General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBOOM! Trump allegedly asked Director of National Intelligence Coats
to intervene with Comey to get the FBI to "back off" the investigation into Flynn. That, ladies and gentlemen, is obstruction of justice, almost exactly what Nixon did by ordering the CIA to obstruct the FBI's Watergate investigation.
"Coats told associates that Trump had asked him whether Coats could intervene with Comey to get the bureau to back off its focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn in its Russia probe, according to officials. Coats later told lawmakers that he never felt pressured to intervene."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/special-counsel-is-investigating-trump-for-possible-obstruction-of-justice/2017/06/14/9ce02506-5131-11e7-b064-828ba60fbb98_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.9c1c9d4eb740
HOLY SHIT! Trump asked Coats to obstruct justice.
writes3000
(4,734 posts)F&cked!
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)next step is to fire Comey.
onit2day
(1,201 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,112 posts)and illegal. Not the neophyte some reps are claiming.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)using fairly neutral language.
Maraya1969
(22,478 posts)That alone is pressure and he knew it! And pressure is asking while everyone knows about all your contacts with the Russians who routinely poison anyone who doesn't do their bidding.
If that scumbag had said those things to me I would have been afraid, to say the least. And that is pressure.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)He didn't say that Trump didn't ask him.....just that he never "felt" pressured to intervene.....
He didn't want to go to jail.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,174 posts).....the facts surrounding those feelings most definitely aren't.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Maeve
(42,281 posts)tRump like to fire disloyal poeple
Sgent
(5,857 posts)if he was just asked. Now if he acted on the request...
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Coats was trying to thread the needle with his response.
He won't be able to get away with that with the special counsel.
mercuryblues
(14,530 posts)ever testified if Coats tried to get him to back off on Flynn?
Phoenix61
(17,003 posts)He said that Coats and Rogers never asked him to back off Flynn.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Congress, and Trump obstructed justice.
mercuryblues
(14,530 posts)I tried googling it, but could not come up with the answer. All the hits were about trump asking Coats, Rogers and Comey.
malaise
(268,949 posts)Lock up the Con
Freethinker65
(10,010 posts)Boys will be boys. It was just a joke. IOKIYAT
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)When he asked if he "could" intervene, he wasn't suggesting that he should intervene. No, he was literally just asking, in the abstract, if he "could". Because you know, he's a novice and doesn't really understand what everyone in the government actually does. Insert eye roll here.
mopinko
(70,086 posts)rusty fender
(3,428 posts)Asking for lil' Jeffie Beau.
What a rube!
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I'm just saying it may very well be his dog.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,175 posts)isn't really malicious or evil or crooked -- he's just STUPID!
What a glowing endorsement!
progressoid
(49,983 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)I can't wait for those smug a-holes to get their comeuppance as well.
progressoid
(49,983 posts)They both have that blank, lack of emotion, look. Kind of creeps me out.
NBachers
(17,107 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 16, 2017, 02:42 AM - Edit history (1)
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Like Nick Cage in Raising Arizona: "Son, you got a panty on your head"
Eyeball_Kid
(7,431 posts)Oh.. and let's not forget emoluments. The kiddies are caught up in both. They'll need to get newspaper routes after the feds are done with them.
klook
(12,154 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)writes3000
(4,734 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)writes3000
(4,734 posts)I'm trying to assess whether they followed through with Trump's request.
If so, they could be in legal jeopardy.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)spanone
(135,827 posts)i wonder what would ensue had a democrat done the same?
well, i really don't wonder.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)If in fact Comey's announcement of taking up the case again is what threw the election to tRump... seeing as Comey essentially stated that Bill's tarmac meeting with Lynch was the turning point for his decision to make that announcement.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)It sounds like he asked, but they did not comply... therefore no obstruction occurred (in this particular case). I think maybe the most important part of this is that it is further evidence of Trump's state of mind, helping to prove the intent behind telling Comey he "hoped" he could let the Flynn thing go. As if that weren't obvious enough already.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It's just that the head honcho did actions TO obstruct justice. The fact that the underling he was pressuring didn't succumb, or didn't catch on, or didn't get an opportunity to follow the "suggestions" of the head honcho is immaterial, I believe.
Pluvious
(4,310 posts)And all the "could" questions just put the act of firing in context ?
grantcart
(53,061 posts)That kind of settled it but if you were in doubt he confirmed it to the Russians in the WH the next day.
