Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Irma, what makes it turn north?? (Original Post) Watchfoxheadexplodes Sep 2017 OP
Per NHC Roland99 Sep 2017 #1
I said yesterday that I think it could move further west into the Gulf and go north BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #2
Pressure differentials Loki Liesmith Sep 2017 #3
Explanation given by a meterologist nmgaucho Sep 2017 #4
Thanks all Watchfoxheadexplodes Sep 2017 #5
Weather is a hard problem. Igel Sep 2017 #7
call weather forecast models and the EGRI model has been pretty damn consistent beachbum bob Sep 2017 #6
When we had actual weather maps it was easier to follow. Igel Sep 2017 #8
Because Bengahzi!! nt RainCaster Sep 2017 #9
It's all over the weather sites and tv weather SharonClark Sep 2017 #10

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
1. Per NHC
Sat Sep 9, 2017, 09:44 AM
Sep 2017

The initial motion is now 285/10. Irma is moving along the
southwestern side of the subtropical ridge, which is about to
weaken due to a mid- to upper-level trough moving into the
southeastern United States. The track guidance is in good
agreement that Irma should continue west-northwestward for the next
12-24 h, followed by a turn toward the north-northwest that would
take the center parallel to the west coast of the Florida
peninsula. Later in the forecast period, the cyclone should turn
northwestward and eventually stall as it interacts with the
aforementioned trough.

BigmanPigman

(51,590 posts)
2. I said yesterday that I think it could move further west into the Gulf and go north
Sat Sep 9, 2017, 09:46 AM
Sep 2017

toward the panhandle. It seems to continue to do this but I don't know what the highs and lows are doing in that area Hurricanes are so unpredictable and no one should ever blame the forecasters for unnecessary evacuations.

nmgaucho

(527 posts)
4. Explanation given by a meterologist
Sat Sep 9, 2017, 09:49 AM
Sep 2017

"A dip in the Jet, will pick it up like someone floating on an inner tube in the Guadalupe is in a cutoff eddy then gets caught back in the current and starts moving again. Irma is riding the Easterly trades, which is a summer occurrence, westward. Once they get far enough west, the Jet and continental steering currents over or just off the land mass take over and generally blow west to east.

When and where a storm turns north depends on a lot of things, but essentially how those things arrange themselves and line up to push storms.

Sad thing is that a week ago, a trough of low pressure was hanging out on the SE coast. If Irma came by then, she'd have turned up and back out to the Atlantic. But the Atlantic subtropical high pushed it back (westward), the trough retreated, and the Jet dipped south and west to where its strongest winds are now (SW of Florida, up through the state). The Jet is flowing along the western edge of that high, where the current is now."

Igel

(35,300 posts)
7. Weather is a hard problem.
Sat Sep 9, 2017, 10:05 AM
Sep 2017

There are a lot of things that affect it, and a lot of things that affect those. Even if we had all the math right to be able to be really precise and accurate, we'd probably lack (a) inputs, the data necessary for doing the math and (b) computational power to run the scenarios.

All three have improved in the last century, by a large amount.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
6. call weather forecast models and the EGRI model has been pretty damn consistent
Sat Sep 9, 2017, 10:01 AM
Sep 2017

for past 4 days on Irma tracking to the west side/west half of Florida. Computers and data can and will give accurate forecasts, especially the European model

Igel

(35,300 posts)
8. When we had actual weather maps it was easier to follow.
Sat Sep 9, 2017, 10:08 AM
Sep 2017

They'd show high pressure areas and pressure areas, they'd show ridges and troughs. It was easier to follow and we didn't have accurate but useless things like "steering currents" as the only thing to hang understanding on.

So much so that one person was able to say that the "steering currents" (which in the case of Harvey was mostly just a high pressure system, but high pressure in one place + low pressure in another will give you "current&quot were breaking down because of "global warming." Instead of, "Oh, the high pressure system is weakening because, well, that's what all high pressure systems have eventually done."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Irma, what makes it turn ...