General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA despot in disguise: one mans mission to rip up democracy
Its the missing chapter: a key to understanding the politics of the past half century. To read Nancy MacLeans new book, Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Rights Stealth Plan for America, is to see what was previously invisible.
The history professors work on the subject began by accident. In 2013 she stumbled across a deserted clapboard house on the campus of George Mason University in Virginia. It was stuffed with the unsorted archives of a man who had died that year whose name is probably unfamiliar to you: James McGill Buchanan.
She says the first thing she picked up was a stack of confidential letters concerning millions of dollars transferred to the university by the billionaire Charles Koch.
Her discoveries in that house of horrors reveal how Buchanan, in collaboration with business tycoons and the institutes they founded, developed a hidden programme for suppressing democracy on behalf of the very rich. The programme is now reshaping politics, and not just in the US.
Buchanan was strongly influenced by both the neoliberalism of Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises, and the property supremacism of John C. Calhoun, who argued in the first half of the 19th century that freedom consists of the absolute right to use your property (including your slaves) however you may wish.
James M. Buchanan brought these influences together to create what he called public choice theory.
Any clash between freedom (allowing the rich to do as they wish) and democracy should be resolved in favour of freedom. In his book The Limits of Liberty, he noted that despotism may be the only organisational alternative to the political structure that we observe.
His prescription was a constitutional revolution: creating irrevocable restraints to limit democratic choice. Sponsored throughout his working life by wealthy foundations, billionaires and corporations, he developed a theoretical account of what this constitutional revolution would look like, and a strategy for implementing it.
At: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/19/despot-disguise-democracy-james-mcgill-buchanan-totalitarian-capitalism?CMP=share_btn_fb
James McGill Buchanan: his tireless advocacy for plutocracy earned him a Nobel Prize - and the admiration of egomaniacs everywhere.
tblue37
(66,013 posts)hedda_foil
(16,464 posts)
But his power really began to be felt when Koch, currently the seventh richest man in the US, decided that Buchanan held the key to the transformation he sought. Koch saw even such ideologues as Milton Friedman and Alan Greenspan as sellouts, as they sought to improve the efficiency of government rather than destroy it altogether. But Buchanan took it all the way.
MacLean says that Charles Koch poured millions into Buchanans work at George Mason University, whose law and economics departments look as much like corporate-funded thinktanks as they do academic faculties. He employed the economist to select the revolutionary cadre that would implement his programme (Murray Rothbard, at the Cato Institute that Koch founded, had urged the billionaire to study Lenins techniques and apply them to the libertarian cause). Between them, they began to develop a programme for changing the rules.
The papers Nancy MacLean discovered show that Buchanan saw stealth as crucial. He told his collaborators that conspiratorial secrecy is at all times essential. Instead of revealing their ultimate destination, they would proceed by incremental steps. For example, in seeking to destroy the social security system, they would claim to be saving it, arguing that it would fail without a series of radical reforms. (The same argument is used by those attacking the NHS). Gradually they would build a counter-intelligentsia, allied to a vast network of political power that would become the new establishment.
Through the network of thinktanks that Koch and other billionaires have sponsored, through their transformation of the Republican party, and the hundreds of millions they have poured into state congressional and judicial races, through the mass colonisation of Trumps administration by members of this network and lethally effective campaigns against everything from public health to action on climate change, it would be fair to say that Buchanans vision is maturing in the US.
SergeStorms
(19,259 posts)of what's to come, and may well be here already, in America. Choosing Trump to lead this exercise in the "new establishment" may have been a mistake though.
Stealth is not one of Trump's strong suits. He's a bull in a china shop, a scorched earth authoritarian who has tipped his hand on their plans. If "stealth" is their chosen delivery system for this "constitutional revolution" Trump has blown that right out of the water.
Confirmation of what so many of us have sensed all along.
moondust
(20,298 posts)For this sociopathic, despotic, subhuman garbage?
