Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
1. It's a beautiful metaphor for our fears and insecurities that will hold us back and
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 10:30 PM
Sep 2017

Eventually kill us if we let it get the better. And that if we allow these fears to divide us, it will eventually, absolutely take over.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
2. It's topical because we have a monstrous clown in the white house, but...
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 10:33 PM
Sep 2017

they've been trying to get a feature film version of "It" off the ground since 2009.

a kennedy

(29,642 posts)
3. I guess I'm just not intelligent or smart enough to see it......
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 10:36 PM
Sep 2017

I did not enjoy the new "It" at all......JMHO.

Glamrock

(11,794 posts)
7. Yeah man,
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 11:33 PM
Sep 2017

Most of his movies are pretty good, but the made for tv mini series always suck. I'm looking at you, "The Stand"....

kcr

(15,315 posts)
12. I think it's because Steven King himself is usually behind the mini-series.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 06:27 AM
Sep 2017

He's a great author but bad at translating them to the screen. The best movies based on his books are done by someone else.

ecstatic

(32,677 posts)
5. It reminded me of the 80s movies, which makes sense since that's the era
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 11:10 PM
Sep 2017

the movie takes place in. It felt nostalgic, but I couldn't get my head back into that space. It seems like the target age group might be millennials who have never really experienced the 80s movies (ET, Gremlins, etc).

a kennedy

(29,642 posts)
9. and back in that time frame...no kids I knew swore like that....
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 12:15 AM
Sep 2017

sorry......didn't think that was appropriate at all. JMHO. The first "It" didn't have to push all the realities that this version did. I enjoyed the innuendoes of the first version, NOT the graphic images of this one, and again JMHO.

 

bdtrppr6

(796 posts)
10. actually
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 01:51 AM
Sep 2017

i learned a lot of my cursing skills in the early 80's reading Stephen King books. Salem's Lot is my favorite of his, scared the living shit out of me when i was a kid. don't know. we cursed like sailors. once we learned "fuck", that was it.

Quixote1818

(28,926 posts)
8. I am just not into horror. Didn't scare me at all, however I did love the ending
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 11:41 PM
Sep 2017

and I did enjoy the dynamic of each kids own demons being almost like a metaphor for IT. How by them sticking together "supporting one another" they could cope with "It" and beat it. Perhaps there is a lesson there for DU. Stop all the stupid infighting and stand up to "IT". That fucking dick head pretending to be president.

Ghost of Tom Joad

(1,354 posts)
13. I didn't find it scary either
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:18 AM
Sep 2017

The real IT were the kids parents, who all sucked. The film was more about family dynamics than real horror.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Stephen King pick THI...