Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

factfinder_77

(841 posts)
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:32 PM Sep 2017

John Conyers, Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act - has 117 sponsors - No need for Sanders plan

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/676/
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/676/text
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/8/28/16114436/john-conyers-single-payer-insurance

Introduced 01/24/2017, it has 117 sponsors in Congress.


EC. 101. ELIGIBILITY AND REGISTRATION.
(a) In General.—All individuals residing in the United States (including any territory of the United States) are covered under the Medicare For All Program entitling them to a universal, best quality standard of care. Each such individual shall receive a card with a unique number in the mail. An individual’s Social Security number shall not be used for purposes of registration under this section.

(b) Registration.—Individuals and families shall receive a Medicare For All Program Card in the mail, after filling out a Medicare For All Program application form at a health care provider. Such application form shall be no more than 2 pages long.

(c) Presumption.—Individuals who present themselves for covered services from a participating provider shall be presumed to be eligible for benefits under this Act, but shall complete an application for benefits in order to receive a Medicare For All Program Card and have payment made for such benefits.

(d) Residency Criteria.—The Secretary shall promulgate a rule that provides criteria for determining residency for eligibility purposes under the Medicare For All Program.

(e) Coverage For Visitors.—The Secretary shall promulgate a rule regarding visitors from other countries who seek premeditated non-emergency surgical procedures. Such a rule should facilitate the establishment of country-to-country reimbursement arrangements or self pay arrangements between the visitor and the provider of care.


SEC. 102. BENEFITS AND PORTABILITY.
(a) In General.—The health care benefits under this Act cover all medically necessary services, including at least the following:

(1) Primary care and prevention.

(2) Approved dietary and nutritional therapies.

(3) Inpatient care.

(4) Outpatient care.

(5) Emergency care.

(6) Prescription drugs.

(7) Durable medical equipment.

(8) Long-term care.

(9) Palliative care.

(10) Mental health services.

(11) The full scope of dental services, services, including periodontics, oral surgery, and endodontics, but not including cosmetic dentistry.

(12) Substance abuse treatment services.

(13) Chiropractic services, not including electrical stimulation.

(14) Basic vision care and vision correction (other than laser vision correction for cosmetic purposes).

(15) Hearing services, including coverage of hearing aids.

(16) Podiatric care.

(b) Portability.—Such benefits are available through any licensed health care clinician anywhere in the United States that is legally qualified to provide the benefits.

(c) No Cost-Sharing.—No deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing shall be imposed with respect to covered benefits.


SEC. 103. QUALIFICATION OF PARTICIPATING PROVIDERS.
(a) Requirement To Be Public Or Non-Profit.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—No institution may be a participating provider unless it is a public or not-for-profit institution. Private physicians, private clinics, and private health care providers shall continue to operate as private entities, but are prohibited from being investor owned.

(2) CONVERSION OF INVESTOR-OWNED PROVIDERS.—For-profit providers of care opting to participate shall be required to convert to not-for-profit status.

(3) PRIVATE DELIVERY OF CARE REQUIREMENT.—For-profit providers of care that convert to non-profit status shall remain privately owned and operated entities.

(4) COMPENSATION FOR CONVERSION.—The owners of such for-profit providers shall be compensated for reasonable financial losses incurred as a result of the conversion from for-profit to non-profit status.

(5) FUNDING.—There are authorized to be appropriated from the Treasury such sums as are necessary to compensate investor-owned providers as provided for under paragraph (3).

(6) REQUIREMENTS.—The payments to owners of converting for-profit providers shall occur during a 15-year period, through the sale of U.S. Treasury Bonds. Payment for conversions under paragraph (3) shall not be made for loss of business profits.

(7) MECHANISM FOR CONVERSION PROCESS.—The Secretary shall promulgate a rule to provide a mechanism to further the timely, efficient, and feasible conversion of for-profit providers of care.

(b) Quality Standards.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Health care delivery facilities must meet State quality and licensing guidelines as a condition of participation under such program, including guidelines regarding safe staffing and quality of care.

(2) LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS.—Participating clinicians must be licensed in their State of practice and meet the quality standards for their area of care. No clinician whose license is under suspension or who is under disciplinary action in any State may be a participating provider.

