:54 PM

31. Why I am concerned...

Is that Friday he had a guest host on his show. Thom was not on the air at all this week. So, he could not have said anything and you cannot accuse Thom of anything if it was a guest host.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #29)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:10 PM

39. That guest host was Hartmans long time producer who worked for Sputnik as well as RT....

 

And we have a two people here comparing RT to BBC...
saying RT is better than American media groups.


Surreal, isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #39)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:34 PM

55. It definitely is surreal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #29)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:15 PM

41. Interesting you're be blamed for what RT does all day long.... and RT is compared to the BBC?

 

This is all Putin propaganda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Reply #29)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:38 PM

58. RT is propaganda from Putin

This is an information war and one of Putin's strategies is to divide the left by appealing to some of them on RT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:58 PM

33. What the hell? Quit trusting RT? You might as well say "let's quit looking...

...under the table during Fox 'news' shows for beaver shots"!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #33)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:09 PM

38. Lmao

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #33)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:14 PM

40. No Bucky- just no. Please clean up this trash, hostility to one woman is hostility to us all.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #40)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:19 PM

43. I'm sorry. My hostility is toward the exploitation, not toward the exploitees

I plea the Frank Zappa defense. It's just words.

But yes, I agree we should denounce hostility to women. I think sarcasm is a fair way to do so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #43)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:31 PM

52. Sorry Bucky- it's repulsive and it's not okay.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:33 PM

54. What??? RT is Russian propaganda. All of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:38 PM

59. Just so you know, this was alerted for peddling right-wing talking points.

That's pretty rich, huh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OilemFirchen (Reply #59)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 09:42 PM

62. Wow...that's amazing

Thanks for the heads up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OilemFirchen (Reply #59)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 10:05 PM

65. I KNEW that was coming w some of the slick framing here- "why you attack

 

"great Dem media" as presented by RT and TYT.

You can't make this shit up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 11:08 PM

67. I like Thom

 

I think he should disassociate from RT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SHRED (Reply #67)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 11:17 PM

68. Agreed...I wish he would as well. Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Docreed2003 (Original post)

Sun Jun 4, 2017, 11:18 PM

69. I never trusted them. Pawns for putin..



"When I came to the event for our company, Russia Today, and sat down at the table, next to me there was a gentleman sitting on one side," Putin continued. "I made my speech. Then we talked about some other stuff. And I got up and left. And then afterwards I was told, 'You know there was an American gentleman. He was involved in some things. He used to be in the security services' ... that's it. I didn't even really talk to him... That's the extent of my acquaintance with Mr. Flynn."

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/vladimir-putin-dinner-michael-flynn-i-didn-t-even-really-n768016?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=9157283

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread