Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussian Operatives Bought U.S. Political Ads on Facebook. Heres Why Thats a Big Deal.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/09/06/why_russian_operatives_buying_american_political_ads_on_facebook_is_such.htmlFuture Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Sept. 6 2017 9:55 PM
Russian Operatives Bought U.S. Political Ads on Facebook. Heres Why Thats a Big Deal.
By Will Oremus
Pressed by investigators in Congress, Facebook said Wednesday that it has found evidence that a pro-Kremlin Russian troll farm bought $100,000 worth of ads targeted at U.S. voters between 2015 and 2017. The finding was first reported by the Washington Post, and Facebook published its own statement Wednesday afternoon.
A few of the roughly 3,000 ads that Facebook traced to the Russian company mentioned presidential candidates Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton directly, according to the Posts sources. The majority focused on stoking peoples emotions around divisive issues such as gun rights and immigration fears, as well as gay rights and racial discrimination.
Facebook wouldnt disclose the ads in question, nor exactly how the scheme worked. But it said the tactics were consistent with those outlined in a white paper on information operations that the company published in April. That white paper described how trolls and foreign agents can use false accounts to amplify divisive messages and disinformation on Facebooks platform.
One hundred thousand dollars in ad spending might not sound like a lot of money, but its a big deal for at least five reasons.
First, it confirms that Facebook was one of the pathways by which Russian operatives sought to influence the U.S. election.
Second, it raises the question of how those Russian operatives knew which U.S. voters to target, and whether the Trump campaign might have played any role.
Third, it casts a new light on Facebooks fake news problem, which looks more sinister if some of the misinformation spread on the platform in the runup to the U.S. election was fueled by Russian-funded ad dollars or troll networks.
Fourth, it suggests that Facebook may have a more widespread oversight problem in its ad sales. As the Posts story notes, its illegal for foreign nationals or governments to buy ads or spend money aimed at influencing a U.S. election. It now seems clear theyve been using Facebook to do just that.
Finally, while $100,000 amounts to a miniscule fraction of U.S. election spending, it could go a long way in amplifying posts among a targeted audience. Facebook said only about 25 percent of the ads were geographically targeted. But its worth remembering that the company has a history of not being forthcoming when it comes to the scale and mechanisms of misinformation on its platform. Its possible that the activities the company has uncovered and disclosed so far represent only a small part of a larger problem.
Second, it raises the question of how those Russian operatives knew which U.S. voters to target, and whether the Trump campaign might have played any role.
Third, it casts a new light on Facebooks fake news problem, which looks more sinister if some of the misinformation spread on the platform in the runup to the U.S. election was fueled by Russian-funded ad dollars or troll networks.
Fourth, it suggests that Facebook may have a more widespread oversight problem in its ad sales. As the Posts story notes, its illegal for foreign nationals or governments to buy ads or spend money aimed at influencing a U.S. election. It now seems clear theyve been using Facebook to do just that.
Finally, while $100,000 amounts to a miniscule fraction of U.S. election spending, it could go a long way in amplifying posts among a targeted audience. Facebook said only about 25 percent of the ads were geographically targeted. But its worth remembering that the company has a history of not being forthcoming when it comes to the scale and mechanisms of misinformation on its platform. Its possible that the activities the company has uncovered and disclosed so far represent only a small part of a larger problem.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1166 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian Operatives Bought U.S. Political Ads on Facebook. Heres Why Thats a Big Deal. (Original Post)
babylonsister
Sep 2017
OP
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)1. republicans smirking and snickering at the undermining of American democracy
"Ha ha." - republicans against American democracy
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)2. Boycott Facebook because not only did they sell the ads to Russia
they lied about it until they were finally caught
Girard442
(6,067 posts)3. Time to establish new memes, like:
"Facebook is a sewer. Why are you playing in it?"
dalton99a
(81,432 posts)4. Betcha it was a lot more than $100,000