Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The_jackalope

(1,660 posts)
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 11:11 PM Jun 2017

SIGINT, SIGINT - who's got the SIGINT?

Reince Priebus:

Sergei Kislyak was under surveillance by the NSA throughout 2016. The NSA has SIGINT on Reince Priebus resulting from this, that is extensive, and now in possession of the FBI.

However, in terms of foreign allies, Saudi Arabia has recent SIGINT on Reince Priebus. According to our impeccable sources, Mr. Priebus decided to ‘run’ when in Saudi Arabia. He panicked when he learned on Air Force One what the SIGINT gained from surveillance of Kislyak at the RNC amounted to. I exclusively reported there was a RICO case against the entire GOP as a body; this is because they accepted, via Reince Priebus, washed Russian money, sources say. The way in which this was to be laundered was recorded at the RNC, sources say. Saudi Arabian intelligence picked up a voice recording of a panicked Mr. Priebus, fresh off the plane, claiming he would seek asylum, sources say. He was under a UFAP warrant, sources with links to the U.S. Marshals report, and was immediately brought back to America under compulsion by Air Marshals who had been placed on Air Force One, these sources say, less than 24 hours later.

Mr. Priebus’s quick return was covered by a passive mainstream media who did no investigating into why he was brought home. I knew why Priebus had returned but withheld that report at the request of sources with links to non-US intelligence. I have now been granted permission and even encouraged to report everything relating to allied intelligence on Trump Russian suspects.

https://patribotics.blog/2017/06/29/exclusive-reince-wanted-to-run-allied-sigint-on-trumps-treasonweasels/

Well, that would explain a lot. Back in February, John Schindler tweeted this:


Louise would appear to be the beneficiary of some of the launch codes. Check in for Part Deux tomorrow.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SIGINT, SIGINT - who's got the SIGINT? (Original Post) The_jackalope Jun 2017 OP
What does SIGINT mean? CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2017 #1
Signals intelligence -- what can be picked up with radio technology. politicat Jun 2017 #3
Thank you! My education continues. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2017 #9
Signals Intelligence Liberal In Texas Jun 2017 #4
Very interesting! I thank you so much. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2017 #10
So can this be verified? Kilgore Jun 2017 #2
We're not at that stage with this information yet. The_jackalope Jun 2017 #6
What is this? A spy novel? n/t Liberal In Texas Jun 2017 #5
It can't be. It's too outrageous for a novel. nt The_jackalope Jun 2017 #7
I'd have trouble getting this classed as Political Satire of the Harvard Lampoon sort. politicat Jun 2017 #11
Reliable or not, I still enjoy reading this stuff. Rince has been kind of in the background lately. NBachers Jun 2017 #8

politicat

(9,808 posts)
3. Signals intelligence -- what can be picked up with radio technology.
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 11:21 PM
Jun 2017

Which now includes laser listening and several other means.

I enjoy Louise's fairy tales. Like most interesting narratives, they have some emotional truth at the core, but emotional truth isn't fact.

Still... if the universe actually listens to us brief illusions of consciousness... I hope someone has it.

The_jackalope

(1,660 posts)
6. We're not at that stage with this information yet.
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 11:26 PM
Jun 2017

We're still at the leak stage. Verification will probably come during the trials.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
11. I'd have trouble getting this classed as Political Satire of the Harvard Lampoon sort.
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 01:02 AM
Jun 2017

A thriller? No way. Each of the individual pieces are just... so ridiculous. Ludicrous. If this was a book instead of reality, the editor would be perfectly reasonable to say the weight of suspension of disbelief is just too great, even for satire.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SIGINT, SIGINT - who's go...