General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe should not be pro abortion!
We should be pro education, pro contriception, and pro choice.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)Warpy
(111,239 posts)Yes, it can save your life if you need it, but nobody really wants to go through it.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)SJMULE
(193 posts)Women and girls are having abortions all the time because they need to go on vacation, go out on a date or out drinking, to fit in their bikini,or they dont want to sell their two seat sports car.....
still_one
(92,122 posts)about
MaryLouisaWillis
(44 posts)that seems rather obvious.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)That's ridiculous.
I trust that a woman who thinks abortion is her best option is making a valid decision, maybe even a good decision if she decides to have an abortion. I support that without condition because I am pro-whatever decision she wants to make about her bodily investment in pregnency.
PJMcK
(22,028 posts)Yet I interpret your view as "pro-choice" since you're trusting the pregnant woman to know what is best for her circumstances.
Regardless, I think we're in complete agreement concerning who has the right to make personal decisions.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I am pro apendectomies, pro-heart bypasses, pro elective surgeries that fix something that do not present a medical risk or problem. For example, cosmetic surgery, etc.
I think some elective cosmetic surgeries ultimately enable the social rejection of people who do not reach an ideal standard of appearance, and I have a personal problem with perpetuating those ideals. Thus, I find the beauty culture pressure that people (most often women) are confronted with offensive.
I would love to see a shift in a direction that would not encourage that pressure. But, I also see it as a valid personal choice that may offer comfort.
Given my personal opposition to the messages sent by widespread use of surgical procedures to "improve" appearance, some might interpret my position as anti-cosmetic surgery. I have known people who passionately view those decisions with judgement, and I don't think that is fair. To not be generally pro-elective cosmetic surgery is to enable a rigid point of view that supports social pressures in the alternate direction.
In some instances it is necessary to take a side.
I admit to the validity of any position but I consider my pro abortion and pro-cosmetic surgery because I believe those options are valid and, in that sense, as good and equally moral as the alternative.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)That is to say that you would not be supportive of any procedure not consented to by a competent adult.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I support the existence of the procedure. In the case of abortion, I am adamently supportive because there are forces that want to see the elimination of the procedure itself.
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)some other such thing.
I trust that a woman is capable of choosing her medical procedures with the advice of her physician and anyone else she deems worthy of weighing in on her decision.
The procedure itself is a whole other thing, and it's weird to be pro or anti a medical procedure in a general sense.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Pro abortion.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)Why would the existence of a medical procedure that's been around since the beginning of history require anyone to be in favor of it?
This whole "pro-abortion" thing is an emotional manipulation by anti-choice zealots (many of whom are pro-choosing to have an abortion when it's their own pregnancy or someone that they love).
Are you in favor of the existence of other kind of horrific but medically necessary/recommended procedures? Amputation? Mastectomy? etc.
I'm just frustrated any time we give even so much as a nanometer to the hateful idiots who make it their life's work to harass, terrorize and abuse women and doctors seeking to make medical decisions about what's in the best interest of their own (or their patient's) bodies.
Conceding this preposterous position that we need to be in favor of established medical procedures or against it, is just irritating.
I totally agree with you, I'm very much in favor of women choosing what's best for them. I'm in favor of pregnancy by choice, delivery by choice, and motherhood by choice, and the existence of all those things.
I'm also not pro-abortion, since that's a case when something has gone wrong. Either maldevelopment of a wanted pregnancy, or a pregnancy happened when it was not desired and now a woman/girl has to go through the onerous task of seeking out and getting a procedure that so many make into something more than the regular medical care it is.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Always with the wider understanding that it is FOR people who CHOOSE it on informed consent based on their circumstances.
But yes, I'm pro-abortion because they are chipping away at it, every fucking day.
this happened 5h ago.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-rejects-abortion-law-putting-minors-through-trial-like-hearing/ar-AApfz9E
Look at what they are doing. LOOK. Look at the absolute shit they want to put people through.
Hell yes I'm pro-abortion.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What the hell does that even mean?
Of course I'm pro-mastectomy and pro-amputation.
Well said.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)People use it because they are trying to distance themselves from what abortion necessarily entails.
MountCleaners
(1,148 posts)I never liked the term - it smacks of puritanism and pearl-clutching. I am female and I say that I support abortion rights.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)Women have the right to choose whether, and when, to bear children.
A pregnant woman has at least two options to choose from; abortion is only one of them.The minute I become pro-abortion, rather than choice, I am puting my finger on a scale it has no business being on. That makes me no better than the "pro-life" advocates who put their finger on the other side of the scale.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)That's fascinating, given that kind of association is almost never applied to other advocacy groups. In almost every conceivable case, being "pro-" anything necessarily implies choice. It is assumed that if pot is legalized, those who do not want to smoke pot will choose not to. Pro-feminists assume those who do not wish to identify as feminists will choose not to. It is assumed that if pornography remains available for public consumption, those who want nothing to do with it will choose not to buy it.