(c) Participation Of Health Maintenance Organizations.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Non-profit health maintenance organizations that deliver care in their own facilities and employ clinicians on a salaried basis may participate in the program and receive global budgets or capitation payments as specified in section 202.

(2) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS.—Other health maintenance organizations which principally contract to pay for services delivered by non-employees shall be classified as insurance plans. Such organizations shall not be participating providers, and are subject to the regulations promulgated by reason of section 104(a) (relating to prohibition against duplicating coverage).

(d) Freedom Of Choice.—Patients shall have free choice of participating physicians and other clinicians, hospitals, and inpatient care facilities.


SEC. 104. PROHIBITION AGAINST DUPLICATING COVERAGE.
(a) In General.—It is unlawful for a private health insurer to sell health insurance coverage that duplicates the benefits provided under this Act.

(b) Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed as prohibiting the sale of health insurance coverage for any additional benefits not covered by this Act, such as for cosmetic surgery or other services and items that are not medically necessary.


31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Conyers, Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act - has 117 sponsors - No need for Sanders plan (Original Post) factfinder_77 Sep 2017 OP
At this point 45 is so lost in the woods, and so desperate for any kind of win lindysalsagal Sep 2017 #1
Conyers and Sanders have been working as PARTNERS for decades toward single payer. phleshdef Sep 2017 #2
John Conyers is in the House of Representatives. He cannot introduce QC Sep 2017 #3
Thank you HarmonyRockets Sep 2017 #6
Sentate has already voted on single-payer health care - no lawmakers from either party voted for it factfinder_77 Sep 2017 #7
Yes, that was a stunt bill that people had the good sense not to vote for. n/t QC Sep 2017 #14
Thanks for the explanation TubbersUK Sep 2017 #10
We have a strange system in this country, and that's only part of it. QC Sep 2017 #16
The cartoon has been updated Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #24
Excellent! QC Sep 2017 #28
Thanks for that! beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #18
list of cosponsors Brother Buzz Sep 2017 #4
WOW! That's exactly what I had on my mind--a R B Garr Sep 2017 #22
I should have added the link Brother Buzz Sep 2017 #23
Thanks, again. The bill title: Expanded & Improved Medicare for All R B Garr Sep 2017 #25
The House of Representatives and the Senate are separate bodies. n/t QC Sep 2017 #29
Single payer is single payer. Both submit bills. Quit trying to make it R B Garr Sep 2017 #30
Loves me some Rep. Conyers shenmue Sep 2017 #5
Comparison of Conyers and Sanders/McDermott Bills factfinder_77 Sep 2017 #8
So the Sanders/McDermott bill is far more detailed. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #12
conyers is not a self promoter. facts suffice nt msongs Sep 2017 #9
aren't all politicians, almost by definition, self-promoters? Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #13
Not many shrinking violets in politics. n/t QC Sep 2017 #15
With over half her conference for it, why is Pelosi against it? marylandblue Sep 2017 #11
Great news -- turns into an occasion for Sanders-sniping on DU. philly_bob Sep 2017 #17
Some people think that last year's message board drama QC Sep 2017 #19
OR people are sick and tired of Democrats being R B Garr Sep 2017 #21
We should start 117 threads to thank each of these good Democrats R B Garr Sep 2017 #20
It's happening! Not Ruth Sep 2017 #26
It helps to have a plan in each chamber RandySF Sep 2017 #27
Listen to what he has to say HarmonyRockets Sep 2017 #31

lindysalsagal

(20,666 posts)
1. At this point 45 is so lost in the woods, and so desperate for any kind of win
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:34 PM
Sep 2017

I'm shocked that I'm thinking this might actually happen: 45 could shame the gop into adopting a dem program.

Wierd. World.

QC

(26,371 posts)
3. John Conyers is in the House of Representatives. He cannot introduce
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:43 PM
Sep 2017

a bill into the Senate. (The House and Senate are two separate bodies.) Only a senator can introduce a bill into the Senate. Bernie Sanders is a Senator. He can introduce bills in the Senate.

