General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe stupidity that passed across my Facebook page today.
'Cause only 'Muricans would have the guns.
And no holes would be shot through the fuselage of an airliner traveling at 30,000.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Yep, and now 35 million of us believe it happened.
I keep telling you, and others, this was DONE and OVER when McConnell violated the constitution and illegally prevented a SC seat appointment.
What are YOU going to do, what am I going to do, what are WE going to do when, not if, gay marriage and abortion is outlawed?
Here is the point, most of us wont tolerate that, but our options will be limited, could get ugly.
Throck
(2,520 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)If the victims of that flight had guns on them they would still be alive?
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)Beartracks
(12,814 posts)Plus, for people who don't want to restrict guns to anyone at all, regardless of criminal background or mental stability, they have a very unrealistic fantasy that only good and stable people will have guns.
===========
unblock
(52,227 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)Capperdan
(492 posts)I'm frequently asking myself why I signed up for FB. So glad I'm not on Twitter.
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)But I'm not actually that worried about holes in the fuselage. My understanding is that one of the reasons Marshals get to carry guns is that bullet-sized holes will depressurize the plane slowly enough to allow a safe descent. Now, the passengers, crew, engines, fuel tanks, and controls, OTOH, are a different story.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Circular firing squad right there.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I guess too many logical thoughts crashing into each other is hazardous to your brain.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)Overcompensating yet still powerless. So limp.