Oh wait, in 1986. That explains a lot. Roughly the middle of Ronnie and Maggie's great transformation of the world economy from a more-or-less meritocracy that served the majority to this nut's predatory despotism that serves only a handful of some of the worst assholes ever to inhabit the Earth.
Duppers
(28,196 posts)Moondust, you said it well.
The committee that chose this subhuman must have been terribly naive or sociopathic idiots themselves.
I googled but could not find the names of this committee. Did find this: Nomination and Selection of Laureates in Economic Sciences
https://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/economic-sciences/
And this on Buchanan's award:
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1986/press.html
dalton99a
(83,262 posts)Buchanan was one of the many RW economists that he glorified
Duppers
(28,196 posts)malaise
(275,233 posts)Excellent read
oasis
(51,282 posts)BadgerMom
(2,915 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(50,283 posts)dchill
(39,680 posts)oxbow
(2,034 posts)They should be ashamed. I don't even know what to do to fight this cancer in my alma mater...
Duppers
(28,196 posts)don't send them money.
Btw, bet your degree is not from that department.
I wrote a letter, on behalf of my son, a graduate, to UVA to protest a couple of their facility members, one who denied GCC and another who was in the Bush Jr. Administration. Told them I would never again send any donations as long as those people remained employed by the university.
oxbow
(2,034 posts)To me, this is worse than what happened at penn state. Both looked like nice places but their looks were deceiving. Both had secrets they were hiding, ones that were causing a lot of people to be harmed. GMU is hurting many more people but will likely get away with it from a legal standpoint
Duppers
(28,196 posts)In economics. He now, not surprisingly, works for the Heritage Foundation!
This info now clarifies how sick the Econ Dept. at GMU truly is and why it's a gateway to the Heritage Foundation.
As an aside, this young man grew up with a nutcase mother and in the Christadelphian Church (an apocalyptic belief). Indoctrination must run deep there.
dalton99a
(83,262 posts)Sep 1, 2011
5. Patrick Henry College: After a documentary exposed the surprising number of students at Patrick Henry College with high level internships in the Bush administration, the school has gained scrutiny for its extensive ties to the Republican Party and social conservative groups.
4. Hillsdale College: The school was in the news recently when it was revealed that Justice Clarence Thomas failed to disclose the Hillsdale salary of his wife Ginni Thomas. Called the citadel of American conservatism, Hillsdale features academics like Rush Limbaugh fill-in Mark Steyn, and is said to be a pipeline to Republican jobs on Capitol Hill.
3. George Mason University: George Mason University has served as a libertarian enclave with close ties to K Street lobbyists since the 1980s, when Charles Koch began donating heavily to the school. Koch Industries executive vice president for public policy, Rich Fink, heads two Koch programs at the school. Matt Kibbe and other leading libertarian activists are alumni of George Masons free market economics department.
2. Kings College: In 1997, the Campus Crusade for Christ International purchased Kings College, a New Jersey-based school that had been shuttered since 1944, and reestablished it on two floors of the Empire State Building in New York City. Led by Dinesh DSouza, author of a book this year arguing that President Obamas Kenyan heritage gives him a third world anti-colonial mindset, the school has gained a reputation for training dogmatically conservative Christian activists.
1. Liberty University: Founded by the late televangelist preacher Jerry Falwell in 1971, Liberty has prided itself as one of the most influential Christian colleges in the nation. Despite the fact Liberty receives about $445 million in yearly taxpayer subsidies, the school prohibits openly gay students and College Democrats. While the school has received much scorn for its teaching of youth earth creationism, it boasts a world class debating team coached by a former Bush adviser.
Duppers
(28,196 posts)mrs_p
(3,049 posts)And Citizens United is part of it too. A country where money rules supreme. We already see how our votes don't count. Only our dollars.
This makes me sick.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)...do note that this degenerate philosophy has led to the illegitimate installation of Comrade Casino, the republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief.
dalton99a
(83,262 posts)This article explains so much
no_hypocrisy
(48,041 posts)It's not paranoia if it's Truth.