Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 06:16 PM Sep 2017

Law prof explains legal reasoning why Trumps new memo puts Mike Pence in legal jeopardy for impea

Fordham University Law professor Jed Shugerman made one of the most damning case against Vice President Mike Pence for being involved in obstruction of justice.

The New York Times and Washington Post both broke stories about the original memo that President Donald Trump authored during a rainy day that would ultimately fire former FBI Director James Comey.

Shugerman told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell that the biggest name that has been associated with this memo and this conversation is Pence.

“Let me explain why this timeline puts him in legal jeopardy,” Shugerman began. “So, we know that this letter was drafted on one day, and then after Steven Miller came back with that draft, it was read in a room of people, including Vice President Pence. And when that letter was read, it had, quote, The New York Times talks about a screed, and it identified all of these other connections to the Russian probe for why Trump had decided to fire Jim Comey. Then after this letter is edited, Mike Pence then tells the media that the Comey firing was not connected to the Russian probe, and he said it was due to Rod Rosenstein’s recommendation. Those statements are untrue.”

He explained that because Pence heard the first letter and the second letter and lied about it, it now “implicates Mike Pence now in a combination of conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting obstruction of justice, and also a relatively less known felony called misprision of a felony.”

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/09/law-prof-explains-legal-reasoning-why-trumps-new-memo-puts-mike-pence-in-legal-jeopardy-for-impeachment/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
1. Could it be like with nixon and his VP that they go
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 06:31 PM
Sep 2017

for the low hanging fruit first?

pense is in it up to his ears and those doing the investigation know this as well and will go after him first to make sure he isn't installed as president.

George II

(67,782 posts)
4. Actually Agnew's resignation was completely unrelated to Watergate...
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 07:54 PM
Sep 2017

There was a Federal investigation of corruption in Baltimore (Agnew was previously Governor of Maryland) and the United States Attorney essentially stumbled upon Agnew during his investigation. Apparently Agnew had been getting kickbacks from contractors for years and even after he became Vice President.

He wound up pleading no lo contendre and was fined a nominal amount, and resigned.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
7. who is "they"?
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 07:59 PM
Sep 2017

Republicans who would need to initiate and support impeachment? Hah. They need him to sign the tax cuts.

Mueller? Schneidermann? If it is federal, tRump will just pardon Pence (and maybe himself). I don't think a sitting Prez can be indicted either, state or fed (altho I believe a civil suit can proceed).

And we know neither of these guys has any shame, so good luck with getting them to resign in disgrace.

tRump might decide that everyone is unfair and unkind and this whole thing just isn't any fun and we don't deserve him, anyway (he'd be right about that), and quit. But for the rest of us the only way out is through: retake Congress next year, and block / investigate everything and everybody until they can be replaced.

iluvtennis

(19,853 posts)
3. Had to look up the word 'screed' after hearing it twice today and reading it here...never heard ...
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 07:53 PM
Sep 2017

of it before today.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/screed

a: lengthy discourse
b : an informal piece of writing (such as a personal letter)
c : a ranting piece of writing

George II

(67,782 posts)
5. That seems to be the word o' the week this week. I've heard of it before but...
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 07:55 PM
Sep 2017

..have heard it dozens of times this week.

BigmanPigman

(51,590 posts)
11. 45 will pardon himself, Pence and whoever else he can.
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 08:33 PM
Sep 2017

At least Pence's name will be dirty (no more Mr. Clean) and NY state can nail 45 (no pardons for state crimes).

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
13. Trump pardoning himself for obstruction would itself be obstruction
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 09:12 PM
Sep 2017

He is caught in a trap and he can't get out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Law prof explains legal r...