And to be perfectly honest, choice isn't the issue. The anti-abortionists aren't looking to rob people of choice generally, but to take away a particular choice they believe is immoral. The choice argument is therefore peripheral, and doesn't address their primary criticisms. Arguing that abortion is perfectly moral and should be normalized, however, addresses the anti-abortionists head-on.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)Who knew?
But seriously, that is the context for this discussion.
And choice is very much the issue, because those on the other side want to remove the right to choose if and when to bear children.
Frankly, many of the people who identify themselves as pro-abortion, including people on DU, really do advocate against choice, when the choice made differs with theirs (especially when it involves having more than a few children or giving birth and then giving the child up for adoption, as two specific examples that come up frequently.
Pro means advocating for whatever follows. I am advocating for women to be able to make the best choice for themselves. I am not advocating for them to choose either life, or abortion. That is why pro-choice is the appropriate term - it is none of my business which choice they make. It is my business to help ensure they have the right to choose.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)The available choices are absurdly limited -- have children or abstain from sex -- but say they are "anti-choice" and that is exactly how they would respond.
Their position is that abortion is immoral, that it is a deplorable act, that it is murder. The choice argument patently fails to address that. Through omission it concedes the morality issue to the right. That may leave abortion legal, but it also leaves the doors wide open for shaming women who have gotten abortions or who are considering getting the procedure.
I don't find anecdotes particularly compelling. If I looked hard enough, I'm sure I could find a couple of secular anti-abortionists. That doesn't mean secular anti-abortionists are anything to be concerned about.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)The only acceptable choice is life - and they are very clear about that. It is part of the title they choose for themselves, and their entire focus.
I'm just reporting what I have experienced in conversations on DU wiht people that runs counter to your assertion pro-abortion really implies advocating for choice. You can choose to ignore it, or not. I am explaining why I find it offensive to be told that anything short of pro-abortion is "a lukewarm-bordering-cowardly term," or that I am using it "because {I am} trying to distance {myself} from what abortion necessarily entails."
You are free to call yourself whatever you want. But it is offensive for you to cast aspersions on me for making a different choice. That was my point. Many of us who call ourselves pro-choice are making an affirmative statement about empowering all women to make whatever choices are appropriate for themselves, even if is is a choice with which we don't agree.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)That is a crock of shit. Very, very few who identify as pro-abortion advocate against choice. It is true that many criticize other people's choices that they consider foolish. That is NOT advocating against choice and it is extremely dishonest to claim that it is. Criticizing a particular choice is not the same as denying someone the right to make that choice.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)When people who self-identify as pro-abortion consistently criticize choices other than abortion (as some I have encountered here - and elsewhere - do), that is not supporting choice. If there is only one acceptable choice (terminating pregnancy), being pro-abortion does not imply empowering women to make whatever choice is appropriate for their particular circumstances. It is not your business to judge whether you find their choice is foolish or not - and I have encountered too many people who identify as pro-abortion who simultaneously cruticize women who choose to continue a pregnancy - but not those who choose to terminate it - to believe there is an accidental correlation.
I am not saying that people who are pro-abortion use the same tactics as people who are pro-life, or pose anywhere near the threat the pro-life people do. I am not saying you have to call
yourself pro-life. I am explaining why pro-abortion, in my experience, is NOT the same as advocating that all women be empowered and able to make whatever choice is right for them. I.e. it is NOT pro-choice. It is far too frequently pro-choice-as-long-as-you-choose-the-path-I-deem-not-foolish.
I am pro-choice, and not because (as the post I responded to alleged) I am "lukewarm-bordering-cowardly" and "trying to distance {myself} from what abortion necessarily entails." You are perfectly free to call yourself pro-abortion, but don't cast aspersions on others who call themselves pro-choice because we really are deeply committed to empowering women to make whatever the appropriate choice is for them.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)'Pro Abortion' means keeping it legal and available, and for many of us, working to eliminate the bullshit social stigma that comes with it (which you can even hear in this thread with people mewling over 'a hard decision', when for many it is not, and it need not be for anyone.)
'Pro Life' or anti-abortion seeks to remove a choice from others.
It would be 'equal' if the 'pro abortion' position was to pressure people into having an abortion, or mandating it under XYZ circumstances. Something we don't do.
Making sure something is available as a choice, is not the 180 degree opposite thing as removing it as a choice. Mandating it would be 180 degrees opposite from banning it, but nobody is advocating to mandate it.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)Including on DU, who are actively advocating for taking choice away, and/or shaming women who choose to have several children- or to bear a child and give it up for adoption.
The tactics of at least significant portion of people who identify themselves as pro-abortion may not be as extreme as those who identify as pro-abortion - but their position is every bit as much advocating for a specific choice (abortion) rather than for every woman to be able to make the choice that is right for her.
