Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBots accounted for 1/3 pro-Trump Twitter activity during 2016 debates
https://thenextweb.com/artificial-intelligence/2017/07/28/study-bots-accounted-for-a-third-of-all-pro-trump-twitter-activity-during-the-debate/#.tnw_FvMNlwuJThis semi-coherent baboon, for one night last October, reigned supreme; but was it of his own doing? Regardless of what the news outlets say or your sensibilities tell you for one night, Trump was king at least on Twitter. But as with all things surrounding the 2016 Presidential election, it might not be that simple.
A University of Oxford study indicates he may have had some help in the form of pro-Trump Twitter bots. These deplorable-bots (can we make that a thing?) tweeted approximately 576,178 times, accounting for nearly a third (32.7 percent) of all pro-Trump posts that evening and in the four days to follow.
To identify the bots, researchers looked for accounts that exclusively posted messages containing hashtags associated with a particular candidate. There were over a dozen hashtags used for each of the candidates to help identify bot activity.
The top three for Trump were:
#AmericaFirst
#deplorable
#NeverHillary
-----
To be fair there were Hillary bots too but they were minimal compared to Trump. And the Trump bots are still on Twitter and need to go.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2305 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bots accounted for 1/3 pro-Trump Twitter activity during 2016 debates (Original Post)
Maraya1969
Aug 2017
OP
underpants
(182,717 posts)1. but is part of Russia and its governments support for Mr. Trump
-Rob Goldstone
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)2. Notice each time there is polling problems with
Dipstick's numbers,these Russian Bots pop up . Gee,you would thing it was by design or something. Yah Right!
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)4. Yep.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)5. Are they coming from a BOT site in Northwestern Wisconsin?
Maraya1969
(22,474 posts)7. That and Anti-Hillary "news" would start showing up on Google
Piss me off to no end.
Thank God we are all learning these things now.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)8. Sure appears to be the case.
That and the Hillary story of her going to prison.
Wounded Bear
(58,618 posts)3. Sounds low to me...
benld74
(9,904 posts)6. Anyone with account can check real followers
Easily