General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Internet: Bite down on something hard, users, this one's gonna hurt.
You know how the courts will rule on this one, at least if it goes to the Supreme Court.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13510_3-57470566-21/verizon-wireless-wants-to-edit-your-internet-access/?tag=postrtcol;FD.posts
Verizon Wireless wants to 'edit' your Internet access
Here's a novel idea: Claim the First Amendment gives a carrier the right to pick and choose what you connect to via the Internet.
What if your wireless provider gave you Internet access and search results according to what it decided was a "priority"?
As a Verizon Wireless customer, I'm furious at the idea that it would "pick favorites" over what I was actually looking for -- especially if it was an emergency.
But that's just what Verizon is fighting in court to do right now. Verizon has filed a brief (Verizon vs. FCC) with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for the "freedom" to edit your Internet, dear customer.
If you think this would remain a Verizon issue, think again. If Verizon gatecrashes Internet access filtering, you better bet that other ISPs will hustle to get on the train to sell Internet "priority" spots to the highest bidders.
flamingdem
(39,322 posts)you can be sure that will be edited and fast.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)over content then they should also assume responsibility for the veracity of that content.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Occulus
(20,599 posts)If Verizon gets its way on this, and my interpretation is in fact correct, internet users will be able to kill Verizon by pirating content. I would vigorously encourage such action against them if that is in fact the case.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Trillo
(9,154 posts)hunter
(38,327 posts)... by blocking content the government doesn't approve of, severely throttling content from outside their systems, and inserting advertising in pages that don't belong to them.
Crap like this is why we need net neutrality.
Big American corporations wish the USA was a capitalist paradise like China, where the people are well conditioned to accept all manner of abuse from their corrupt government and wealthy corporations.
randome
(34,845 posts)But they clearly want the right to throttle up or down users they deem to be data hogs. That's bullshit on its own. The Internet should forever remain public domain and a public service with equal rights to access for all.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)It's usually in the form of taking over 404 pages or sending people who typo a domain to the ISP's search portal (who uses search portals? I mean, seriously?). Most of them want to do considerably more than that.
Controlling search engines in that sense would consist of hijacking the search returns and inserting the results they wanted near the top.
randome
(34,845 posts)Wasn't that something Microsoft/Bing was doing not long ago?
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)They're still being watched closely for IE shenanigans in the past, though I wouldn't put it past them.
The stuff I'm describing would have to be done at the level of the individual ISP, though. Microsoft doesn't have the ability to hijack traffic between my ISP and my computer, especially at the level of detail I'm talking about (or the simpler stuff I described seeing in my other post).
MoreGOPoop
(417 posts)occurrences with Hotmail's filter? Email from several sites that I had long ago established as "Safe" have recently begun showing up in my "Junk" folder as "Suspicious". When I found mail from Bernie, Reproductive Rights and Sunlight Foundation in there, I had a damn cow. And, there is no option to mark as safe.