Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump spokeswoman's claims about Comey don't make legal sense.
Link to tweet
The Hapless Smear Campaign Against Jim Comey
The White House is making legal arguments about the former FBI director that barely pass the laugh test.
By BRADLEY P. MOSS -- September 13, 2017
From the moment Steve Bannon stated in his 60 Minutes interview that President Donald Trumps decision to fire former FBI Director James Comey was the biggest political mistake in modern presidential history, there simply was no chance that this week would proceed without a fair amount of political insanity. The fact that the presidents former chief strategist would publicly and brazenly disparage that decision was bound to result in a fierce White House pushback. And so it has. But over the past three days, the White House has repeatedly advanced flawed and in some instances preposterous legal arguments that dont stand up to informed scrutiny.
The hijinks began on Monday, when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders claimed that information divulged after Comey was fired served as retroactive justification for the presidents decision. She alleged, among other things, that Comey had given false testimony and leaked privileged information to journalists. On Tuesday, Sanders did not repeat the false testimony claim, but she did reiterate the assertion that Comey had leaked privileged government information and speculated that his actions could have been illegal.
In Wednesdays news briefing, reading from what appeared to be prepared notes, Sanders explained what she meant by illegal:
The memos that Comey leaked were created on an FBI computer while he was the director, she said. He claims they were private property, but they clearly followed the protocol of an official FBI document, leaking FBI memos on a sensitive case regardless of classification violates federal laws including the Privacy Act, standard FBI employment agreement and nondisclosure agreement all personnel must sign.
These talking points were presumably provided to Sanders by the White House Counsels Office, but ..............
The White House is making legal arguments about the former FBI director that barely pass the laugh test.
By BRADLEY P. MOSS -- September 13, 2017
From the moment Steve Bannon stated in his 60 Minutes interview that President Donald Trumps decision to fire former FBI Director James Comey was the biggest political mistake in modern presidential history, there simply was no chance that this week would proceed without a fair amount of political insanity. The fact that the presidents former chief strategist would publicly and brazenly disparage that decision was bound to result in a fierce White House pushback. And so it has. But over the past three days, the White House has repeatedly advanced flawed and in some instances preposterous legal arguments that dont stand up to informed scrutiny.
The hijinks began on Monday, when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders claimed that information divulged after Comey was fired served as retroactive justification for the presidents decision. She alleged, among other things, that Comey had given false testimony and leaked privileged information to journalists. On Tuesday, Sanders did not repeat the false testimony claim, but she did reiterate the assertion that Comey had leaked privileged government information and speculated that his actions could have been illegal.
In Wednesdays news briefing, reading from what appeared to be prepared notes, Sanders explained what she meant by illegal:
The memos that Comey leaked were created on an FBI computer while he was the director, she said. He claims they were private property, but they clearly followed the protocol of an official FBI document, leaking FBI memos on a sensitive case regardless of classification violates federal laws including the Privacy Act, standard FBI employment agreement and nondisclosure agreement all personnel must sign.
These talking points were presumably provided to Sanders by the White House Counsels Office, but ..............
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1333 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump spokeswoman's claims about Comey don't make legal sense. (Original Post)
L. Coyote
Sep 2017
OP
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)1. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is a fucking liar.
Which is why she was hired.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)3. The truth bit her on the butt and did not know what it was
underpants
(182,623 posts)2. It's simply for talk radio and Fox News purposes
They know it's not going anywhere so they repeat it so it can be repeated. RW'ers will KNOW it to be true and then feel like victims when it goes bust.