Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This marks a dramatic change in tone from the Dems on the intel committees. Bolder, more certain (Original Post) bathroommonkey76 Sep 2017 OP
Grand Juries INDICT over 95% of the time. You can take that to the bank. Not Ruth Sep 2017 #1
Tea Pain has been pretty acurate dixiegrrrrl Sep 2017 #2
Well, the bonfires at the Russian embassies last week told us that Warpy Sep 2017 #3
I am content to wait on a watertight case gratuitous Sep 2017 #4
 

Not Ruth

(3,613 posts)
1. Grand Juries INDICT over 95% of the time. You can take that to the bank.
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 11:16 PM
Sep 2017

This is all that you need to know that indictment was certain months ago. They have the evidence and are testing it in front of a jury.


"There are THREE grand juries in different jurisdictions. Grand Juries INDICT over 95% of the time. You can take that to the bank."

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
2. Tea Pain has been pretty acurate
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 11:38 PM
Sep 2017

and there are a good number of Twitter journos who have come up with angles and sources long before MSM.
But yeah...if that letter has made the rounds, it is a nice smoking gun.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
3. Well, the bonfires at the Russian embassies last week told us that
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 12:08 AM
Sep 2017

We really didn't need any confirmation from the rumor mill.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. I am content to wait on a watertight case
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 12:21 AM
Sep 2017

I know some people are hanging fire because of the misrule of the Trump administration, but as the old saying goes, when you shoot at a king, you must kill him (note: I am quoting a saying, not advocating regicide). But I want there to be no escape hatches, no doubt - reasonable or otherwise - that Trump is guilty as all hell. I've listened to Republican bellyaching about Nixon for more than 40 years. I don't want to spend the rest of my days listening to their caterwauling about how Trump was hounded from office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This marks a dramatic cha...