Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
in Your Face MSM! (Original Post) kpete Sep 2017 OP
i love seeing the men in line. Very self actualized!! samnsara Sep 2017 #1
I am not sure why it is a surprise to see men in line. pangaia Sep 2017 #52
Any man with half a brain was a Hillary voter workinclasszero Sep 2017 #59
I'm sure many in the media are squirming...they know the damage they did. Lucinda Sep 2017 #2
Nah, they'll do what they always do gratuitous Sep 2017 #6
Panties are in knots all over the interwebs about how this "proves nothing" ehrnst Sep 2017 #10
Love these tshirts! calimary Sep 2017 #63
It looks like a bigger crowd than attended the Trump coronation. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #3
This is EXACTLY why anyone saying we must forget about last year and move on, is wrong. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #4
Yep. ehrnst Sep 2017 #9
+++ heaven05 Sep 2017 #33
Electronic voting machines in 2000??? scipan Sep 2017 #64
okay heaven05 Sep 2017 #67
Looks like a bigger crowd.... chillfactor Sep 2017 #5
Probably bigger than the one on inauguration day, also. eom SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #16
The mainstream media doesn't want to admit what they did. Afromania Sep 2017 #7
Amen! llmart Sep 2017 #8
Oh, Afromania, thank you for this post! Control-Z Sep 2017 #43
Agreed and thank you - well said! c-rational Sep 2017 #45
What's the plural of 'remora?' dchill Sep 2017 #46
Fantastic post. Agree 1000%! ClusterFreak Sep 2017 #50
Yup. America still hasn't discussed the military "analyst" scandal sharedvalues Sep 2017 #51
Yes the news media (new$ infotainment industry) sold us down the river FakeNoose Sep 2017 #53
You aren't naive at all. It most likely came down from the top. I'm a bit old skool in my thinking Afromania Sep 2017 #54
Absolutely - the reporters were steaming mad but they had to keep their jobs FakeNoose Sep 2017 #62
I have two words for the MSM (and the Hate Media). Boomerproud Sep 2017 #11
+1 eom LittleGirl Sep 2017 #13
Uh, she won the election.. by more than 3 million votes.. mountain grammy Sep 2017 #12
Bingo. dalton99a Sep 2017 #42
Look at all those young people lining up to buy Hillary's book. yardwork Sep 2017 #14
I sm so happy . . . peggysue2 Sep 2017 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2017 #18
Can you link to some of these reviews? canetoad Sep 2017 #20
We're talking about Amazon reviews. George II Sep 2017 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2017 #41
Many of the negative reviews don't even address the book at all, they attack.... George II Sep 2017 #21
Sometimes, peggysue2 Sep 2017 #38
Which members of the press said THAT? SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #17
Nor do I, and I refuse to pay for Anchorage Dispatch or Fairbanks Daily News-Minus raven mad Sep 2017 #19
I still haven't heard specifically which members of the media said they were "mystified." SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #22
That's what was wondering. I haven't heard anyone in the MSM say that. nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #25
Without proof, it's flame throwing. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #27
I think so, too. I've heard MSM talking about her book, and they were complimentary... Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #29
Where did the MSM insist no one was interested? melman Sep 2017 #23
I'm waiting for an answer to that myself. nt SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #24
I can give you one, and probably find more. Google is your friend. raven mad Sep 2017 #26
Sarah Huckabee Sanders is not the press. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #28
USA Today reporting it is the press. eom raven mad Sep 2017 #35
USA TODAY is quoting Huckabee Sanders. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #47
So this entire thread is a made up narrative...LOL snooper2 Sep 2017 #55
Well, heck, why not? I recall some from wayback that were this fun. raven mad Sep 2017 #56
Is she the 'MSM' melman Sep 2017 #30
Clinton's book is a lie? Says the administration that has made its living on lies. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #32
Did you really expect Sarah Huckabee Sanders to tout Clinton's book? eom SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #31
Here's a few blogslut Sep 2017 #37
None of those say 'no one is intersted' melman Sep 2017 #39
Haha okay! blogslut Sep 2017 #40
Oh stop it. Words matter. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #48
Completely invented. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2017 #49
And if she comes here to CA San Francisco bay area, we will line up too. Please, please :-) iluvtennis Sep 2017 #34
And I guarantee the just-turned-blue OC, CA Control-Z Sep 2017 #44
those "people" are actually just russian bots unblock Sep 2017 #57
they were hoping that saying it enough times would make it so. FU msm--you are COMPLICIT niyad Sep 2017 #58
+1 oasis Sep 2017 #60
awesome !!! i just posted this picture and tweet to my facebook wall. trueblue2007 Sep 2017 #61
K&R Scurrilous Sep 2017 #65
Good Going Hillary Clinton....we still love you! onecent Sep 2017 #66
I hope the sales of her book are record breaking! smirkymonkey Sep 2017 #68

