General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmazon wants to open a $5 billion second HQ in North America
Amazon has announced plans to open a second headquarters in North America that will employ as many as 50,000 workers.
The company announced Thursday that it is searching for a city to host the new "HQ2" facility, which will cost at least $5 billion to construct and operate.
"We expect HQ2 to be a full equal to our Seattle headquarters," said Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. "Amazon HQ2 will bring billions of dollars in up-front and ongoing investments, and tens of thousands of high-paying jobs. We're excited to find a second home."
Amazon (AMZN, Tech30) said it would prefer to open the headquarters in a suburban or urban area with more than 1 million people. It's looking for a community that "thinks big."
The company said that while it would hire teams and executives for the new location, employees who currently work in Seattle would be offered the chance to relocate.
Cities and regional economic development organizations have been invited to submit proposals.
The company's headquarters in Seattle boasts 33 buildings and 24 restaurants or cafes. It covers 8.1 million square feet.
Hmm...think they'll choose a city that needs jobs like Detroit or Baltimore? Or a city that could use some Hurricane rebuilding like Houston? If they go to Mexico or Canada, I would blame Trump. Vancouver would just be too funny.
dalton99a
(81,428 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,323 posts)IronLionZion
(45,410 posts)mostly in warehouses in places like Chattanooga and Baltimore. But also Ohio, Kentucky, Wisconsin, New Jersey, Illinois and Indiana.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)But it's not a major city. Close to one though.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)It would make traffic there even worse, though
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)(I lived there last year for a campaign and am determined to go back).
Amazon has a great opportunity here to revitalize a Rust Belt city. Also a dead mall would be a good place to put HQ2.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Al through the Pacific Northwest I-5 corridor has become impossible
IronLionZion
(45,410 posts)I thought it would be funny because it's so close to Seattle yet outside of Trump's economic reach
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)That would send trump into a tailspin
haveahart
(905 posts)I don't think it would be wise to build in flood-prone or fire-prone areas. That would attract more development in disaster areas. The country can't afford that. It would seem to me that "coal country" would be a prime target for the possible benefits; but then, any business to succeed would need a sober, dependable, well trained workforce. Location could also turn a red state blue for the future. Lots of things to think about.
Glorfindel
(9,726 posts)n/t
CurtEastPoint
(18,636 posts)other transportation, the space, the workforce. Huge win.
Glorfindel
(9,726 posts)Seattle to Atlanta. If I were 40 years younger, I'd be looking forward to applying for a job.
CurtEastPoint
(18,636 posts)anyway if it comes about!
CurtEastPoint
(18,636 posts)I know that some places give the store away but to lure something that big?
muntrv
(14,505 posts)LonePirate
(13,414 posts)These cities have plenty of land, are ascendant/growing and have a large, educated and young workforce. I'm not sure cities like Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit or St. Louis have a chance even if they offer massive tax abatements.
unc70
(6,110 posts)Everyone and his brother is chasing this opportunity. Looking at Amazon's requirements, it doesn't look likely for anywhere depressed. Quality of life, availability of professional work force, infrastructure (highways, air, high speed communications), land, etc.
Looks like it will go somewhere already doing well, already with nonstop flights to Seattle.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Southern, urban, not in hurricane, earthquake or tornado zones. Other corner. They'd save a mint on transportation costs.
HAB911
(8,874 posts)Republican Communism
IronLionZion
(45,410 posts)Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Boston, Bridgeport, Denver, New York, Provo, Raleigh, Tampa and Washington DC
The case for DC would be the fact that Amazon has been increasing their government cloud services and it is a very competitive market. They have an office here that is expected to grow. Baltimore is nearby, has a large fulfillment center, and needs jobs.
Other cities might have cheaper land, labor, and have money to bribe them with tax breaks. They like to place their data centers in areas with cheap electricity but it doesn't have to be near their headquarters. Most lists I've seen include Atlanta and Austin.
bathroommonkey76
(3,827 posts)IronLionZion
(45,410 posts)Chicago, Toronto, Dallas, Boston, Pittsburgh, Columbus, Detroit have shown interest. Let's see how badly they want it. This is so exciting