The normal procedure is to pass a bill in each chamber and then reconcile them in what is known as a "conference committee." Then both houses vote on the conference committee's bill.

More info here:

 

factfinder_77

(841 posts)
7. Sentate has already voted on single-payer health care - no lawmakers from either party voted for it
Reply to QC (Reply #3)
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:50 PM
Sep 2017

The Senate voted down a single-payer health care amendment introduced by Republican Senator Steve Daines on Thursday, in a political gambit aimed at putting Senate Democrats on the record on a divisive issue. The amendment failed to pass after no lawmakers from either party voted for it. Fifty-seven Senators voted against the amendment, while 43 voted simply “present.” Four Democrats voted against the amendment: Senators Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Jon Tester of Montana.

Daines’s amendment was far from a true test of Democratic support for single payer, however. Senator Bernie Sanders, the most popular progressive politician in the United States who supports a single-payer health-care system, denounced the amendment as a “political trick” designed “to embarrass Democrats,” ahead of the vote. His office had previously announced that even he would not be voting for it, giving Senate Democrats cover to reject the amendment as a political ploy.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/congress-healthcare-single-payer-debate/535143/

TubbersUK

(1,439 posts)
10. Thanks for the explanation
Reply to QC (Reply #3)
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:54 PM
Sep 2017

I've been following the developments re single payer with interest.

The OP led me to doubt what I knew re the legislative process.

QC

(26,371 posts)
16. We have a strange system in this country, and that's only part of it.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:20 PM
Sep 2017

The Electoral College is the one that really makes no sense whatsoever.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
18. Thanks for that!
Reply to QC (Reply #3)
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:56 PM
Sep 2017

We really need to start making civics classes mandatory again.

Love Schoolhouse Rock!

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
4. list of cosponsors
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 05:44 PM
Sep 2017

* = Original cosponsor

I'm happy to see my Congressman is on the list as an original cosponsor

Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Clark, Katherine M. [D-MA-5]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Clay, Wm. Lacy [D-MO-1]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Clyburn, James E. [D-SC-6]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Cummings, Elijah E. [D-MD-7]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Ellison, Keith [D-MN-5]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Engel, Eliot L. [D-NY-16]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Grijalva, Raul M. [D-AZ-3]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-33]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D-CA-40]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Scott, Robert C. "Bobby" [D-VA-3]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Serrano, Jose E. [D-NY-15]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Jeffries, Hakeem S. [D-NY-8]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Welch, Peter [D-VT-At Large]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Napolitano, Grace F. [D-CA-32]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Brady, Robert A. [D-PA-1]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-17]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Lawrence, Brenda L. [D-MI-14]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Garamendi, John [D-CA-3]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-19]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Nolan, Richard M. [D-MN-8]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]* 01/24/2017
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [D-GA-4]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-10]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Doyle, Michael F. [D-PA-14]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]* 01/24/2017
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]* 01/24/2017
Rep. Gutierrez, Luis V. [D-IL-4] 02/02/2017
Rep. Yarmuth, John A. [D-KY-3] 02/02/2017
Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7] 02/02/2017
Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1] 02/02/2017
Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25] 02/02/2017
Rep. Lowenthal, Alan S. [D-CA-47] 02/03/2017
Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8] 02/14/2017
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] 02/14/2017
Rep. Speier, Jackie [D-CA-14] 02/28/2017
Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-2] 02/28/2017
Rep. Capuano, Michael E. [D-MA-7] 03/08/2017
Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1] 03/08/2017
Rep. Fudge, Marcia L. [D-OH-11] 03/09/2017
Rep. Bass, Karen [D-CA-37] 03/10/2017
Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18] 03/16/2017
Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26] 03/16/2017
Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1] 03/16/2017
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5] 03/16/2017
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12] 03/22/2017
Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13] 03/22/2017
Rep. Barragan, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44] 03/22/2017
Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7] 03/28/2017
Rep. Payne, Donald M., Jr. [D-NJ-10] 03/28/2017
Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24] 03/29/2017
Rep. Gabbard, Tulsi [D-HI-2] 03/29/2017
Rep. DeFazio, Peter A. [D-OR-4] 04/03/2017
Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14] 04/03/2017
Rep. Green, Gene [D-TX-29] 04/03/2017
Rep. Price, David E. [D-NC-4] 04/03/2017
Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1] 04/03/2017
Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-20] 04/03/2017
Rep. Brown, Anthony G. [D-MD-4] 04/03/2017
Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7] 04/03/2017
Rep. Sarbanes, John P. [D-MD-3] 04/05/2017
Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] 04/05/2017
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6] 04/05/2017
Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46] 04/05/2017
Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1] 04/05/2017
Rep. McNerney, Jerry [D-CA-9] 04/05/2017
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12] 04/06/2017
Rep. Gallego, Ruben [D-AZ-7] 04/06/2017
Rep. Loebsack, David [D-IA-2] 04/06/2017
Rep. Polis, Jared [D-CO-2] 04/17/2017
Rep. Sablan, Gregorio Kilili Camacho [D-MP-At Large] 04/17/2017
Rep. Perlmutter, Ed [D-CO-7] 04/17/2017
Rep. Gonzalez, Vicente [D-TX-15] 04/17/2017
Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9] 04/17/2017
Rep. Sanchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38] 04/20/2017
Rep. Boyle, Brendan F. [D-PA-13] 04/25/2017
Rep. Lawson, Al, Jr. [D-FL-5] 04/25/2017
Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-15] 04/25/2017
Rep. Cooper, Jim [D-TN-5] 04/25/2017
Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-5] 04/25/2017
Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43] 04/28/2017
Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9] 04/28/2017
Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-6] 04/28/2017
Rep. Visclosky, Peter J. [D-IN-1] 04/28/2017
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8] 05/16/2017
Rep. Deutch, Theodore E. [D-FL-22] 05/16/2017
Rep. Crowley, Joseph [D-NY-14] 05/23/2017
Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33] 05/24/2017
Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA-28] 06/22/2017
Rep. Lowey, Nita M. [D-NY-17] 07/12/2017
Rep. Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [D-GA-2] 07/17/2017
Rep. Gomez, Jimmy [D-CA-34] 07/28/2017
Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-30] 08/18/2017

