Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CBS Evening News leading with the Carrier Story (Original Post) Motownman78 Jun 2017 OP
I was wondering if anyone in the media was going to follow up on this still_one Jun 2017 #1
Good...people in Ohio are starting to turn on him too...thousands of auto workers laid off. Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #2
His supporters only care about Team R beating Team D. Iggo Jun 2017 #3
Bingo. tazkcmo Jun 2017 #6
Than how did we get such Motownman78 Jun 2017 #12
Gerrymandering quite simply RainCaster Jun 2017 #14
No...they've raised it to the level of a criminal conspiracy. pecosbob Jun 2017 #22
The Voting Rights Act expired in 2013, which led to the suppression of millions of votes. nt pnwmom Jun 2017 #16
Actually the VRA was renewed BUT BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #23
Thanks for the clarification. The effect was the same. Rethug states took advantage of the pnwmom Jun 2017 #24
Exactly. BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #26
No they haven't disapp. tazkcmo Jun 2017 #18
Citizens United allowed unlimited anonymous funding DBoon Jun 2017 #20
Yep Cosmocat Jun 2017 #7
I think there's a difference between supporters and voters leftstreet Jun 2017 #10
I live in Missouri, bordering Kansas. tazkcmo Jun 2017 #21
"His supporters only care about Team R beating Team D." LenaBaby61 Jun 2017 #11
And Democrats could learn the same. Dawson Leery Jun 2017 #25
If that was the case, why has his popularity dropped so much? mythology Jun 2017 #27
Are we winning yet? llmart Jun 2017 #4
Is there a link for the Carrier Story? HipChick Jun 2017 #5
I think this is it... Princess Turandot Jun 2017 #8
Here's one of many, HipChick: Leghorn21 Jun 2017 #9
Thank you! HipChick Jun 2017 #13
With no guidence from Washington and not active government, there's nothing stopping them. ffr Jun 2017 #15
His supporters only care that tRump is not a brown person or a female person. PERIOD. madinmaryland Jun 2017 #17
Still waiting for all those coal jobs too Thrill Jun 2017 #19
What is the Carrier story? I was offline for most of the day... Amaryllis Jun 2017 #28
The company whose jobs Shart-Gibbon "saved" Motownman78 Jun 2017 #29
Indiana Company Cutting Jobs erpowers Jun 2017 #31
THanks. Amaryllis Jun 2017 #32
How the hell could that money NOT have been earmarked? 7962 Jun 2017 #36
Apparently, It Happens A Great Deal erpowers Jun 2017 #38
I'd certainly go along with that 7962 Jun 2017 #39
No big deal, actually. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2017 #30
That's if they don't brush it off as "fake news" DesertRat Jun 2017 #33
He lied to them Achilleaze Jun 2017 #34
His supporters only watch Fox n2doc Jun 2017 #35
won't make a difference mikeyDE Jun 2017 #37

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
2. Good...people in Ohio are starting to turn on him too...thousands of auto workers laid off.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 06:34 PM
Jun 2017

And Pres. dumb ass said he had increased jobs.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
6. Bingo.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 06:41 PM
Jun 2017

That's what we all need to remember. Even if they did turn against Shitgibbon, it would only be to embrace another wrong wing idiot. They will never vote Democratic and are quickly being taught not even to think of liberals as human by their handlers like Limpballs and The Coltergeist.

 

Motownman78

(491 posts)
12. Than how did we get such
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 06:56 PM
Jun 2017

huge Majorities in 2006 and 2008? After 2008 there were more Dems in the house than Reps NOW. Those Dem voters from 2006 and 2008 haven't magically disappeared.

BumRushDaShow

(128,846 posts)
23. Actually the VRA was renewed BUT
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 07:47 PM
Jun 2017

the SCOTUS threw out Section 4 of the VRA in 2013 (the list of states/counties/municipalities requiring "pre-clearance" by DOJ for changes in state voting requirements), which then invalidated Section 5 (the "pre-clearance&quot rules. The argument being that the list of states hadn't been updated in a long time and Congress needed to re-do it.

This then requires arguments for VRA violations strictly citing Section 2 (discrimination based on race, color, or language group), which is basically already a Constitutional Amendment (except for the language group part which seems to point to Hispanics who can be of any race), but only after the fact (once a change has already been made that might have a negative impact, vs stopping the egregious change before it happens). However if the plaintiff can prove that the locale had recent previous deliberate discrimination in voting rules changes, they might be able to invoke Section 3 to require a one-off pre-clearance.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
24. Thanks for the clarification. The effect was the same. Rethug states took advantage of the
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 07:52 PM
Jun 2017

SCOTUS decision to pass Voter ID and other laws that suppressed millions of votes.

