If Trump live streamed himself eating puppies and babies would Congress impeach?

[Voltaire2]

I think the answer is no. What do you think?

[SummerSnow]

1. No...

They would say that the babies were here illegally and the puppies were stray, therefore justifying it.

[Voltaire2]

4. but puppies are so damn cute!

[denverbill]

2. Babies, no. Fetuses, yes.

[CanonRay]

13. Beat me to it

[iamateacher]

3. No

Sad.

[SethH]

5. they would say it's "not helpful" n/t

[pnwmom]

6. Yes, if he ate puppies and babies. n/t

[samnsara]

7. he absolutely will have to do something publically that is so

outrageous a mental health professional will have to be called. Then they will say he's sleep deprived or has the flu and quietly whisk him away to a nut house.

[emulatorloo]

8. Steve King (IA-R) would say it is patriotic to eat "anchor babies"

As to the puppies it was a "mercy killing" as there was no room at the animal shelter.

[jberryhill]

9. These aren't puppies

Anybody would eat these puppies.

Eating puppies is not illegal.

[uponit7771]

12. +1

[The Genealogist]

10. I've said previously that he could get on national TV and hand the nuclear codes to Putin

and the Republicans would laud it as a major international relations triumph. He is what they strive to be.

[Cosmocat]

14. Yep

The stupid is THAT thick over there, and we are just going along for the ride.

[uponit7771]

11. Nope, Nixon was 24% and dems still had to push to get impeachment.

[madinmaryland]

15. No. They would be pissed that tRump was bogarting the puppies and babies.

[jeffreyi]

16. Depends.

What ethnicity are the babies?

[Golden Raisin]

17. No. It's going to have to be a complete, outrageous

psychotic break/nervous breakdown on live TV. Screaming, foaming at the mouth, the works. It will then take citizen power as opposed to Congress who probably still wouldn't impeach.

[ProudLib72]

18. Nope. They'd call it a tribute to Ozzy