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Nah, they'll do what they always do
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:33 PM
Sep 2017

Dismiss the crowd as nothing more than a focus group or some other irrelevancy, and then go haring off to film six guys with a confederate flag marching around East Bumblefuck, Virginia.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
10. Panties are in knots all over the interwebs about how this "proves nothing"
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:37 PM
Sep 2017

and HRC bribed them with pizza, and go away and shut the fuck up, you remind me of MAAAAAAAHHHHHMMM and I moved out MONTHS AGO, DAMNIT!

And the basement dwellers on all over the Amazon book page, saying, "She ghost wrote this, losers" and other things that they would normally reserve for their local newspaper comments section.

The "rogue DNC" facebook page is organizing protests at her appearances. The broflakes are restless, and their sorry asses are being met with this:




Eliot Rosewater

(31,104 posts)
4. This is EXACTLY why anyone saying we must forget about last year and move on, is wrong.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:20 PM
Sep 2017

We cant move on as if what happened did not happen, everything we do now is based on the stolen election by racists and the KGB.

(yes, I know it is called GRU)

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
9. Yep.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:33 PM
Sep 2017

There are some saying this who are afraid of this.

Some dismissed HRC talking about the election as "silly" but the lightness seemed forced.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
33. +++
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 08:08 PM
Sep 2017

she should be POTUS. Electronic voting machines were hacked in 2000--by who knows who, rove et al., just as treasonous as these fascist, racist aholes we have in place now 'running' our country and in 2016 by we know who what a fucked up situation. We will never have fair elections anymore until we go back to paper and pen-pencil voting.

scipan

(2,333 posts)
64. Electronic voting machines in 2000???
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 03:55 PM
Sep 2017

I remember Cruella announcing this great new way to vote - electronic voting machines - in 2001. I think you've got your dates off.

Afromania

(2,768 posts)
7. The mainstream media doesn't want to admit what they did.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:33 PM
Sep 2017

I wasn't originally in the Hillary camp(Bernie in the primary) so I'm somewhat objective here. They beat on her and beat on her and beat on her some more. Bernie beat on her and beat on her and beat on her some more when it was time to admit defeat. At no point did they think it was time for him to let it go.

Meanwhile, they gave legitimacy to that asshole trump by playing entire trump speeches and letting his surrogates run rampant and unchecked. Now they want to sweep that dirt under the rug and admit no part in bringing about this clusterfuck of epic proportions. No-sir, the media assholes played for ratings and aided in putting that fucking skunk and cabal of skunks into office.

I have completely written off a whole slew of media including some of the talking heads on our side. We needed these people to use their platforms and form a political bulwark to stop the spread of lies trump surrogates were pushing. Not only did they fail to do that but they simultaneously beat the shit out of Hillary about those goddamn emails. They had one job as purveyors of news and abject in their failure to do so only magnifies my anger toward them now.