It is none of my business if a woman who has 5 children wants a 6th. It is her right to make that choice. Just as it was my mother's right to choose to seek an abortion for what would have been her 6th child (4 by adoption). There are DU pro-abortion members who would have condemned the former for her choice just as surely as pro-life advocates would condemn my mother. Neither is appropriate - it is none of our business. Our business is ensuring the right of all women to make either choice. Hence pro-choice. It is not a word chosen not to offend; it is literally what I mean.
Voltaire2
(12,996 posts)Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)using to club us with is not helpful.
It cedes ground to them.
They're not chipping away at abortion, they're chipping away at autonomy, basic human rights, a woman's ownership of her own body, a doctor's duty and ability to treat her patient.
All because they're pointing to the procedure itself and what it looks like. Take some gory pictures of knee surgery (or pregnancy for that matter) and people will be grossed out.
I'm tired of how they get to ignore what they're actually doing because we get distracted by having to defend the "icky sounding procedure".
I'm looking at what they're doing, and I understand the actual shit they want to put people through, and I'm saying don't concede ANY ground to them.
Don't let them make it about the procedure, that's what they want. What they're doing is more vile than that it, it's the the concession that women are not worthy of the basic human rights that we don't violate on the worst criminal, AFTER they've been executed, even that cadaver has more rights than these terrorists are grant a living woman.
It's not about the mastectomy or the D&C, it's about the fact that women are not considered human beings. Don't let them have a nanometer on THAT front, it doesn't even go into what the procedure is, it should stop at the question of autonomy that they keep insisting that girls and women do not have the basic right to.
So hell yes, be Pro-Autonomy, pro-choice, pro-bodily integrity, pro-human rights don't even get to the point where you need to specify which procedures we need to be thankful for! That's too much concession.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)If someone is pro legal abortion they are pro abortion, unless they think it is reasonable to have an opinion on whether that is the choice someone makes.
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)them is unacceptable.
They want to make contraception illegal as well. Why do we need to concede all these things?
Being pro-choice is not being "pro-abortion". That's the terminology they use to demonize us, and attack us. Do we really care that much WHAT procedure or medication they wish to decide to make illegal, or are we about destroying the basis of their argument: that women are not human beings worthy of basic human rights?
I'm saying do not give them the ground at all. I don't care what these terrorists want to be illegal, since that's a huge list, from comprehensive sex education, to effective contraception to affordable care.
These are not reasonable people, reject the basis of their argument, that they have the right to violate the basic human rights of women for whatever reason or fairy tale they concoct.
It isn't about a D&C or an abortifacient, or contraceptive, or whatever it is they wish to attack on, it's about reject as a whole that it's even up for debate that a woman has basic rights to her bodily integrity, to autonomy or to access to medical care, no matter what that specific care is.
I'm tired of them spelling out all the positions and the terminology, when while pretending they're not anti-life, anti-choice, and not terribly pro-fetus, pro-pregnancy or even anti-abortion, since their policies do not in anyway reduce abortion.
The way we do that is to make every pregnancy a WANTED one, and to address all the reasons that make abortion a painful decision for women (the health reasons, the job reasons, the financial reasons etc. etc. etc.)
It should be no more anyone's business than any other medical procedure, be it elective or emergent.
Atman
(31,464 posts)That is pro-choice. That is being an informed adult who understands the incredible decision a woman faces when placed in this situation. But to say you're "pro abortion" isn't right. I'm not "pro liver transplant," I don't go around telling people they should replace their vital organs. But I understand that sometimes people are faced with difficult choices and difficult medical and personal situations, and I believe they should be able to make those decisions without interference from bible-thumping government officials. That's much different than being "pro abortion."
In contrast, I'm pro-food, pro-education, pro-science...
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Not only do I support the choice, I am also fan of the procedure itself as an available option. Pro-abortion.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)It means I am not only in favor of a right to make the choice. I am in favor of the possibility to make the choice, which is only possible if I am in favor of the procedure itself.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)It's more accurate to say that you are pro-choice.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Any more than me being opposed to arranged marriages makes me "anti-marriage."
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)way.
Consider a scenario where waiting periods and counseling, and bans on divorce after X period of time, were codified in state law by conservatives.
You might take a 'pro-divorce' activist stance after all, rather than being 'pro-choice on marriage'.
There's a lot more to family planning than simply abortion, and to say 'I'm Pro-Choice' doesn't explicitly underline what I am willing to support. I might be just pro comprehensive sex-ed, or pro contraceptives, etc.
I happily identify as Pro Abortion because I am specifically standing up in support of this specific procedure to ensure it is legal and accessible. There are many aspects of family planning that are under attack, but Abortion bears the brunt of their concentrated efforts.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I would be opposed to obstacles to someone choosing what they, as a competent adult, would choose.
