General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDouble-talking Tim Ryan viciously bashes his party & mentor Pelosi now he's being exposed
During his interview with CNN, Tim Ryan also decided to lambaste his former mentor Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who has been one of the strongest, most persistent, resilient and relentless forces against Donald Trump, his cronies and the self-serving GOP. Tim Ryan may be able to justify his sour grapes for Pelosi even though when he arrived in Washington, she hooked him up with a slot on the House Democratic Steering Committee which he used to advance his career. But now shes hurt his feelings. She crushed him in last Novembers internal Democratic Party House Leader bid.
When Don Lemon asked Tim Ryan if he thought Pelosi was more toxic than Trump, Ryan actually said yes.
Given her integrity and the great respect Pelosi has earned from her colleagues over years in office, Ryans statement couldnt have been more repulsive. For Ryan to even compare Leader Pelosi to a lying, scamming, hateful, tax-evading thug and sexual predator like Trumpis incredulous. And then to say shes more toxic than Trump, on any level, is outrageous, especially coming from a Democratic lawmaker. You see, Tim Ryan thinks he could do a better job than Pelosi even though Republicans have the majority in the House, Senate, Oval Office and now Supreme Court. Ryan seems to think he has the magic answer when in realityno Democratic leader has a fair shot under current circumstances.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/6/24/1674719/-Double-talking-Tim-Ryan-viciously-bashes-his-party-mentor-Nancy-Pelosi-now-he-s-being-exposed?Salzillo
mcar
(42,307 posts)SMH.
Cha
(297,188 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)but you point out a failing of many Repubs, too, especially Trump.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Six years, 60 votes, and they still can't agree on and pass a coherent health care bill. That's not even considering trying to pass a health care bill that the public will like.
tRump has a team of three: he, himself, and him.
The tRump gang is not much of a team. They are so clueless about governing that Ivanka despairs about the nastiness in Washington and Jared thinks he can solve the 2,500 year old MidEast conundrum by showing up in preppy clothing. They are so amateurish and arrogant they don't even ask for advice from previous Secretaries of State like Kerry and Hillary did.
Steve Bannon is a tool of the Mercers and beholden to his own racist fantasies about minimal government. He thinks he can tear it down from within and rebuild it as pre-Theodore-Roosevelt robber baron white capitalist paradise. He does have some help from the cabinet.
Republican Trump does not have any Republicons on his team. The Party is more & more abandoning him.
Reince Priebus is the only professional there and therefore is the one who says the least. He is there to cover the Republicon Party's collusion from within the WH so that he can cover his ass. He's the most team player inside and outside the WH of all the Republicons.
Ryan can't control his caucus. He's no good as a coach or as a captain or at inspiring. His caucus are running around like mice with their tails chopped off. FOUR CLOSE SHAVES in special elections have got them scared shitless about 2018.
McCONnell has more than Ryan at stake in the Russia collusion treason and coverup. So he's not much of a team player.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)Russian pay outs and are not held to the same accountability as the Democratic Party.
Good points.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Alice11111
(5,730 posts)things, not just 2 or 3, that shave .5pc to 1 or 2pc off everywhere and everything possible. That is their strategy, together with having a simple logos. They fire up the base with lies of hate and fear, plus pull in some racists & stir up Islamophobia.
Voila=formula for Repub winning
The question is at what point are we going to have the equivalent of a missile defense system to bust them up before they take hold.
We also, of course, need a strong message ourselves, a good offensive strategy.
It's all pretty obvious. Not brain surgery.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)I think the majority of the nation agrees with it and hears it. Even with Clinton losing, he took all that and more to beat her and still she had 3 million more. Her message was heard. Further, she was also going against someone that had no rules he had to follow and she proceeded the two term Democratic president. Unprecedented to win, yet it took all that to beat her.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)which has been one of their favorite games for nearly 30 years.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Why doesn't he just switch parties while he's at it?
OhNo-Really
(3,985 posts)Ok, I watched House of Cards.
Politics is a nasty game for the truly tough.
This nitwit best be pristine if he dares assault a seasoned pro.
bitterross
(4,066 posts)One doesn't go on national TV and trash talk a competent leader of the minority. That is beyond rude and selfish.
MBS
(9,688 posts)He's completely lost me.
Sometimes my party drives me NUTS.
Here it is, at a time so vital to send a powerful, united message, not only to win back Congress and to remove Trump from office (or at least to diminish his power), but also - yes, it's this important - to save our democracy.
But, no, the same internecine @#$%.