I'm still pissed at how they helped flush this country down the drain through inaction. I don't care how hard they go at Trump now. It's always going to be a stain on their reps as far as I'm concerned.

llmart

(15,524 posts)
8. Amen!
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:06 PM
Sep 2017

Great post and you say exactly how I feel. We will not forget the free pass the media gave dumphead just because his outrageous behavior would get them ratings.

ClusterFreak

(3,112 posts)
50. Fantastic post. Agree 1000%!
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 07:01 AM
Sep 2017

Also kinda reminds me of the lapdogs they were in the run up to the Iraq war. They were friggin' horny for war and greedily suckled at Dubbya's teat all the way to Baghdad and beyond (Sorry for the visual there lol). And then, when the orgasmic afterglow of Shock and Awe faded into just a smile on their faces which their spouse wouldn't understand, they decided - a thousand days late and a few billion dollars short - that maybe invading Iraq wasn't such a good idea after all. Ya know, seeing as the pretext was based on a demonstrable, provable lie and all.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
51. Yup. America still hasn't discussed the military "analyst" scandal
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 08:22 AM
Sep 2017

The NYT got a Pulitzer for exposing that the Pentagon was telling its analysts what lies to tell on TV. And the broadcast media has not ever discussed it.

FakeNoose

(32,527 posts)
53. Yes the news media (new$ infotainment industry) sold us down the river
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 11:44 AM
Sep 2017

...all for a few bucks of easy ad money. "Donald Trump is good for business."

We should never forget that! It's the CEOs and owners of the newspapers and radio/TV outlets who gave Trump the free blowjobs last year. I don't believe that the reporters themselves wanted to give Trump a pass, but their bosses MADE THEM DO IT!

Maybe I'm really naive, though.

Afromania

(2,768 posts)
54. You aren't naive at all. It most likely came down from the top. I'm a bit old skool in my thinking
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 12:29 PM
Sep 2017

Last edited Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:56 PM - Edit history (3)

that if you are in the news business, including the talking heads, you have a responsibility to the public. You have that responsibility to that public because most automatically take the position that you are respectable, have integrity and are a journalist of some sort.

Some of us understand that they aren't all actual Journalists, but most people don't really make the distinction. The news folk needed to trade on this granted integrity and defend the public that gives it to them. They didn't, whatever the circumstances and now, at least for this guy, the journalistic/news trust and integrity they've been granted has been shot. I can only see them now as what they are. Paid shills for whatever the network deems most profitable.

It's not to say that they can't do good work now, but when we needed them most they failed spectacularly. On the other hand there were some that went to bat for us and fought back against the narrative like warriors. They placed their careers squarely in the sights of the higher ups and took the fight to trump and his surrogates lies.

FakeNoose

(32,527 posts)
62. Absolutely - the reporters were steaming mad but they had to keep their jobs
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:53 PM
Sep 2017

That's why Katy Tur and others are writing books now. They want to tell the truth, the way they couldn't during the campaign. I've read several including the one by Matt Taibbi. "Insane Clown President, Dispatches from the 2016 Circus," which was hilarious and maddening.


So my point was that the rules all changed in the last couple of years. The hard news doesn't sell the newpapers anymore so advertising is king now, and that's why these reporters are losing their jobs. The newspapers are shutting down or going digital, 24/7 fake/celebrity news. Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow are turning in their graves.

peggysue2

(10,819 posts)
15. I sm so happy . . .
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:01 PM
Sep 2017

to see her having this success. No one deserves it more after the meat grinder she was put through.

Interesting to note (according to an article on the DU boards) that the Trumpanzees are swarming Amazon with bad, hateful reviews. Of a book they undoubtedly haven't read. This is exactly what we need to be aware of on all social media platforms--this swarming action is what happened in 2016. We didn't know then what we know now.

Time for insecticide, me thinks!

PS: On Amazon's verified purchase reviews, the book is getting 4-5 stars, mostly 5s. I suspect Amazon was alerted to the haters' bogus review action. Hillary's friends are pushing back. Good one on them.

