Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Foamfollower

(1,097 posts)
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:33 AM Jul 2017

It's official. Hillary Clinton was NOT running against Donald Trump.

Hillary Clinton was forced to run against the concerted effort and power of every intelligence agency under the control of the Russian Government.

And she damn near won any way.

I don't EVER want to hear the bullshit nonsense that she wasn't a good candidate. She was a brilliant candidate. Nobody could have won under those conditions and nobody else would have come as close to winning.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's official. Hillary Clinton was NOT running against Donald Trump. (Original Post) Foamfollower Jul 2017 OP
Exactly! n/t Evergreen Emerald Jul 2017 #1
I'm for walking and chewing gum at the same time BeyondGeography Jul 2017 #2
No one is "eliminating that she made mistakes." ehrnst Jul 2017 #10
Remember when everyone laughed when she said; 'massive DK504 Jul 2017 #24
The OP would apparently have the assessment stop at "she was a brilliant candidate" BeyondGeography Jul 2017 #25
She was a brilliant candidate and up against a lot of forces, from all directions. pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #27
Even 'brilliant" people make mistakes. She is damned as "weak" because she wasn't ehrnst Jul 2017 #32
Yeah, sure, ok BeyondGeography Jul 2017 #33
What do you find laughable? (nt) ehrnst Jul 2017 #34
Yep, she turned out to be correct about the "massive right wing conspiracy" ehrnst Jul 2017 #29
She also had some pretty serious successes, like provoking Donald Trump at all three debates StevieM Jul 2017 #35
She's a superb debater; Obama debated her 20 times and the best he could do was draw BeyondGeography Jul 2017 #38
Facts argue otherwise. Eom pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #41
"The Blue wall crumbled on her watch" ehrnst Jul 2017 #49
I disagree. The FBI obliterated her reputation with their illegitimate and dishonest tactics. StevieM Jul 2017 #54
So you keep alleging sans any objective evidence. LanternWaste Jul 2017 #57
Bushing strawman ... She didn't have to be perfect to win YCHDT Jul 2017 #68
ALL those stooges duped by the Ruskies jmg257 Jul 2017 #3
Yep. It appears only Hillary supporters weren't duped. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2017 #11
Which sort of makes sense. Those on the fence had just more reasons to go elsewhere. jmg257 Jul 2017 #28
Lots of bot posts being shared from Left wing social media ehrnst Jul 2017 #30
I believe she DID win. Literally as well as figuratively. Brainstormy Jul 2017 #4
Thank you!. . . .n/t annabanana Jul 2017 #5
Let's not forget lib-ruhl Jul 2017 #6
HRC won. drumpf continues and will ultimately lose everything. democratisphere Jul 2017 #7
Had it not been for Comey, she would have won -- under Electoral College rules -- anyway. Hoyt Jul 2017 #8
she did win. election stolen. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #9
She WON by over 3 MILLION votes. Only our slave era EC system gave a different outcome FailureToCommunicate Jul 2017 #12
And also, let's stop blaming Bernie as well. retrowire Jul 2017 #13
Nobody is doing that. NurseJackie Jul 2017 #14
Not totally true. I do. Amimnoch Jul 2017 #16
Contributed. NurseJackie Jul 2017 #19
fair 'nuff. Amimnoch Jul 2017 #23
:-) NurseJackie Jul 2017 #31
Strange, but nobody on this thread mentioned Bernie NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #37
Me. I do. It's why I mentioned him. retrowire Jul 2017 #40
But why bring it up when the thread isn't about him, at all? NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #42
Because I feel that he is relevant. retrowire Jul 2017 #44
LOL! NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #46
Disrespectful. retrowire Jul 2017 #50
LOL! NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #55
Children love digging holes, I get it. Nt retrowire Jul 2017 #56
Yawwwn NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #63
They get tired too! Lol nt retrowire Jul 2017 #64
Once upon a time, there were gossipy attempts to connect Bernie to the Russians . . . Petrushka Jul 2017 #48
Russian informants are real. retrowire Jul 2017 #51
JPR? I've seen DUers refer to "JPR" but . . . Petrushka Jul 2017 #53
They're actually still at it. beam me up scottie Jul 2017 #61
Sad to say . . . but . . . some old Democrat "friends" on Facebook . . . Petrushka Jul 2017 #67
Bernie isn't blameless either. Maven Jul 2017 #59
Well I didn't say he didn't do anything retrowire Jul 2017 #60
I can't get into it, because that would be refighting the primaries Maven Jul 2017 #65
Plz PM me then. Nt retrowire Jul 2017 #66
No regrets. Hillary didn't fail, America did. nt oasis Jul 2017 #15
She did win.. 3 million votes mountain grammy Jul 2017 #17
She DID win... it was stolen n/t secondwind Jul 2017 #18
And 62 million idiot racist fuckheads voted for Russia. Orrex Jul 2017 #20
Russia and Putin were the real opponents Gothmog Jul 2017 #21
Absolutely! Mrs. Overall Jul 2017 #22
She won the election. She lost the counting. DFW Jul 2017 #26
I agree that she was a great candidate. The post-election analysis is nonsense. StevieM Jul 2017 #36
a lesson in crime bora13 Jul 2017 #39
+1000! mcar Jul 2017 #43
EXACTLY! niyad Jul 2017 #45
Trump ran against a splatterpunk caricature of Hillary Clinton. n/t Orsino Jul 2017 #47
Clinton won by more than 3 million votes. onecaliberal Jul 2017 #52
I agree with you except when you said she nearly won. She won. It was stolen lunamagica Jul 2017 #58
And against most of the MSM triron Jul 2017 #62
+1 YCHDT Jul 2017 #69

