Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,079 posts)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 01:45 PM Jun 2017

Will the Republicans blaming "Anti-Trump rhetoric" for 1 of today's shootings remember their words

Next time they're calling American Muslims a creeping cancer?

Next time they're saying transgender people are all deviants who just want to go in bathrooms for some nefarious purpose?

Next time they're calling people with pre-existing conditions "scammers" and we don't need to worry about them because they probably deserve what they're getting anyway?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will the Republicans blaming "Anti-Trump rhetoric" for 1 of today's shootings remember their words (Original Post) ck4829 Jun 2017 OP
Next time they call for marshal law... pbmus Jun 2017 #1
I'm confused SHRED Jun 2017 #2
Let's not forget... Zoonart Jun 2017 #3
One answer for all 3 questions Hayduke Bomgarte Jun 2017 #4
That is why we remind them. Freethinker65 Jun 2017 #5
Here's a question. Igel Jun 2017 #6

Igel

(35,337 posts)
6. Here's a question.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 03:14 PM
Jun 2017

Do we honestly believe that the anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim, anti-LGBT, anti-abortion rhetoric triggered any attacks on Jews, Muslims, or abortion clinics?

If yes, own that belief and act on it. If no, then there's nothing to complain about because such speech is meaningless--and apart from making the speakers and listeners feel good, without effect. (Although granted, feeling good is a strong effect, all those endorphins and whatnot).

I mean, really. Both sides deny that the rhetoric has any effect at all when they engage in it; both insist that the other side is uniquely horrible for encouraging and fomenting such attacks with such rhetoric when those kinds of attacks actually happen. It's one or neither. We're all human, and mental illness doesn't seem, in spite of attempts to define anything that's not-like-us as deranged, to pick and choose political parties. I personally have trouble defining Hodgkinson as mentally ill.

If they're wrong for saying things that can cause weak minds to go off and kill Muslims, GLBTers, etc., it's not something I can defend when I do it. I have no control over them; but I do have control over me, more at some times than at others. When I see somebody else indulging in something I consider immoral, I'd like to think I have enough principles to not say, "Hey, if he can be bad, why can't I violate my own conscience?" So I don't.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will the Republicans blam...