General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDK - Alan Grayson steps up asking for help for Dennis - and I join that request
from my email inbox tonightAs the war in Iraq finally draws to a close, here is a quick quiz. Who said the following, and when, and and where?
There is no proof that Iraq represents an immediate or imminent threat to the United States. . . . The Administration has refused to provide the Congress with credible intelligence that proves that Iraq is a serious threat to the United States, and is continuing to develop chemical and biological and nuclear weapons.
The Iraq regime has never attacked nor does it have the capability to attack the United States.
There is no credible intelligence that connects Iraq to the events of 9/11 or to participation in those events by assisting Al Qaida. . . . There is no connection between Iraq and the events of 9/11. . . . There is no credible evidence that Iraq harbored those who were responsible for planning, authorizing or committing the attacks of 9/11.
There is no credible evidence that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction.
Congress has not been provided with any credible information, which proves that Iraq has provided international terrorists with weapons of mass destruction.
Unilateral action against Iraq will cost the United States the support of the world community.
So, who said this? Me? No -- I wish it were me. It was Congressman Dennis Kucinich.
And when? On October 2, 2002, six months before the War in Iraq began.
And where? On the Floor of the House, and in a letter to his colleagues in Congress.
Was it clarity? No, it was more than clarity. It was almost clairvoyance.
At a time when almost every public figure in America was hoodwinked and bamboozled by Bush Administration propaganda, Dennis Kucinich was not. Dennis Kucinich saw the truth, and he said the truth. And Dennis followed through, doggedly opposing the war in Iraq from alpha to omega.
Congress is full of replaceable parts. But Dennis Kucinich is not one of them. Dennis is unique.
Now Dennis Kucinich is in the toughest race of his 15-year career in Congress. The Republicans have tried to gerrymander him out of Congress. He needs your help, and he needs it now.
The Koch Brothers are not going to help Dennis Kucinich. Karl Rove is not going to help Dennis Kucinich. Fox News is not going to help Dennis Kucinich.
Its up to us.
Before midnight on December 31, please make a contribution to Dennis Kucinichs campaign.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)It's Kucinich (D) vs. Kaptur (D) In Ohio Congressional Race - (and Joe The Plumber is going for that seat too!)
More details here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1100130
p.s. I do NOT like the idea of Kucinich trying to boot a FEMALE Democrat out of Congress - we need MORE females in Congress not less!
Edited to add: http://marcykaptur.com/
Mira
(22,481 posts)we need more like Dennis K. - gender is secondary.
MuseRider
(34,387 posts)I have always supported DK and Kaptur has some questionable voting recently on women's issues, at least as far as I am concerned. I sent both Grayson and DK money the other day.
It is sad this has happened.
NARAL gave Kaptur a 30% rating on pro-choice issues. I think this was for 2010 - I don't know when the 2011 ratings come out.
http://ontheissues.org/OH/Marcy_Kaptur_Abortion.htm
RC
(25,592 posts)(D) means very little any more.
phasma ex machina
(2,328 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)ixion
(29,528 posts)they're they right gender/party. Got it.
MattBaggins
(7,942 posts)Should Obama step down and let bachman win if she were to be the GOP nominee?
Kaptur has a 30% NARAL rating on womens rights voting record.
Kuchinich has a 100% NARAL rating.
Why should I support Kaptur?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)So are Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin.
Gender offers NO guarantees.
Neither does Race, Sex, Religion, or any other social designation.
The ONLY thing to consider when casting a vote is
Where does He/She STAND on The ISSUES,
and does their Track Record match their Campaign Rhetoric.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)after the redistricting the majority of what is in the new boundaries is what what in Kapturs original district!
I just think it's shitty that Kucinich is going to try to boot her out of HER seat.
He could have decided to run for a different seat other than Marcy's.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)instead of focusing on her gender as the reason to vote FOR her.
Kaptur is an interesting Democrat,
but does NOT have the consistent Liberal bonafides of Kucinich.
I don't live in Ohio, but I will be sending donations to Kucinich.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)mvd
(65,494 posts)How do Kaptur's policies compare with Dennis's? She seems liberal based on her site, but I hope close to Dennis's beliefs in case Dennis loses.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)mvd
(65,494 posts)I'll stick with Dennis, though.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)But I am going to vote for Marcy Kaptur.
I believe she is much more effective as a legislator and is quite good at constituent matters.
It's a tough call, but for Ohio, I would think Ms. Kaptur would be the better choice due to seniority as well as temperament.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Marcy Kaptur: http://house.ontheissues.org/OH/Marcy_Kaptur.htm
Dennis Kucinich: http://house.ontheissues.org/OH/Dennis_Kucinich.htm
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)got root
(425 posts)go DK
contributed!