BeyondGeography

(39,345 posts)
2. I'm for walking and chewing gum at the same time
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:39 AM
Jul 2017

Yes, she was jobbed. Yes, she made some pretty bad mistakes. One fact doesn't eliminate the other.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
10. No one is "eliminating that she made mistakes."
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:59 AM
Jul 2017

Stating the obvious fact that she she soundly won the popular vote, despite the facts of statistical improbability of a party holding the WH for more than 8 consecutive years, 25 years of false smears by the GOP, and the efforts of the Kremlin does not = saying that she didn't make mistakes.

Is that clearer?

DK504

(3,847 posts)
24. Remember when everyone laughed when she said; 'massive
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:31 AM
Jul 2017

right wing conspiracy'?

All campaigns make mistakes, but to say she ran her campaign into the ground rankles.... How is a campaign supposed to deal with political issues and an enemy governemnt going after all at the same time. Bernie got her to move to a bit m ore to the left, but she still was penalized for not being Bernie. Those that didn't vote or cast protest votes were one of the major downfalls in her loss. Depsite the fact Russia got into our voting machines, she still got more votes.

She was Sisyphus and she is still being raked over the coals by democrats.

BeyondGeography

(39,345 posts)
25. The OP would apparently have the assessment stop at "she was a brilliant candidate"
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:35 AM
Jul 2017

That's what I was responding to. Your points are well taken.

 

pirateshipdude

(967 posts)
27. She was a brilliant candidate and up against a lot of forces, from all directions.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:44 AM
Jul 2017

Clinton ran a tight, well run, organized campaign. She left very little for the other side to use against her. Perfect? When have we ever demanded perfect and what in the world would that even look like?

Never had we had the need to address our candidates that have run such a brilliant campaign, faced with all kinds of manners as Clinton, repeat constantly that she and her campaigned was deeply flawed. Demanded she and every person that talks about the events repeated acknowledge and apologize for her huge errors, of insignificance. Seeing what Clinton faced.

I find all this ridiculous.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
32. Even 'brilliant" people make mistakes. She is damned as "weak" because she wasn't
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:53 AM
Jul 2017

"the RIGHT woman," in other words, not the first choice of the white straight men in the party. Any normal mistake was blown way bigger than would be for a male candidate.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
35. She also had some pretty serious successes, like provoking Donald Trump at all three debates
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:20 AM
Jul 2017

and getting him to look crazy.

A lot of her so-called mistakes are just the media piling on. Some are pure fiction.

Had the election taken place 11 days earlier she would have won decisively. The illegitimate FBI letter to Chaffetz changed all that.

BeyondGeography

(39,345 posts)
38. She's a superb debater; Obama debated her 20 times and the best he could do was draw
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:28 AM
Jul 2017

every now and then. But the blue wall crumbled on her watch and without relitigating the campaign she bears a lot of responsibility for that.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
54. I disagree. The FBI obliterated her reputation with their illegitimate and dishonest tactics.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 01:58 PM
Jul 2017

No candidate could have survived what they did to her.

To what ever extent it was unique to her it was about the way that they could attribute all sorts of imaginary power to a former first lady.

I don't believe our loss had anything to do with campaign strategy or the issues.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
57. So you keep alleging sans any objective evidence.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 03:02 PM
Jul 2017

"she bears a lot of responsibility for that..."

So you keep alleging sans any objective evidence. No doubt, a great bias prevents you from doing so, though I'm certain your rationalize will be anything but...

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
3. ALL those stooges duped by the Ruskies
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:39 AM
Jul 2017

Into voting for someone else, most for such a disaster as trump.

