HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I can now add Oregon to t...

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 07:47 PM

I can now add Oregon to the list of states that said NO

Yesterday, I emailed our Republican SOS's office (most of our state government is in Democratic hands) and requested that my personal voter information not be shared with the Kobach fishing expedition. This afternoon I received a response with a copy of the letter SOS Richardson sent back. He said NO! And he talked about how great our automatic registration and 100% vote by mail system works.

13 replies, 2588 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 13 replies Author Time Post
Reply I can now add Oregon to the list of states that said NO (Original post)
leftieNanner Jun 2017 OP
ciaobaby Jun 2017 #1
GP6971 Jun 2017 #2
pnwmom Jun 2017 #11
ciaobaby Jul 2017 #12
pnwmom Jul 2017 #13
Matthew28 Jun 2017 #3
woodsprite Jun 2017 #4
Sneederbunk Jun 2017 #5
gratuitous Jun 2017 #6
Cha Jun 2017 #7
Mme. Defarge Jun 2017 #8
Squinch Jun 2017 #9
central scrutinizer Jun 2017 #10

Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 07:58 PM

1. Now if only Washington State will follow.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ciaobaby (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:01 PM

2. I thought I saw that they had

but it's not showing up on any of the recent lists. Off I go to email the SOS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ciaobaby (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 10:25 PM

11. Washington State LEAD. They were on the list of 24 states that didn't include Oregon. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #11)

Sat Jul 1, 2017, 01:09 AM

12. i am confused - it appears WA State is sending information....

 

Re: Washington State: Wyman, a Republican, said on Thursday she would consider the request over the weekend, but on Friday she tweeted the state will send the commission names, addresses and dates of birth of registered voters because that information is available to the public.

http://q13fox.com/2017/06/30/washington-state-will-send-some-voter-data-to-trump-commission-but-not-confidential-information/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ciaobaby (Reply #12)

Sat Jul 1, 2017, 01:38 AM

13. Yes, there's been conflicting info. But she isn't sending much of the information they asked for.

I'm disappointed to hear that our birth dates are public, because that is useful info for people involved in identity theft.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:03 PM

3. Great news!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:03 PM

4. Didn't see Delaware on the list of states, so I just wrote this to Gov. Carney

Gov. Carney,

I am requesting that Delaware join the 20+ states that are refusing to fully comply and turn over voter information beyond what is already publicly available. There is no reason they need to know every citizen's election attendance back to 2006, social security numbers, or other PNPI information. As this last election has demonstrated, they are not planning on investigating voter fraud (which is very rare), but have every intention of using this information to purge and manipulate voter rolls across the country. While the information doesn't include actual votes cast, it will show that a person voted in the Democratic or Republican primary. In a closed primary state such as DE, this is troubling. Votes are between the voters and the ballot box! We should all be concerned as to how our own government will use such information. Considering the news over the last few months, we should also be concerned how the Russian government could use such information.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:08 PM

5. What are the usual suspects such as Ohio and Florida doing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:20 PM

6. Glad to hear it

I was a bit concerned because Oregon's one and only Republican statewide elected official is the Secretary of State.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:23 PM

7. Awesome! Mahalo, leftie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:25 PM

8. Woot!

You knew we would (say no).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:27 PM

9. That Oregon system should be what everyone does. You guys do it right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 09:41 PM

10. Not exactly

SALEM, Ore. Oregon's chief election official on Friday told President Donald Trump's commission investigating allegations of voter fraud that it could receive a statewide list of voters for $500, just like anyone else.

http://projects.registerguard.com/apf/ore/or-voting-commission-oregon/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread