Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 10:57 AM Jul 2017

From the NYT- Parliamentarian nixes key Provisions of Trumpcare/now need 60 for repeal and replace.

I know a subscription may be needed by some...so here are the most important points:

"One provision questioned by the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, and cherished by conservatives would cut off federal funds for Planned Parenthood for one year. Another would prohibit use of federal subsidies to buy insurance that includes coverage for abortions. A third provision would penalize people who go without health insurance by requiring them to wait six months before their coverage could begin."

"...If formally challenged, the provisions could survive only with 60 votes, a near-impossibility in the partisan, narrowly divided Senate. The abortion-related provisions are important to many conservatives, not just in the Senate but also in the House..."
"...And Democrats made clear they would seize on the findings. “The parliamentarian’s decision today proves once again that the process Republicans have undertaken to repeal the Affordable Care Act and throw 22 million Americans off of health insurance is a disaster,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont..."






https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/21/us/politics/senate-parliamentarian-health-bill.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From the NYT- Parliamentarian nixes key Provisions of Trumpcare/now need 60 for repeal and replace. (Original Post) Demsrule86 Jul 2017 OP
McConnell: "Elizabeth, sit down" dalton99a Jul 2017 #1
This is very good news for the good guys (us). Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #4
Another email, phone call and letter to my mountain grammy Jul 2017 #2
I hate his smile too. beveeheart Jul 2017 #3
It would be so great if he lost POS. Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #5
I called Portman yesterday and will again. Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #6

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
4. This is very good news for the good guys (us).
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 11:21 AM
Jul 2017

This means they can't vote on repeal and replace without 60.

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
2. Another email, phone call and letter to my
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 11:05 AM
Jul 2017

so called senator, fucking Cory Gardner, with that stinking infernal smile.

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
5. It would be so great if he lost POS.
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 11:22 AM
Jul 2017

This means repeal and replace is dead. I can't help but believe they don't have enough votes for straight repeal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion» From the NYT- Parliament...