That would cover it all.
(However, I will point out the difference in the comparison to waiting periods in a medical procedure that is time restricted to waiting periods in another situation. Many who are anti-choice will gloss over the the very real onerous conditions that waiting periods on abortion create in the ability of a woman to get a timely abortion. Waiting periods for gun purchases do not create those medical hazards, and would indeed create a "cooling off period" in instances of a rage purchase, with no negative consequences for the purchaser.)
Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #105)
ehrnst This message was self-deleted by its author.
Voltaire2
(12,996 posts)I'm pro divorce too. I'm enthusiastically in favor of allowing people to terminate marriage contracts as easily as the enter into them, without any stigma.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Opposing medical coercion does not mean I am not PRO (as in- in favor of) the medical procedure of abortion as an available option.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)You are anti-abortion when it is COERCED, or required of a woman.
You certainly aren't pro-coerced or required abortion, are you?
This addresses the circumstances surrounding abortion, which are indeed an issue.
I am pro-marriage, but not when it is arranged. The term "pro" does have qualifiers.
That is why the term "pro-choice" was determined to be more accurate when describing the political position concerning abortion (or any medical procedure, really. No one is pro-unneccesary or uninformed medical procedures.)
Is that clearer?
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I am not pro-forcing a person to have a medical procedure. But I am certainly pro - an opportunity to have surgical procedures. An opportunity to make a choice is not the equivilant of an imposition of a choice.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)is not a positive situation. Consent withheld converts lovemaking to rape, for instance. The removal of consent from marriage converts it to an abuse. Being against rape does not make one anti-sex, and vice verca. Consent is the only constant that one should advocate in any of those. And that's what I think you actually advocate.
A procedure does not exist until it is performed - it is a concept prior to being performed, and consent is an integral part of performing a procedure.
Is that clearer?
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)That is exactly what I have been saying. I am in favor of the availability of the medical procedure known as abortion, just as I am in favor of the fact that sex is a part of human behavioral repetiore. I oppose the act of coercing abortion or any other surgical procedure just as I oppose coercive sex.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)That would confuse an anti-choicer, because they don't see it from a consent point of view.
They see pro-abortion as anti-adoption, or anti-birth, because choice isn't part of their concept, and the terminology doesn't address consent.
Pro-choice addresses all of them in one term.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)I'm a fan of safe, proven, routine healthcare procedures that make people's lives better. Abortion fits the bill.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)metalbot
(1,058 posts)Mostly anti-population extremists who essentially argue that people should have more abortions.
Just a handful in my entire life though...
Hekate
(90,637 posts)wryter2000
(46,032 posts)Period
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)When it comes to looking for a tactic that ends an unwanted pregnancy, I'm pro-abortion.
CrispyQ
(36,453 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)tonedevil
(3,022 posts)makes any action unacceptable. I'm anti-apple pie if it is coerced or forced. Do you have a real point?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,365 posts)but the point is really moot.
It's none of my business what someone else does with their own body.
mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)David__77
(23,369 posts)I'm glad that this procedure exists.
wryter2000
(46,032 posts)Speaking as someone who had one before Roe, I have a very personal stake in it. To me, saying I'm pro abortion means I'm in favor of dictating it to other people the same way "pro life" tells women what they can do with their bodies.
Besides, saying I'm pro abortion plays into the hands of the "pro life" crowd.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Let's not pretend they are 'pro life' either.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I was pro-birth when I had my son, and I won't put myself in the same category as the pro-forced childbearing crowd.
They are anti-choice. I am pro-choice when it comes to birth and not giving birth.
There were people who asked how I could be "pro-abortion" and still be thrilled seeing my sonograms.
I said, "It's because I consented to childbearing. If you look at it from the point of view of choice, that makes perfect sense."
Pachamama
(16,886 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Being pro-abortion is no different than being pro-root canal or pro-appendectomy. You're not saying you want to force others to have root canals and appendectomies, just that you support the procedure.
Renew Deal
(81,854 posts)And it was a wise one to make
jmg257
(11,996 posts)brucefan
(1,549 posts)"Pro abortion"
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Or is that too much to ask for?
No woman out there should be forced to give birth to a child she does not want btw!
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)And pro privacy and pro bodily autonomy because a government that can prevent your abortion can also make you have one. They have no fucking business in anyone's reproductive choices ever
Pachamama
(16,886 posts)That includes a woman's and mans rights to access to birth control, healthcare, pre and post natal care, and yes, termination of a pregnancy "abortion" if that is
I am opposed to anybody that tells me or any other man or woman what they can do in their reproductive choices and their body.
irisblue
(32,963 posts)I am with 3 of your 4 points. I'd like to hear your reasoning. Thanks in advance.
stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Abortion is a medical procedure, between the woman and her physician.