BumRushDaShow

(128,846 posts)
26. Exactly.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:01 PM
Jun 2017


And it has been a nightmare. However I know back when that happened, there was discussion on DU about it agreeing that the list really does need to be updated (but knowing this congress would never do it). And that's because although most of the pre-clearance locations were generally in the south, a whole pile need to be added for other parts of the country like here in PA and in OH.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
18. No they haven't disapp.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 07:33 PM
Jun 2017

They have been Diebolded, touch screened, gerrymandered, Voter ID'ed and voter roll purged and now Russian hacked and don't forger Kathleen Harrised. Also, 2006 and 2008 were brief rebounds from the minority attributable to Obama's popularity.

DBoon

(22,356 posts)
20. Citizens United allowed unlimited anonymous funding
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 07:37 PM
Jun 2017

Spend enough on propaganda and you can convince people dog poop tastes good

Cosmocat

(14,563 posts)
7. Yep
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 06:43 PM
Jun 2017

Decades of brain washing them about the evil liberal boogyman combined with a dogma of defending their never ending stream of indefensible disasters had devolved them to having no thought other than giving the middle finger to the evil liberal.

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)
10. I think there's a difference between supporters and voters
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 06:50 PM
Jun 2017

I'm not convinced his most ardent supporters even voted. They're just happy to find themselves represented by someone with the same agenda - beating back 'liberals,' 'welfare queens,' 'foreigners,' etc

I suspect his voters are an entirely different matter. They probably expect him to deliver on his fake promises

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
21. I live in Missouri, bordering Kansas.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 07:40 PM
Jun 2017

Also in a very white, suburban part of an other wise diverse city, in N. Kansas City, Mo. Lots of living, breathing, walking but not thinking Shit Gibbon voters here and they are just like the ones you see saying stupid shit on TV. They may turn on this particular GOPee-er (Not likely) but never to a DemocRat!

Maybe your interactions with them have been different but the ones I USED to talk to respond to all criticism of Their Savior with "But Killary...!".

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
11. "His supporters only care about Team R beating Team D."
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 06:54 PM
Jun 2017

Exactly.

Some will blame Pres. Obama, not the hog-in-chief

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
27. If that was the case, why has his popularity dropped so much?
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:12 PM
Jun 2017

He got elected making promises he couldn't keep about jobs and bringing back manufacturing. Obama already brought manufacturing back (we're at all time high in terms of output), but that is done more and more by automation. The inability to fulfill that promise will have a negative impact on Trump's position.

ffr

(22,669 posts)
15. With no guidence from Washington and not active government, there's nothing stopping them.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 07:23 PM
Jun 2017

Despite Trump’s criticism, companies in Charlotte are sending more jobs overseas - 06/19/17

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/article156623759.html#storylink=cpy

 

Motownman78

(491 posts)
29. The company whose jobs Shart-Gibbon "saved"
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:35 PM
Jun 2017

are being lost and the "deal" he made, well, the company took the money and invested in automation.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
31. Indiana Company Cutting Jobs
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:41 PM
Jun 2017

Do you remember when, shortly after the election, Donald Trump announced that he had completed a deal with Carrier and its parent company to keep about 1,500 jobs from leaving the United States for Mexico? Although the idea that Carrier would be layoffing hundreds of people was being whispered for a few weeks it became official yesterday. Yesterday, Carrier announced it would be laying off the people who had supposedly kept their jobs due to Trump. It was also announced that the money the company had received in the deal to keep the jobs had been used to help automate the Indiana plant.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
36. How the hell could that money NOT have been earmarked?
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 09:26 PM
Jun 2017

You dont give incentives without stipulations.
"Art of the bad deal"

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
38. Apparently, It Happens A Great Deal
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:51 AM
Jun 2017

From what I have heard and read this is standard operating procedure. The only difference with this case is that it is getting attention because Donald Trump made such a big deal about striking this deal that was supposed to prevent job lose. Companies are often given money in order to get the companies to build their stores in cities in order to bring jobs to those cities. However, it seems most of the jobs that are promised never materialize. Some people have called for these deals to have claw back options where the cities would be able to demand a return of at least some of the money given to companies if the jobs promised do not get created.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
39. I'd certainly go along with that
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 08:02 AM
Jun 2017

I have no problem with incentives, but they should go for what they're intended

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
30. No big deal, actually.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:38 PM
Jun 2017

They can find work in re-opened coal mines or the new steel mills.

Oh, wait..........

 

mikeyDE

(31 posts)
37. won't make a difference
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 10:00 PM
Jun 2017

The bulk of his supporters couldn't care less about jobs and never believed he would/could save/create them, that was just a campaign gimmick. What they care about is keeping dark-skinned people down and people with vaginas out and building a wall. It's really that simple.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CBS Evening News leading ...