Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,964 posts)
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 11:42 AM Jun 2017

Nearly 250 potential jurors dismissed from selection for Martin Shkreli's securities fraud trial

Source: ABC News

Nearly 250 potential jurors dismissed from selection for Martin Shkreli's securities fraud trial

By JULIA JACOBO - Jun 28, 2017, 9:52 AM ET

Multiple potential jurors who were dismissed from the securities fraud trial against Martin Shkreli had expressed strong objections toward the former pharmaceutical CEO notorious for his drastic increase in the price of a life-saving drug.

Jury selection for 34-year-old Shkreli’s trial has proved difficult, with nearly 250 potential jurors dismissed in just two days for the securities fraud trial in New York.

A judge denied requests from Shkreli's defense team to start the selection process over and ban reporters from listening in on sidebars, The Associated Press reported. The judge did agree to re-question about 40 people who qualified for the jury pool to see if they were influenced by Shkreli's publicity.

Of 178 jurors, 47 were selected on Monday, while 16 out of 69 jurors were selected voir dire on Tuesday.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/250-potential-jurors-dismissed-selection-martin-shkrelis-securities/story?id=48281194
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nearly 250 potential jurors dismissed from selection for Martin Shkreli's securities fraud trial (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2017 OP
I believe in fair trials and the justice system and blah blah... blogslut Jun 2017 #1
I don't think I could be impartial. hamsterjill Jun 2017 #2
This may be one of those cases gratuitous Jun 2017 #3

hamsterjill

(15,224 posts)
2. I don't think I could be impartial.
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 12:20 PM
Jun 2017

He deserves a fair trial. I wouldn't be capable of assuring that I could be impartial because in my opinion, he's guilty and I want him to be put in jail.

Honesty is the best policy, and I'm sure they will eventually find suitable jurors. WHEN he goes to jail, I want it to be because he was found guilty in a just system.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. This may be one of those cases
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 12:29 PM
Jun 2017

This may be one of those cases where the court should just take the first 12 jurors in the pool and seat them, unless they have a personal connection to a party or attorney in the trial (e.g., blood relative, good friend of long standing, justifiably angry ex-wife, etc.). Finding people who haven't heard of Shkreli or who haven't formed an opinion of his public actions and statements is going to be pretty tough, but the defendant shouldn't hold things up just because he's been an unrelenting public jerk.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nearly 250 potential juro...