Abortion is an important medical procedure, I am pro abortion the way I am pro tonsillectomy.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)6000eliot
(5,643 posts)irisblue
(32,963 posts)6000eliot
(5,643 posts)irisblue
(32,963 posts)autocorrect catches me too many times.
unblock
(52,190 posts)OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)Being pro-healthcare-tactic for people who need healthcare is generally a good position to be in.
Oneironaut
(5,491 posts)fetuses are aborted. However, the option to have an abortion is a good thing. It's always a difficult situation.
I agree with your message content.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)It's not always a "difficult situation" and promoting a narrative that it should be doesn't help women.
blackdove78
(35 posts)My abortion wasn't the slightest bit difficult.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Before I even knew for certain I was pregnant I had already made the decision to abort. No soul searching, no second guessing, no twinges of conscience. When the test came back positive I couldn't make the appointment fast enough. When it was over all I felt was relief.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Caliman73
(11,728 posts)When you say things like "We should not be pro abortion" you play into the hands of anti-choice people. They have tried to infuse their own interpretation of religion into a personal medical decision. Should we not be saying that we are "Not pro appendectomy!" too? We are pro choice and if that choice happens to be abortion, then we are pro abortion. Yielding on words, just gives opponents of women's rights that much more power.
lark
(23,091 posts)I understand your point is that with education and contraception abortion shouldn't be that common. However, shit happens. Things happen, like - the birth control pill failed, fetus turns out to not be viable, mom gets condition where she can't carry the baby to term and it's not viable, younger woman couldn't get birth control because parents wouldn't allow it and condom breaks, woman who wasn't sexually active gets drunk and has sex, whether consensual or not. If a woman needs an abortion, she should have the right to have one, and we should support her decision,period the end.
Intransigent Atheist
(18 posts)I would think that for anyone to be pro abortion, they would have to be a misanthrope the likes of which most of us would never see, thankfully.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)Response to Soxfan58 (Original post)
David__77 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)Those on the left should not commit political idolatry of abortion dogma like some on the right idolize the firearm and 2nd Amendment dogma.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)I would say more, but...
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,318 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)I shouldn't spend my Saturdays standing outside the clinic, accosting random women and forcing them to go inside?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,403 posts)I have NEVER heard anybody refer to themselves as such.
hlthe2b
(102,216 posts)PRO-ABORTION.
This just incenses me! So damned tired of RW memes and stereotypes being pushed here.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hlthe2b
(102,216 posts)Your apology is noted, however.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)talking about the availability of condoms when this fight is happening:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/abortion-womens-health-outcomes-maternal-mortality/
New Study Shows that States With the Most Anti-Abortion Laws Also Have the Worst Womens Health
These policies only work to further place women at a disadvantage.
THAT is why I'm pro abortion. Because it needs to be defended as a safe and legal option, or it will disappear.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)If you need one get one. They're legal and they're important.
I'm pro abortion for myself, pro choice for everybody else. Two of my kids wouldn't exist without abortion.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)If I get pregnant I'm having an abortion. No debate, no apology, I'm not interested in risking my health.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)I'm pro abortion in the same way I'm pro birth control, pro MRI, pro aspirin, pro yoga, etc. If a woman wants access to any of those things, there should be no laws standing in her way, nor should she be compelled to consider the opinions of anyone (aside from, in some examples/cases, a medical professional).
xajj4791
(84 posts)And can give you a list if you find a time machine. I have another list that should they show up I would be glad to stop their genes from perpetuating.
Other than this, what was your point OP? Besides trying to be obtuse and create arguments where none were before?
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I'm sorry if that makes you uncomfortable.
LexVegas
(6,056 posts)syringis
(5,101 posts)of what you mean by "pro abortion".
By this do you mean that abortion should no be a sort of contraception afterwards ?
get the red out
(13,461 posts)We are for choice, all choices regarding reproduction. I don't even know what pro-abortion is? For people NOT being able to choose to have a baby when they are pregnant?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)you fucking bet I identify as pro-abortion, because it needs to be actively defended if it is to remain a safe legal option for any variety of reasons a woman might choose it.
If they weren't pushing to strip it from society, to outlaw it, then I wouldn't have to be 'pro' anything, and it would just be a thing that people may choose if it fits their circumstance.
Not only that, but most pro-lifers ALSO work to instill abstinence only education, which has about the same failure rate as prayer. They work to restrict contraceptives. No plan B. Work to promulgate this ridiculous social stigma on sex outside the archetype of marriage they personally approve of and nothing else, etc. They actually work to make the need for abortion, to address expanded circumstances, more likely.
Until they back off, I'm pro-abortion.
When the war is over, I'll just be me and that's fine.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Enough of the 'abortion should be rare' talking point.