Response to peggysue2 (Reply #15)

canetoad

(17,129 posts)
20. Can you link to some of these reviews?
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:31 PM
Sep 2017

It's all very well to say so but I need to read this for myself.

Response to canetoad (Reply #20)

George II

(67,782 posts)
21. Many of the negative reviews don't even address the book at all, they attack....
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:41 PM
Sep 2017

....Clinton's character. It's just another free outlet for the right to attack her.

peggysue2

(10,819 posts)
38. Sometimes,
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 08:57 PM
Sep 2017

you fight fire with fire.

This is one of those times, in my mind. Because we saw what swarming did in respect to political thought and opinion in 2016. I'm all for being above board and better than . . . But this propaganda technique hacked American minds with absolutely disastrous results. We shouldn't let it slide or go without a concerted push back.

Because we know now what we didn't know then.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
19. Nor do I, and I refuse to pay for Anchorage Dispatch or Fairbanks Daily News-Minus
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:21 PM
Sep 2017

or Juneau Empire to find out what's happening online...............

I do read a lot on line, though, and yeah the MSM (the ones that RWNJ's are always screaming LIBERAL about) - trashed her constantly.

So I ordered the book online today!

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
22. I still haven't heard specifically which members of the media said they were "mystified."
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:42 PM
Sep 2017

I didn't use the word. The OP did.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
29. I think so, too. I've heard MSM talking about her book, and they were complimentary...
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:56 PM
Sep 2017

how brave it was for her to put it all out there, etc. No one said they didn't want her to speak or write a book.

Bill Maher said she should go away. Her day is over. But he's not MSM. He's a political comedian.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
26. I can give you one, and probably find more. Google is your friend.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:54 PM
Sep 2017
One person who appears to have no interest in reading Hillary Clinton's new memoir: Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

On Tuesday, the White House press secretary attacked the release of the book.

"I think it's sad that after Hillary Clinton ran one of the most negative campaigns in history and lost... the last chapter of her public life is gonna be now defined by propping up book sales with false and reckless attacks," Sanders told reporters.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/09/12/sarah-huckabee-sanders-hillary-clintons-book-filled-false-and-reckless-attacks/658905001/

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
47. USA TODAY is quoting Huckabee Sanders.
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 12:59 AM
Sep 2017

USA TODAY did not take a position. USA TODAY reported what she said.

You haven't proved anything.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
55. So this entire thread is a made up narrative...LOL
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 12:33 PM
Sep 2017

I guess it must be a slow day for people. That time would be better spent cleaning up the rotting celery in the bottom of the fridge

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
56. Well, heck, why not? I recall some from wayback that were this fun.
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 12:39 PM
Sep 2017

And they didn't involve orange, or skinny, or really really bad decisions or North Korea or a WANT to go to war, or a white racist......... or..........

tps://i.pinimg.com/736x/07/e6/a4/07e6a48f8594cc63e8535dfb4ecb04e8--trump-meme-funny-funny-memes.jpg

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
32. Clinton's book is a lie? Says the administration that has made its living on lies.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 08:01 PM
Sep 2017

Slightly off topic.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
39. None of those say 'no one is intersted'
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 09:05 PM
Sep 2017

It's an invented narrative. People find it pleasing for whatever reason but it's not real.

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
48. Oh stop it. Words matter.
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:02 AM
Sep 2017

Those are book reviews. That is not "the press" saying anything.

You proved nothing except that some opinionated people don't like her book. That is hardly "the media."

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
44. And I guarantee the just-turned-blue OC, CA
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 11:48 PM
Sep 2017

will do the same. Please, please, please, Hillary, come to OC.

niyad

(112,948 posts)
58. they were hoping that saying it enough times would make it so. FU msm--you are COMPLICIT
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:00 PM
Sep 2017

in the disaster that is the orange madman's maladministration.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
68. I hope the sales of her book are record breaking!
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 05:50 PM
Sep 2017

So great to see so much interest in her book. I can't wait to read it!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»in Your Face MSM!