The only thing we are missing is "Of course I fired him, I didn't want to get caught".
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Pluvious
(4,310 posts)Think about it
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Saviolo
(3,280 posts)Here's some information from a lawyer on the meaning of the term:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029175368
It doesn't matter if Coats "felt" pressured or if there was anything actually obstructed. If Trump asked them to intervene, it is obstruction of justice.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,431 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)You have no idea what you're talking about.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He takes the position that he was not pressured to do anything, and he didn't feel pressured, and he did in fact not do anything.
The other intel officer or advisor who also testified at the same time about the same thing, also said what Coats said.
As I recall, they wouldn't confirm or deny or talk about what Trump had said to them. Same thing Sessions did.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)justice. Whether that is old news lies, I suppose, in the eye of the beholder. The WaPo story is dated yesterday, though.
Patterson
(1,529 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Neither would the other guy.
The point being...they don't want to get involved in an obstruction of justice issue. Also, they were not fired when they didn't do whatever it was that Trump asked them to do, like Comey was.
Odd...that they don't want to call Trump on trying to influence the investigation.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Not without being in violation of their oath to the constitution.
All-In
(312 posts)Who write them checks.
And fund the 100 conservative organizations that push them forward.
All the way to hell.
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)BECAUSE HE DIDN'T PAY ATTENTION IN HIS ETHICS BRIEFINGS.
Dumbass.
Enoki33
(1,587 posts)his entire life. His miscalculation was based on the fact that he has always dealt with less principled individuals.
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)is normal day to day behavior. An idiot who wasn't prepared to operate in this arena just wouldn't understand it was wrong. Or at least no wrong enough to warrant more than a warning from somebody.
In the business world you do something wrong and you usually get a letter first, and then a fine and then you move on.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,431 posts)America's Grifters. The best of the best, in the White House.
onetexan
(13,036 posts)and deliberately did so thinking because he is so bold GOPs will leave him alone and what he did won't have any consequences.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)Willful carelessness.
Rank amateurishness.
Arrogant ignorance.
Republican President Trump.
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)since he didn't get the briefings.
He's a slippery one, that Trumpy.
A life of scamming and eventually it just becomes intuitive.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Picture something like this: "You better get me outta this, Donald, or I'm gonna tell all and take you down with me!"
That would sure explain why Trump is so frantic to quash the investigation.
Doitnow
(1,103 posts)FenwayDonkey
(68 posts)If anyone will lie under oath it will be him.
Grammy23
(5,810 posts)If tRump asked any of them (Coats, Comey, etc) to make the investigation go away, even if he asked nicely/sweetly, isn't that still an attempt at obstruction of justice? If a guy goes in a bank, attempts a robbery but ultimately leaves empty handed, isn't he still guilty of attempted bank robbery? Success at the crime is not a prerequisite to being charged with a crime.
Is my logic flawed?
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)tell the CIA to obstruct the FBI, obstruction occurred whether the CIA actually obstructed the FBI or refused to obey. John Dean made the allegation, Nixon denied it, but the tapes corroborated Dean's allegations and were the final evidentiary nail in Tricky Dick's coffin.
IANAL, though.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)You don't get charged with Murder if no one died, but there are other charges you may be subject to. If you walk into the bank with the intention to rob it, chicken out, and leave, are you still guilty of attempted bank robbery? If Trump had asked a Mall Santa to make the investigation go away, would that be obstruction of justice?
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)It's still a serious crime, even if the presumed hit man is an undercover FBI agent and nobody got killed. Interesting discussion here:
https://www.quora.com/If-someone-hired-a-hitman-to-kill-someone-who-goes-to-prison-the-hitman-or-the-person-who-hired-them
MFM008
(19,806 posts)And his minions are busy undermining the special council so when they release their finding his idiot supporters will ignore it.
MedusaX
(1,129 posts)And played tiddlywinks instead of taking action to impeach
So now we have the drip drip of more supporting evidence -
clearly stated
rather than implied...
Telling house KGOP to wake the fuck up & do their job!
Justice
(7,185 posts)Why would you tell associates about it if it were no big deal.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)lips is a flat-out lie, things that don't make sense at first quickly snap into focus. To wit, Coats actually DID feel pressured. Survival in Trumpland means you lie to protect your boss.
Catherine Vincent
(34,488 posts)it sounds like Coates is trying to protect Trump saying he wasn't pressured and it was no big deal.