Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,167 posts)
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 05:38 AM Sep 2017

House defeats conservative effort to defund Amtrak

The House rejected a conservative proposal late Wednesday night to eliminate $1.1 billion in federal subsidies for Amtrak.

An amendment offered by Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) to a government spending package for the next fiscal year failed on a 128-293 vote with a bipartisan coalition uniting in opposition.

Brooks, a member of the House Freedom Caucus who failed to advance in the Alabama Senate GOP primary last month, argued that Amtrak subsidies were unnecessary.

“Stated differently, what policy justification is there for forcing Americans who don’t use Amtrak to subsidize the travel of Americans who do use Amtrak? I know of none,” Brooks said during House floor debate.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/railroads/349573-house-defeats-conservative-effort-to-defund-amtrak

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House defeats conservative effort to defund Amtrak (Original Post) TexasTowelie Sep 2017 OP
"Why?" is now the Republican Divisive Rationale, promoted by Mulvaney. WinkyDink Sep 2017 #1
good freddyvh Sep 2017 #2
Excellent! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2017 #3
Representative Brooks - the same policy justification that forces Americans... George II Sep 2017 #4
Short sighted corrupt small minded people! Dustlawyer Sep 2017 #7
What a ass**** instead of beefing up and modernizing our "INFRASTRUCTURE" this ass**** turbinetree Sep 2017 #5
Fuck the Freedom Caucus! bronxiteforever Sep 2017 #6
Stated differently . . . HughBeaumont Sep 2017 #8
I don't use nuclear weapons, tanks, figther planes nor aircraft carriers! machoneman Sep 2017 #9
Yay! Blue Owl Sep 2017 #10
Wow! That certainly IS stated differently! Iggo Sep 2017 #11

George II

(67,782 posts)
4. Representative Brooks - the same policy justification that forces Americans...
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 06:30 AM
Sep 2017

...who don't get hit by hurricanes to subsidize rebuilding your states every couple of years.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
7. Short sighted corrupt small minded people!
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 08:07 AM
Sep 2017

America would have never been what it is today if we had more like this idiot. No moon landing, no leadership of the Free World (that is gone now thanks to Trump and Republicans), no innovation, none of the medical break-throughs, nothing!

We need high speed rail powered by solar and wind. We need more big thinking! The wealthy who can do those things only know to hoard and take advantage of the Wall Street casino where they have the advantage over the small investors.

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
5. What a ass**** instead of beefing up and modernizing our "INFRASTRUCTURE" this ass****
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 07:00 AM
Sep 2017

wanted this country to go further into a failed third rate state, while the other industrialized countries are putting billions and millions into public train service.

Why is this POS still in office?

And as for his f*cking logic:

“Stated differently, what policy justification is there for forcing Americans who don’t use Amtrak to subsidize the travel of Americans who do use Amtrak? I know of none,” Brooks said during House floor debate."

Well ass**** it's because we are in this "all" together, like the framers intended, so the question that needs to be asked and, "stated differently" why are taxpayers paying for a $174,000 a year by forcing Americans to subsidize a ...........F*CKING IDIOT?



HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
8. Stated differently . . .
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 08:15 AM
Sep 2017

. . . what policy justification is there for forcing Americans who don’t want to fight useless, wasteful and deadly wars to subsidize the corporations who think these useless, wasteful and deadly wars are necessary? I know of none.

Wow, Mo . . . I can do that too.

machoneman

(4,007 posts)
9. I don't use nuclear weapons, tanks, figther planes nor aircraft carriers!
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 08:29 AM
Sep 2017

Why, oh why should I subsidize them?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House defeats conservativ...