Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,972 posts)
Mon Sep 4, 2017, 02:09 PM Sep 2017

For your conservative friends & family, an appeal on behalf of DACA based on economic costs

from the conservative libertarian CATO institute. (Normally, I wouldn't post anything from them, but I hope you'll understand why I made this exception.)

https://www.cato.org/blog/ending-daca-will-impose-billions-employer-compliance-costs

President Trump is reportedly considering pulling the plug on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allows about 800,000 immigrants who came to the U.S. as children to live and work here lawfully. If the president does decide to end the program, it will impose a massive cost on employers who currently employ these workers. The cost of recruiting and hiring new employees is expensive. Here are the facts:

DACA rescission will cost employers $6.3 billion in employee turnover costs, including recruiting, hiring, and training 720,000 new employees.
Every week for the next two years, U.S. employers will have to terminate 6,914 employees who currently participate in DACA at a weekly cost of $61 million.
Ending DACA would be the equivalent of 31 “major” regulations.

DACA recipients receive employment authorization documents (EADs). It is not illegal to work without authorization, but it is illegal for employers to hire someone who lacks authorization. Thus, DACA EADs essentially grant permission to employers to hire DACA beneficiaries for a given period—in this case, two years—without fear of employer sanctions for hiring an unauthorized worker. Note that the law prohibits employers from discriminating against foreign-born applicants purely because they have temporary authorization. Thus, if President Trump rescinds DACA, employers are the ones who will have to actually implement the policy by policing their workforce and firing DACA recipients. DACA repeal’s regulatory compliance burden will fall directly on American employers.

SNIP

President Trump is considering DACA rescission only under the threat of a lawsuit that claims DACA was unconstitutionally implemented. If that claim is valid, Congress should immediately act to pass legislation to extend employment authorization and legal status for these young immigrant workers. It should not choose to impose massive costs on employers and immigrants.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For your conservative friends & family, an appeal on behalf of DACA based on economic costs (Original Post) pnwmom Sep 2017 OP
I wonder which billionaire said DACA was unconstitutionally implemented? Kochs? Mercers? Waltons? Initech Sep 2017 #1

Initech

(100,054 posts)
1. I wonder which billionaire said DACA was unconstitutionally implemented? Kochs? Mercers? Waltons?
Mon Sep 4, 2017, 03:04 PM
Sep 2017

Time to come out of the shadows, we need to know who you are!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For your conservative fri...