It's just another way to shame women who have abortions. They want us to be ashamed of making that choice, to feel guilty and to admit we regret it. They want to use our stories as cautionary tales as if we did something wrong.
Fuck that noise. I had an abortion and I'm glad I did, I didn't hesitate or feel a twinge of conscience. Not once.
It's a medical procedure, period. And it's no one else's business.
librechik
(30,674 posts)That is just a lie that the Right Wing Christians have turned into a talking point.
Heddi
(18,312 posts)Please see my post below yours
I am anything but a right wing christian (I'm a socialist atheist) and I"m not a talking point.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Heddi
(18,312 posts)I'm a medical professional. If a woman wants an abortion, she has every right to receive one YES RIGHT UP UNTIL THE PRECIOUS SECONDS BEFORE BIRTH because that never happens and YES EVEN IF ITS BECAUSE THE BABY IS ONE GENDER AND NOT THE OTHER because that really isn't an issue anyways.
I am pro abortion. I will always be pro-abortion. I'm also pro-education (not everyone has the same ability or desire to learn, retain knowledge, or have abstract thought), and pro-contraception (no method of birth control is 100% effective), and pro-prevention (which would do nothing to prevent pregnancy via rape or birth control failure). But more than that, I'm pro-abortion.
And I am pro-choice. You have the choice to not have an abortion if you don't want one.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)No one needs to tell anyone she needs/wants an abortion other than the healthcare provider she seeks the service from. Whomever else she might choose to involve in the matter is her choice as well.
It is no one else's business and it should NOT be a topic of discussion. It is a private and personal matter. End of story.
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)johnp3907
(3,730 posts)Unabashedly so.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)So the term "pro-choice" would likely be more accurate.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)If I was pro-coerced or pro-forced abortion I would use those terms. But I'm not.
I am proudly pro-abortion.
The definition of pro:
1. in favor of.
I am in favor of abortion so I'm pro-abortion. It's an accurate term.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Here in the PacNW there are many hospitals that simply won't offer it anymore. What then, of choice?
Sorry, not on the menu, so to speak.
11 of 12 regional hospitals here in Seattle are now operating under the ownership of, or joint operating agreement with the catholic church, and thus catholic medical ethics rules. The US wing of the RCC is buying up entire hospitals and entire billing systems, and entire insurance systems. It's an end-run on banning it.
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/faith-healers/Content?oid=16050396
It is not enough to say 'I am pro choice' when the raw availability of the option is no longer an option to choose.
They are in it to win it, and we need to be as well.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I understand why people don't want to use the term pro-abortion and why the party will never use it - but I'm not afraid to wear it proudly.
Abortion isn't a bad word and it's time to stop treating it like it's a Bad Thing. And it's long past time to stop pretending that women who have abortions did something wrong.
I support as many abortions as women need, I don't use weasel words like 'rare'. It should be paid for by insurance and easily accessible at clinics, doctors' offices and hospitals. It shouldn't be viewed any differently than any other medical procedure.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Her CHOICE is the what is important in any and all childbearing decisions and procedures.
It covers it all.
Just pro (the choice of the woman.)
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)No one says they're pro-choice when it comes to mastectomies, appendectomies or any other surgical procedure. How is abortion different?
The right spent decades shaming women for choosing to terminate their pregnancies and turning the word abortion into a lightning rod that no one wants to touch. I refuse to play their game. I reject the stigma.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)When I argue with anti-choicers, I ask them if forced childbearing is a positive thing, because that is what the alternative to choice is.
They have the mindset that childbearing is the opposite morally of abortion, because consent is not a part of the discussion - but forced childbearing is not in any way more moral than consentual abortion.
The shame should be on anyone who reduces childbearing to something forced on a woman. The absence of consent is what turns any procedure into an abomination.
That is why I call myself pro-choice, because that is what is most important in any discussion of any reproductive procedure.
I think that the Duggars have thrown morality out the window, but I will respect choice.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I just posted the definition of pro as an adverb, it means 'in favor of' something. So when we say we're pro-abortion that means were in favor of it. It doesn't mean we want to force someone to have an abortion.
I'm not pro-forced birth or pro-forced abortion, and I'm not anti-abortion, I'm pro-abortion.
I'm also pro-birth control and pro-sex education. If I said that out loud no one would think I meant that people should be forced to use birth control and learn about sex education. Abortion is no different.
I'm also pro-sex, pro-vegetarianism, pro-marijuana, and pro-whatever-adults-want-to-do as long as everyone consents. That doesn't mean I want to force others to have sex, give up meat or smoke pot.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The political term "pro-choice," as we all know, applies to abortion legislation, not to pizza toppings. It is used because "pro-abortion" isn't accurate in the political definition. "Pro-choice" doesn't promote one option over another, as pro-abortion would lead someone to believe you favor that option in a political discussion. It is a reflection of what the medical community has stated is the best practice for public health and safety, and the medical community code of ethics forbids them from favoring one medically appropriate option over another to a patient who has a choice to make. The informed patient is the one who does the favoring.
