Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dajoki

(10,685 posts)
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 06:00 PM Dec 2011

Sen. Bernie Sanders: Corporations Are Not People and They Shouldn't Be Allowed to Buy Our Elections

AlterNet / BySen. Bernie Sanders
Sen. Bernie Sanders: Corporations Are Not People and They Shouldn't Be Allowed to Buy Our Elections
Bottom line: Corporations should not be able to go into their treasuries and spend millions and millions of dollars on a campaign in order to buy elections.
December 9, 2011 |
http://www.alternet.org/news/153391/sen._bernie_sanders%3A_corporations_are_not_people_and_they_shouldn%27t_be_allowed_to_buy_our_elections

The Constitution of this country has served us well, but when the Supreme Court says that attempts by the federal government and states to impose reasonable restrictions on campaign ads are unconstitutional, our democracy is in grave danger. That is why I have introduced a resolution in the Senate calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

I did not do this lightly. In fact, I had never done it before. The U.S. constitution is an extraordinary document. In my view, it should not be amended often. In light of the Supreme Court's infamous 5-to-4 decision in the Citizens United case, however, I saw no alternative.

I strongly disagree with the ruling. In my view, a corporation is not a person. A corporation does not have First Amendment rights to spend as much money as it wants, without disclosure, on a political campaign.

Corporations should not be able to go into their treasuries and spend millions and millions of dollars on a campaign in order to buy elections.

The ruling has radically changed the nature of our democracy. It has further tilted the balance of the power toward the rich and the powerful at a time when the wealthiest people in this country already never had it so good. History will record that the Citizens United decision is one of the worst in the history of our country.

At a time when corporations have more than $2 trillion in cash in their bank accounts and are making record-breaking profits, the American people should be concerned when the Supreme Court says that these corporations have a constitutionally-protected right to spend shareholders' money to dominate an election as if they were real, live persons. If we do not reverse this decision, there will be no end to the impact that corporate interests can have on our campaigns and our democracy.

<<snip>>

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Bernie Sanders: Corporations Are Not People and They Shouldn't Be Allowed to Buy Our Elections (Original Post) dajoki Dec 2011 OP
I'm not worried about them buying elections... Bogart Dec 2011 #1
Once they buy the elections... dajoki Dec 2011 #5
Thanks, Bernie..One of the very few I trust. russspeakeasy Dec 2011 #2
No, only very rich individuals should be allowed to buy our elections.... Scuba Dec 2011 #3
They have already bought all the pols, they are in the process now of buying up everything! -eom Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #4
.. mdmc Feb 2012 #6
K&R....n/t unkachuck Feb 2012 #7
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
3. No, only very rich individuals should be allowed to buy our elections....
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 06:58 PM
Dec 2011

... or at least that's what I infer he wants from Bernie's proposal. It doesn't get the money out of elections.

Bernie's proposal calls on Congress to address the rich individuals. Yeah, that'll work.


It also doesn't get the electronic systems out of our elections.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen. Bernie Sanders: Corp...