Come on, Dems: get it together for once.
bitterross
(4,066 posts)Sure, there ARE times when the leadership should be questioned. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz was a great example of incompetent leadership. Pelosi is not.
The statistical progress we've made in solid red districts is phenomenal.
I agree with all of this, too.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Polar opposites those two. Just wanted to add that when you do feel the need to question your leadership, the best way not to is publicly and thus this idiot exposes his incompetence.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)talking to. Probably they should punish him--move him to an insignificant position on an obscure committee. Maybe not fund his next campaign. Maybe find a chgallenger for his seat.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Perhaps he's thinking of becoming an independent?
George II
(67,782 posts)...."rookie" Rice from New York. She's been in Congress for two years yet she thinks she knows more than Nancy Pelosi?
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)who they played over and over last week singing Pelosi's praises after which she concludes it's time for her to go, past her shelf life?
George II
(67,782 posts)...but saw her over and over again claiming that Pelosi should be replaced. This from a 2-year member of the House.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Isn't there a better D who can run in his district? Betcha he would then ask Nancy P. to help fundraise for him.
George II
(67,782 posts)trueblue2007
(17,217 posts)Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)More Dharma talks for you Mr. Ryan. You need to practice what you preach.
Hekate
(90,671 posts)...as the Next Big Hope because (whisper, mumble, he's a white male).
The more I see of him, the worse he looks for us.
Thanks for posting this from Daily Kos.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)You are welcome.
Cha
(297,188 posts)he challenged Nancy for the minority leadership and lost.
House Democrats Re-Elect Nancy Pelosi As Minority Leader
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/30/503902535/house-democrats-re-elect-nancy-pelosi-as-minority-leader
Hekate
(90,671 posts)And a turd.
Cha
(297,188 posts)sour grapish.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)pirateshipdude
(967 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)He's a Republican who's infiltrated the Democratic party to destroy from within.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)A good number of Democrats are supporting Ryan.
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)Why would our party fracture now, of all times. The R's are vulnerable because their crazy is showing. We did not lose the election, it was rigged. That seems to be a given now. Our numbers are strong in these run-offs, but the DSCC doesn't seem to know shit from shinola (wtf).
These Dems like Ryan, that want to take over, seem too far to the right. I will admit I have not researched this guy or his followers, but we should not be attacking each other. Especially not until this whole political and criminal mess in the Republican Party is settled and we see what rectifications are made, if any.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)dear friend! Mahalo Cha!
Cha
(297,188 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)It's not only Nancy Pelosi he's targeting, it's the Democratic Party. I don't know what his agenda is (destroy the party, get attention, raise $$?) but he certainly has one, and it's toxic.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)That would be the best thing he could do. Right?
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)or trying to. I think most of the party has more sense than to listen to this asshole.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)What are Democrats suppose to do? There is unprecedented lying, cheating, stealing, not following laws and rules.
Democrats cannot get away with this. We cannot get away with anything. This is how the Republicans and media has set up our world.
Not only are the Republicans allowed to behave like this, we see certain Democrats allowed when attacking the Democratic base.
So, when you say " He should leave and take half the Party with him?", I think, no. We should demand he have to walk the line of honesty to, along with the rest of the party. Pelosi, Obama, DWS, Lewis, Booker, Harris and so many more Democrats would be fried by Democrats if they behaved this way.
Me.
(35,454 posts)The so-called People's Project and half the party is beyond anything they could dream of, he and his 12 fellow conspirators, meeting secretly in Rice's office.
blue-wave
(4,352 posts)Hardly think so, but if so they were never democrats in the first place. This anti-Pelosi, anti-Obama, anti-Hillary and oh yeah, anti-Bernie stuff in our party must stop. We need to be united now more than ever. Our adversaries understand this political reality. It's time to stop the divisive madness.
MBS
(9,688 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)Of course, they only measure success by the number of House and Senate seats lost or gained, I suppose?
If Democrats do not take back the House in 2018, then I would agree with those that say it is time for her to step down. This is not a good time to be fighting divisive battles. She has been a great Speaker and Leader.
But in 2018, it may be time for the Party to go in a new direction? I'm not sure this is the best time to fight about it. There are bigger battles to fight, in my opinion.
Somebody has to fight for this country. It is going down the crapper rapidly.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)We see it over and over in our elections. So, for a small group demand that we go a new direction when we see our direction more effective, progressive and viable, it simply is not going to work. Right? This does not make sense to me to demand a new direction when the base is saying we do not agree with them.