"Pro-life" in a political discussion means, as we all know, that you oppose legal access to abortion, not that you prefer a particular brand of cereal. I will never say I am "pro-life" and "pro-choice" as many pro-choice people do, because that involves mixing non political phrases with political labels, no matter what the adverb implies means in other contexts.
A writer I know said that "because I have a baby, I always have come down on the side of "life." Misusing that term erases "choice" or "consent" from the discussion as a valid concept. I told him that because I have given birth, I will always support childbirth by choice, rather than forced childbirth. I took the argument out of the "dead baby vs live baby" back and forth, by simply bringing it back to "willing" or "forced" view of childbearing - without focusing on what is "best" for her.
The opposite of "choice" is "forced" - the opposite of abortion is childbirth. When you make the discussion about the options, rather than about the choice, the true crux of the argument - the woman's will - is bypassed.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And words mean things, pro means: in favor of.
So when I and other people say we are pro-abortion we mean we are in favor of the procedure.
I don't give a pink patootie what rhetoric anti-abortion people use, I'm not going to run from the word abortion because it's been demonized.
I. Am. Pro-abortion.
It does not mean pro-forced abortion. If I wanted to say I was pro-forced abortion I would use those words.
One more time:
Pro: in favor of
Pro-abortion: in favor of abortion
I am pro-abortion.
If you don't like the term don't use it, but please don't tell me I shouldn't because you don't like it.
Thanks.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I'm just explaining why this isn't used in the political world, and why someone who is assuming that you are using the term in a political sense would think you mean something else.
No one is censoring you....
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)When questioned, I'll still politically identify as pro-abortion. Nobody's talking about the DNC party platform position statements here.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Abortion is fine. Null implications.
I am equally pro education, pro contraception, pro family planning (including IVF, AI) and pro choice, including pro abortion.
Freethinker65
(10,009 posts)politicat
(9,808 posts)I don't tell you to lay off the carbs or I'll disapprove of your cardiac bypasses. I don't get a judgement in anyone else's surgical or bodily decisions (except when that person specifically and legally outsourced the decision to me, such as the medical POAs I hold/have held.) It's not my business to doubt other people's bodily autonomy, but it is my business to vehemently oppose those who think they do have a right to determine other people's autonomy.
I don't care what your specific decisions are for your body. You get to make them, and you don't need to report them to anyone. But in having that privacy, you have the responsibility to defend that privacy for everyone else.
Hekate
(90,637 posts)demmiblue
(36,838 posts)marybourg
(12,611 posts)it has no place on DU.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)whatever a person wants as long as its not harming me or anyone else for that matter
I figure its none of my fucking business
n/t
DrDan
(20,411 posts)they should have been challenged every time they uttered those words
Bettie
(16,088 posts)Choice indicates that it is entirely the decision of each individual woman what she does with her body.
This is why I don't call the ones who call themselves "pro-life" by that name, they are anti-choice, against letting a woman make her own choices and they are only "pro" fetal life, with zero care for the lives of women.
Of course, once that fetus takes a breath outside the womb, they don't care at all what happens to it.
Now, OP, if you personally believe that abortion is wrong, then don't have one. It is not your job or my job to decide for anyone but ourselves.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Then it's 'bootstraps for you, kid, quit mooching off the gubmint'.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Which I feel is more descriptive.
I see nothing wrong with the term or being pro-abortion. Abortion is a medical procedure and just like virtually all other medical procedures (with the possible exception of executions) are voluntary.
You wanted a long thread? Attention?
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)for born children.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)their body. My body my choice. Pro-abortion is just fine to me
jmg257
(11,996 posts)You can be for it, or against it, easy enough.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)So, yeah, you can call me pro-abortion. If a woman wants an abortion, then she needs that medical procedure.
I'm also pro-birth control for men and women. Pro-sex education. Pro-education (period). Pro-living wage. Pro-affordable housing. Pro-affordable child care. Pro-income equality. Pro-equality in job hiring. Pro- equality and fairness in the justice system. Pro-harassment free work places.
For those who haven't met anyone pro-abortion...
Hi, my name is Solly Mack. Nice to meet you.
You can cross that off your bucket list now.
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)I guess I'm a man who got 'splained to!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I wish there were more like you.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)People react negatively to the word abortion because they were either taught by their religion it was wrong, or maybe their parents told them it was wrong. Or whatever.
But it's a medical procedure and I see no reason to pretend it is anything else. People bring their own baggage to the word - not the other way around. That's not the case with all words, of course.
It's a medical procedure. People need to stop turning it into anything else.
If people want to take the negativity out of the word - a negativity people put into the word to begin with - they might try thinking of it as medical science - because, well, it is.