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
22. WOW! That's exactly what I had on my mind--a
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:53 AM
Sep 2017

comprehensive list of good Democrats who have signed on to Conyers bill.

Looks good, thank you.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
25. Thanks, again. The bill title: Expanded & Improved Medicare for All
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 11:05 AM
Sep 2017

And it's been introduced for over a decade, so thanks to all these good Democrats for their visionary efforts. This is how laws are made.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
30. Single payer is single payer. Both submit bills. Quit trying to make it
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 04:05 PM
Sep 2017

seem like Sanders is superior to other good Democrats. Lots of Democrats have supported single payer for many years.

John Conyers has been submitting a single payer bill for YEARS. It's not like no one has ever thought of this before.

Voltaire2

(13,009 posts)
12. So the Sanders/McDermott bill is far more detailed.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:46 PM
Sep 2017

Interesting as it is being attacked here for being completely lacking in detail.

Thanks for posting. Of course there are differences, but the general outline of each bill is very similar. And of course one is for the house and one for the senate, another fact which seems to have escaped some posters.

Voltaire2

(13,009 posts)
13. aren't all politicians, almost by definition, self-promoters?
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:49 PM
Sep 2017

Do book tours count?

How about we look at the cascade of support in our party for single-payer and stop fighting the primaries and get on board with a unified agenda for the 2018 elections?

Huh?

philly_bob

(2,419 posts)
17. Great news -- turns into an occasion for Sanders-sniping on DU.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 07:27 PM
Sep 2017

Two slightly different Democratic ideas of how to fix American health care. That's how things get done.

QC

(26,371 posts)
19. Some people think that last year's message board drama
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 10:54 PM
Sep 2017

is more important than things like winning the upcoming midterm elections, making people's lives better, etc.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
21. OR people are sick and tired of Democrats being
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:51 AM
Sep 2017

thrown under the bus and just flat out lied about.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
20. We should start 117 threads to thank each of these good Democrats
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 01:47 AM
Sep 2017

individually.

Then multiply that for all the years Conyers submitted his single payer bill.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Conyers, Expanded & ...