We try to compromise. We try to work with the other group, repeatedly. That seems to be hurting us. So what would be the answer from this point?
kentuck
(111,089 posts)You are not entitled to have everyone agree with it.
I would agree that now is not the time to fight this battle.
Who is the Party going to support when Bernie Sanders chooses Tim Ryan as his running mate in 2020? We don't know what is going to happen?
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)pirateshipdude
(967 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)The Democratic Party is very fond of Nancy Pelosi.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)???
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"time for the Party to go in a new direction?:
What specific direction would that be; on what is that direction measured, and what new concepts/templates/platforms would be in place that are not already?
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)mikeyDE
(31 posts)Does he see prison and the Tea Party in his future?
Mr.Bill
(24,284 posts)not give him any funds for his next campaign. Let him finance it with bake sales.
Find someone to primary him, and give them the funding. Show him how team politics works.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Steven Maurer
(459 posts) Attacking the moral integrity of the Democratic party/DNC? Check.
Proposes throwing critical members of the Democratic coalition under the bus? Check.
Over the top rhetoric? Check.
Holding Democrats to impossible popularity standards so as to declare us all a "failure"? Check.
Threatens to split the party and/or throw the election to the GOP if he doesn't get his way? Check.
At least Sanders had a consistent message - even if it is one that the public rejected.
nikibatts
(2,198 posts)to contend with people like Tim Ryan and others. We get knocked down but we get back up. An no matter who is in control at the top of government (it's always better if we are in control better for country, that is) we continue to make a difference within the communities where we live and work. We just can't give and we shouldn't give in. It's the fight that SHOULD keep us together. After we win and are on top again we can take the time to clean our house of those who would do us harm.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)It usually takes them a few years but they are elephants. They have long memories.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)However, if we are going to take back the House, we need people like him and districts like his.
Pelosi, while effective and good at her job, is poison to swing voters. This week proved it. She also represents one of the most liberal districts in the country and arguably the most liberal city in the country. San Francisco is lovely to visit (went in 2003) but like any other city, has it's problems. Fair or not, the city represents overpriced real estate, the tech industry taking over the world, and LGBT rights. Someone in GA-06 might not identify with any of that and doesn't see it as 'American."
IMO Ryan's message is part of a 50 state strategy. Someone in KS, MT, GA, or SC will probably relate to a guy like him more than Pelosi. The lesson of 2016 is that we can't write off 'flyover country."
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)their effectiveness in her position she sits?
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)What I'm trying to get at is that we need people like Tim Ryan and the district he represents in order to be competitive at the national level.
Yes NYC, LA, SF, Philly, etc have a lot of population, but it is not enough just to win in big cities. This is what a 50 state strategy is all about.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)to our party.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)What are they afraid of? What would a Democrat like Ryan do that would cause so much damage? I don't think anyone is trying to subtract from the Party, but rather add to it.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)I've traveled all over the country for campaigns (9 states). What works in one does not necessarily work in another.
If we are going to be a big tent party we must embrace our differences, and yes running Blue Dogs in appropriate districts is part of that.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)kentuck
(111,089 posts)To say that she was "toxic" in some places is probably true? But, Republicans do that to all strong Democrats when they have years to "brand" them. With FOX News and Talk Radio, they are very effective. It doesn't mean she hasn't done a good job. Just like Hillary was branded after many years. She may as well have been the Devil. That's the way the opposition works.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)the answer would be, of course not.
Pretty Incredulous.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)...across this nation. There were districts where Donald Trump was much more popular than Nancy Pelosi, I would bet. It's not comparing Nancy to Trump in the personal manner that you state. It's saying that she is "toxic" in a political sense in some districts across this nation. The GOP has worked hard to make her toxic. That is no surprise. She has been branded by her opponents in the GOP and the Democrats have been unable to prevent it. That is the reality that many Democrats see.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)Democratic disaffection. I say that because he's not actually getting to the root of the problem. He's trying to tac our message to an "economic" one, which really can be boiled down to saying "jobs, jobs, jobs..." He seems disinterested in talking about issues of campaign finance or voter suppression, or corporate greed, and given the opportunity, he backed away from Sanders style messaging in favor of something far more milquetoast . From my limited exposure(please correct me if I'm off here), he seems to want us to wear our diversity less on our sleeve, and sell an establishment message of standard governance around the policies of job creation.