But then some people fear the word science, so...
Yes, I know women struggle with the decision - some do, anyway. But that's their emotional journey and can't be said to be true of all women. A look at why some women are made to feel negative/bad about the medical procedure would better serve to remove the negative connotation than to pretend there is anything wrong with the medical procedure itself.
I can only speak for myself.
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)I feel the same--it's a medical procedure and we shouldn't demonize it.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)It serves no purpose other than to put more of a burden on a woman. To shame her.
Thank you!!!
Mariana
(14,854 posts)still believe that abortion is inherently A Bad Thing. You never hear anyone insist they should not be called "pro-whatever" about any other issue. Can you just imagine anyone saying, "Don't say I'm pro-same sex marriage. That implies I'm in favor of it in every circumstance. Well, I'm not in favor of forcing people to marry someone of the same sex, therefore I'm no pro-same sex marriage. I'm pro-choice about same sex marriage." No, this bullshit only happens when talking about abortion.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I too am pro-abortion, pro-birth control for men and women. Pro-sex education. Pro-education (period). Pro-living wage. Pro-affordable housing. Pro-affordable child care. Pro-income equality. Pro-equality in job hiring. Pro- equality and fairness in the justice system. Pro-harassment free work places.
Yes on everything you said.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)I simply can't pretend abortion is a reason to speak in hushed tones.
Like it's some dirty secret to ashamed of.
And the only reason it is expected to be done is to make "pro-lifers" feel better - and all it does is play into their thinking that abortion is wrong.
If there is no shame, then act like it.
If you play to "pro-lifers" (and everyone please note the quotes) then they come away thinking that you secretly think it wrong.
I've had "pro-lifers" say as much to me. That liberals don't like saying pro-abortion because they know it's wrong, so they say pro-choice instead. That we wouldn't say pro-abortion because we want to live in denial about what it really is.
And they had such smug looks on their faces when they told me that.
I set them straight in short order.
Abortion is medical procedure and the only baggage it comes with is the baggage people bring into it.
..........
No one is forcing anyone to have an abortion - that strips choice/options/autonomy from women as well. For those thinking it clever to equate being pro medical procedure with being forced-abortion. Pro and forced do not mean the same.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I argue frequently with pro-forced birthers and they're rabidly puritanical. They still think sex is sinful and that women should be forced to give birth as a consequence.
They literally view pregnancy and childbirth as an appropriate punishment for enjoying sex. I mean think about how horrific that is.
You can't reason with people like that, they can't be reached, but we can try to counter their propaganda.
Taking away the stigma associated with abortion is one step in the right direction.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)"anti."
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Full disclosure, though - I am anti-republican.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Nice try, but misconstruing the FACTS is easy to spot here on DU, it's been used so many times to no avail.
Lebam in LA
(1,344 posts)I've met some of the most ardent pro-choicer's imaginable and not one of them is pro-abortion.
Hekate
(90,637 posts)pwb
(11,259 posts)I believe in free will and if we are judged it will be as individuals not as a country or government.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)ve of abortion BUT' or 'I'm personally against abortion BUT', etc,
Fomenting the idea that there is a negative moral implication to abortion is, at best, unhelpful. Frankly, I think it's inhumane to treat people like that.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Stop.
Voltaire2
(12,996 posts)There is nothing wrong with it. I'm also pro heart surgery,
LAS14
(13,781 posts)Some of us want to acknowledge the moral complexity of dealing with two lives. I'm pro choice all the way, but we impinge on other people's choice when we insist that "there's nothing wrong with it." We should just leave it that it can be a difficult decision, but that women have to make it for themselves.
Voltaire2
(12,996 posts)I reject your assumption that we are dealing with two lives.
LAS14
(13,781 posts)Voltaire2
(12,996 posts)On the other hand you seem to find it unacceptable that I am in favor of abortions just as I am in favor of heart surgery. You are the one rejecting the validity of the "pro abortion" position.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)when we insist that there's nothing wrong with it."
Please explain how, exactly, that impinges on anyone's choice.
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,973 posts)LAS14
(13,781 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(9,973 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm pro-contraception too.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)included!
Pachamama
(16,886 posts)This post is clearly bait...
Tetunot
(18 posts)Mind your own damn business! That's what I've named it. Don't dictate to me or any other woman what we can and can not do w/our bodies.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)No more and no less than we should be pro-refractive eye surgery.
(anyone could of course, add the irrelevance and absurdity of coerced refractive eye surgery, yet that particular is still both irrelevant and absurd).
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,973 posts)FSogol
(45,473 posts)Please prove your point by showing us all the mandatory abortion candidates.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)Skittles
(153,142 posts)because they're all for freedom unless it involves women making their own choices
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Iggo
(47,548 posts)One of those choices is abortion.
The rest are not.