Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 01:43 PM Sep 2017

The Key Question at the U.N.: What Does North Korea Want?




As President Donald Trump and other world leaders gather at the United Nations this week, a lot of important questions hang in the air, but none more important than this one: What does North Korea want?

That is, what is North Korea’s real goal in its relentless, reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons as well as missiles that can carry them as far as the United States? The answer will determine whether it’s even possible to push the country off the nuclear path at this point, or whether a strategy of regime change or containment of a nuclear-armed country is the most realistic option—or, most ominously, whether armed conflict is likely.

The international community is, of course, casting about for ways to deter North Korea, and U.S. officials say there will be conversations this week about imposing more-severe economic sanctions than the ones already implemented in a pair of U.N. Security Council resolutions this year. Chinese and Russian companies doing business with North Korea are likely targets.

...

If diplomacy ultimately can’t reverse the nuclear program, the U.S. and its allies likely will be looking at a long-term strategy of containing a nuclear-armed North Korea and all that entails: far more spending on missile-defense systems, a bigger American military presence in Asia, military buildups in Japan and South Korea, possibly the reintroduction of American tactical nuclear weapons into South Korea.

Such a containment strategy worked with the Soviet Union for half a century. It is an expensive and frightening proposition—though perhaps not as frightening as war on the Korean Peninsula.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-key-question-at-the-u-n-what-does-north-korea-want-1505750645
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Key Question at the U.N.: What Does North Korea Want? (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 OP
There aren't Jamaal510 Sep 2017 #1
What Does North Korea Want? sarisataka Sep 2017 #2
In five years the South would be as effed up and poor as the North. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #3
But Kim would have houses sarisataka Sep 2017 #4
Or a seat at the big boys table in the nuclear room, or leverage against hostile trading blocs, or.. LanternWaste Sep 2017 #5
Kim knows the United States has never invaded a nation that has nuclear weapons. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #6
North Korea's ultimate goal sarisataka Sep 2017 #7
All I see is WW3 DaveBarton Sep 2017 #8
money Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #9
I don't know why "to be taken seriously" is so hard to understand. WhiskeyGrinder Sep 2017 #10
what exactly does "taken seriously" mean? Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #11

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
1. There aren't
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:05 PM
Sep 2017

many good options in this situation, it seems. Kim Jong Un is intent on continuing his tests, and the past few U.S. administrations have been unable to make them curtail their nuclear program, but I guess they appear to be handling it OK in working to economically-cripple North Korea with the sanctions and looking at missile defense spending. I just wish that Trump et al. would shut up with the "Rocket Man" and "he's begging for war" talk. They don't need to continue going out there and trying to make that man even more upset.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
5. Or a seat at the big boys table in the nuclear room, or leverage against hostile trading blocs, or..
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:20 PM
Sep 2017

Or a seat at the big boys table in the nuclear room, or leverage against hostile trading blocs, or...

It seems rather short-sighted to reduce the answer to merely one of many possibilities. But dogma and bias often reduces us to a much more narrow realm of ideas.

sarisataka

(18,501 posts)
7. North Korea's ultimate goal
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 04:51 PM
Sep 2017

Is reunification of the peninsula. Everything they do is viewed as a step towards that objective.

If a person looks at all those trees they can see a forest

 

DaveBarton

(3 posts)
8. All I see is WW3
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 06:44 PM
Sep 2017

This guy has taken missiles to be balloon filled with water. He careless of how many people that may end up been victims.
He has all it takes to make away with ISIS but yet won't employ that.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,309 posts)
10. I don't know why "to be taken seriously" is so hard to understand.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 06:48 PM
Sep 2017

They're not going to get rid of their nuclear weapons; it's the only card they've got. And it's a card that makes people listen. We should have talked with them during the years of "strategic patience." Now we're in a much weaker position, and we HAVE to talk with them.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. what exactly does "taken seriously" mean?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:05 PM
Sep 2017

They want money. Pure and simple.

They have few exports and not enough arable land to feed their people. They were supported by the Soviets while the USSR still existed, now they aren't.

To top it all off, they have a totalitarian nightmare where 99% of the citizenry are oppressed and starved by a small group at the top. So the people at the top exist in a state of both unimaginable luxury (by North Korean standards) but also constant paranoia.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Key Question at the U...