Foolish.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
28. Which sort of makes sense. Those on the fence had just more reasons to go elsewhere.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:45 AM
Jul 2017

Fake news, Comey BS, etc. confirmed their doubts?

lib-ruhl

(127 posts)
6. Let's not forget
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:52 AM
Jul 2017

the ones who couldn't be bothered with voting because they thought it wouldn't matter or make a difference. If them fuckers aren't out in full force in 2018 and 2020 with whats going on now, then I don't know what will.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
13. And also, let's stop blaming Bernie as well.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:07 AM
Jul 2017

He did what a competitor should do. He gave her competition. She still came out on top so, yeah.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
16. Not totally true. I do.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:17 AM
Jul 2017

I generally don't post about it but I do. Not ALL blame, as there's other factors that played into it, but as close as it was, if any of the factors (of which this was one) that played into it were removed, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
37. Strange, but nobody on this thread mentioned Bernie
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:26 AM
Jul 2017

Except, of course you. Who the hell CARES about Sanders?

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
40. Me. I do. It's why I mentioned him.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:36 AM
Jul 2017

Just a statement. If you carry it into something further that's your own actions. It was just my opinion outright. Hillary won. Bernie not to blame. Problem?

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
42. But why bring it up when the thread isn't about him, at all?
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:42 AM
Jul 2017

There are plenty of threads honoring Bernie around, after all.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
44. Because I feel that he is relevant.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:47 AM
Jul 2017

There's a list of things people blame for her loss. Bernie is often on that list when he shouldn't be.

Problem? You honestly seem triggered at the mention of his name in an opinion that wholeheartedly agrees with the OP. There is no conflict in this opinion of mine.

Check your feelings.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
50. Disrespectful.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 12:50 PM
Jul 2017

That's expected. What a waste of time it is to be indirectly accused of ulterior motives and asked for an explanation only to be laughed at when you point out the paranoia is a bit too herky jerky.

I'd expect to be among adults in this forum.

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
48. Once upon a time, there were gossipy attempts to connect Bernie to the Russians . . .
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 12:16 PM
Jul 2017

. . . by bringing up his honeymoon in Russia and by making a big to-do about Bernie's campaign manager being of Russian origin.
Why, I wondered at that time, were fingers being pointed at Russia?

When some people went so far as to suggest that Russian trolls were posting messages on DU, my reaction was, "Oh, for God's sake, what next? Unbelievable! "

Anyway . . .

In my opinion, Bernie wasn't to blame for anything but running a good campaign against a better campaigner.




retrowire

(10,345 posts)
51. Russian informants are real.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 12:52 PM
Jul 2017

Most of them moved over to JPR. I feel bad for the innocent genuines that got mixed up in that.

I agree with your opinion, as it is the same as my own.

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
53. JPR? I've seen DUers refer to "JPR" but . . .
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 01:27 PM
Jul 2017

. . . I was never curious enough to look into that place---wherever or whatever it is. Besides: At my advanced age and poor eyesight, I'm trying to spend less time staring into the screen glare of this contraption in order to read any more bullshit than necessary . . . if you know what I mean.



beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
61. They're actually still at it.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 05:30 PM
Jul 2017

Not here but you can find Republican trolls on Twitter and Facebook who still refer to Bernie as a communist, bring up his time in a kibbutz and claim he's a Russian agent. The dog whistles about his loyalty to the United States are still being blown frequently in other places.

And I completely agree with your last sentence. Imo Bernie made Hillary a better candidate and they worked well together after the primaries were over.

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
67. Sad to say . . . but . . . some old Democrat "friends" on Facebook . . .
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 07:27 AM
Jul 2017

. . . never stopped blowing those same dog whistles since the primary season!




Maven

(10,533 posts)
59. Bernie isn't blameless either.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:58 PM
Jul 2017

He bears some of the responsibility for how this went down. I know you don't like to acknowledge that, but it's the truth. If we're saying that Hillary made mistakes, let's also admit that her opposition made mistakes too.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
60. Well I didn't say he didn't do anything
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 05:06 PM
Jul 2017

After all, he was competing.

Outside of competing, what did he do? I'm open to it.

Maven

(10,533 posts)
65. I can't get into it, because that would be refighting the primaries
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:06 PM
Jul 2017

But suffice it to say that if you frame everything he did as "competing", then you could use that to justify pretty much anything. There's a bigger picture than that, and he lost track of it. That's about as far as I'll go.

DFW

(54,277 posts)
26. She won the election. She lost the counting.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:41 AM
Jul 2017

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
36. I agree that she was a great candidate. The post-election analysis is nonsense.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:24 AM
Jul 2017

But let's not forget the damage that the partisan FBI caused. Comey had no right to send that ridiculous letter to Jason Chaffetz.

bora13

(860 posts)
39. a lesson in crime
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:30 AM
Jul 2017

when you hear someone (erroneously) accuse
another of one devious scheme after another,
the accusers should be looked at in-depth as well.

onecaliberal

(32,777 posts)
52. Clinton won by more than 3 million votes.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 01:06 PM
Jul 2017

She SHOULD be sitting in the oval right now, not that orange piece of maggot shit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's official. Hillary Cl...