The problem is he wants to still be an insider. He wants to try to sell people who do not trust the government, and at least somewhat for good reason, that this minor shake-up will amount to actual change. We need leaders who call the system broken. We don't need the ones who pretend its a simple matter of shifting our focus that will solve things.We need a populist message that breaks through the standard allegiances...one that gives people across the spectrum of the bottom 99 percent, common cause. We need a common boogie man, and Democrats continue to refuse to brand corporate influence that boogieman.
All that said, I agree, demanding that our politicians walk in lock-step and never criticize or state hard truths(or at least their version of it) is silly, and it is frankly, not a winning strategy. We aren't working with the same voter base that republicans are working with. That will never fly with us.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)As If Folks Cannot Have A Different Point of View Than Their Own --- and be a Democrat. Interesting fall out from the era of Trump.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)So again, if folks disagree, it seems some folks believe they cannot be a Democrat -- which is TOTALLY not true at all.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)Maybe it is so foreign in our culture today, where we disagree an idea and not resort to the worst of who we are.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)And we will agree to strongly disagree here.
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)disrespectful and everything of who Trump is.
andym
(5,443 posts)delisen
(6,043 posts)actually might like to have those tech problems San Francisco has. Ga-05 does not have much problem with LGBT.
Overpriced real estate is traditionally how Ga-6 makes money.
My guess is that Youngstown, Ohio would really like some of these problems that bring in money.
Youngstown started it depression in the 1960. I remember a group from there called Self-Management in the Workplace wrapped up in industrial issues. I visited in the late 80's and did not see much economic improvement.
Maybe they should do a sister city project with Atlanta or San Francisco.
Maybe you should visit Ga-6 and 5--both booming.
AllaN01Bear
(18,191 posts)wryter2000
(46,039 posts)How many of these types will continue to fool some of us?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)He might find himself in trouble with his constituency if he doesn't.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)AJT
(5,240 posts)the Rolling Stone was on and said he ran into Tim Ryan one night at a bar and he was coked up. Did anyone catch the name of the Rolling Stone writer?
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)Trial_By_Fire
(624 posts)andym
(5,443 posts)under relentless GOP attack. Rep Pelosi does have an awful favorability nationally (28.6% in the latest aggregate of poll http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/nancy-pelosi-favorable-rating), but Senate Minority Leader Senator Reid also had even more atrocious polling (23%). In fact, Check Schumer has a only a 26% national favorability rating-- the difference is that his unfavorability number is only 36% compared to Pelosi's of 49%. The longer a politician remains a congressional leader, the more the impact of GOP attacks. Basically having unpopular leaders is the rule rather the exception.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)"The longer a politician remains a congressional leader, the more the impact of GOP attacks. Basically having unpopular leaders is the rule rather the exception."
They were after Hillary for thirty years. She was very toxic in a lot of the country. It was not her fault. It was the GOP attacks over many, many years.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)He's not correct, despite making a few decent points, but let's pretend he is.
One: one of the ways that Republicans have protected their brand so successfully is because they don't have these discussions or air this laundry in public. Maybe the rank and file do (like the Tea Party), but keep shit like this out of the public eye.
Two: If the Republicans hate and fear Nancy Pelosi so goddamned much that they'll spend millions attacking her, then she must be doing something right. I think that anyone who makes Republicans angry and afraid needs more time in the spotlight, not less.
If any of you ever find yourself agreeing with Trump, McConnell, or the Koch Brothers, maybe step back, take deep breaths, and reevaluate your line of thinking.
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)Are we going to throw them out or do we need them too much at this time?
He's from Ohio, a place that is rapidly becoming more and more wingnutty.
One of the moderate Dems needs to sit him down for a "talk."
pirateshipdude
(967 posts)Hey, can you explain "Joe Manchin". I am uninformed.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)If he were, he'd get laughed at
Cha
(297,188 posts)Response to pirateshipdude (Original post)
Post removed
Cha
(297,188 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)pirateshipdude
(967 posts)Thank-you.
Cha
(297,188 posts)still_one
(92,187 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,290 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)ecstatic
(32,701 posts)Who told him his week long anti-Pelosi tour was a good idea? He's shown himself to be completely unfit. Divisive as hell. Just stupid. Bye.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)for some reason. Are we sure he isn't a repug? He needs to STFU.
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)There is a place in our party for the blue collar rust belt types that Tim Ryan represents but it's not a reason to bash Pelosi or any of the coastal or urban liberals. I'm not sure what is being gained by that. I used to think he was a rising star in our party.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)It's also weaselry. Pelosi certainly is a boogeyman to Republicans, but that's another measure of her effectiveness.