Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking - NYT says Mannafort to be indicted (Original Post) mnmoderatedem Sep 2017 OP
Still big big news triron Sep 2017 #1
YES IT IS!!!!! pnwmom Sep 2017 #2
Has Herr Trump pardoned him yet? Orrex Sep 2017 #3
An 11-year Pence presidency is not constitutionally possible jmowreader Sep 2017 #13
Nice--thank you for the detail. Orrex Sep 2017 #17
I don't see that greeny2323 Sep 2017 #4
Tweety says prosecutors informed Mannafort they plan in indicting him. mnmoderatedem Sep 2017 #7
link here deminks Sep 2017 #5
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Sep 2017 #6
The thread title is not justified by the NYT article n/t greeny2323 Sep 2017 #8
That's not exactly what it says. Ms. Toad Sep 2017 #9
Manafort has been given notice. Dawson Leery Sep 2017 #10
Why would you 'warn' someone that they were going to be indicted? trof Sep 2017 #11
To try to get them to turn DonaldsRump Sep 2017 #14
Thanks. You can see that I'm new at this. trof Sep 2017 #18
WHOA! Karma, wow, a man devoted primetime air time to maligning a woman's R B Garr Sep 2017 #12
Fake mews!!! Tiggeroshii Sep 2017 #15
The Hill reports also - "Mueller warned Manafort to expect an indictment" procon Sep 2017 #16

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
3. Has Herr Trump pardoned him yet?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:16 PM
Sep 2017

This is what concerns me about the Mueller investigation. Unless he scoops up Trump and Pence, one or the other will simply pardon everyone, declare victory, and enjoy a bulletproof presidency for the rest of the term--potentially an 11-year Pence presidency.

If he doesn't nab Trump, I'd almost prefer that he hadn't bothered in the first place.

jmowreader

(50,543 posts)
13. An 11-year Pence presidency is not constitutionally possible
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:34 PM
Sep 2017

The rules of succession are solidly encased in the Constitution:

Trump began the Reign of Terror on January 20, 2017.

If he is removed AFTER January 21, 2019, Pence can run for two terms of his own.

If he is removed on January 20, 2019, or before, Pence can only run for one term of his own.

What I think is happening is very simple: Pence ideally wants to be a two-term president. He does not want to go down in history as the first president to be restricted to one term. And so, Congress is going to do everything it can to minimize the damage Trump can cause in two years, largely by bringing in bills that have no possibility of getting through Congress. Once January 21, 2019, passes, Pence can safely 25th Amendment Trump into the gentle caresses of one Eric Schneiderman, Two Scoops' favorite state attorney general.

This doesn't mean we're not going to lose Obamacare. But I think they won't do it UNLESS they can figure out a way to make sure the Democratic Party takes the blame for it.

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
17. Nice--thank you for the detail.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 09:04 PM
Sep 2017

In all the discussions of impeachment and the 25th, I haven't seen a summation as clean or clear as yours.

mnmoderatedem

(3,722 posts)
7. Tweety says prosecutors informed Mannafort they plan in indicting him.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:20 PM
Sep 2017

no details yet. For whatever that's worth.

deminks

(11,014 posts)
5. link here
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:16 PM
Sep 2017

With a Picked Lock and a Threatened Indictment, Mueller’s Inquiry Sets a Tone

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/us/politics/mueller-russia-investigation.html

WASHINGTON — Paul J. Manafort was in bed early one morning in July when federal agents bearing a search warrant picked the lock on his front door and raided his Virginia home. They took binders stuffed with documents and copied his computer files, looking for evidence that Mr. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, set up secret offshore bank accounts. They even photographed the expensive suits in his closet.

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, then followed the house search with a warning: His prosecutors told Mr. Manafort they planned to indict him, said two people close to the investigation.

The moves against Mr. Manafort are just a glimpse of the aggressive tactics used by Mr. Mueller and his team of prosecutors in the four months since taking over the Justice Department’s investigation into Russia’s attempts to disrupt last year’s election, according to lawyers, witnesses and American officials who have described the approach. Dispensing with the plodding pace typical of many white-collar investigations, Mr. Mueller’s team has used what some describe as shock-and-awe tactics to intimidate witnesses and potential targets of the inquiry.

(end snip)

Ms. Toad

(34,055 posts)
9. That's not exactly what it says.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:25 PM
Sep 2017
WASHINGTON — Paul J. Manafort was in bed early one morning in July when federal agents bearing a search warrant picked the lock on his front door and raided his Virginia home. They took binders stuffed with documents and copied his computer files, looking for evidence that Mr. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, set up secret offshore bank accounts. They even photographed the expensive suits in his closet.

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, then followed the house search with a warning: His prosecutors told Mr. Manafort they planned to indict him, said two people close to the investigation.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/us/politics/mueller-russia-investigation.html?_r=0

In July (in the past), prosecutors told him they planned to indict him.

That doesn't mean it won't happen - but it isn't a statement that they currently (present tense) plan to indict him in the future. Even if something was planned in July, it may no longer be planned. It could also just as easily be a threat in connection with execution of the subpoenas to coerce cooperation (which the article pretty much implies).

trof

(54,256 posts)
11. Why would you 'warn' someone that they were going to be indicted?
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:26 PM
Sep 2017

Doesn't make sense to me.
Don't you just show up with the warrant and they do the perp walk?

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)
14. To try to get them to turn
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 08:10 PM
Sep 2017

Who really gives a sh*t about Paul Manafort when there are much, much bigger fish out there?

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
12. WHOA! Karma, wow, a man devoted primetime air time to maligning a woman's
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:28 PM
Sep 2017

character, and he is the real POS.

Wow,

procon

(15,805 posts)
16. The Hill reports also - "Mueller warned Manafort to expect an indictment"
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 08:22 PM
Sep 2017

Prosecutors on special counsel Robert Mueller's team reportedly told former Trump campaign manager Paul that they planned to indict him while they raided his Virginia home in July.

The warning, allegedly a shock-and-awe tactic, came as federal agents combed through his computer files, documents and any other potential pieces of evidence that could help them in their federal investigation, The New York Times reported Monday, citing two people close to the investigation.

The jarring comment is part of the approach Mueller and his team have embraced since May when the Justice Department named them to lead the high-profile investigation earlier, which aims to intimidate witnesses and possible targets of the probe, the newspaper reported.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/351268-nyt-mueller-warned-manafort-to-expect-an-indictment




Welcome to MacMuellers Burger Palace, we're open all night!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking - NYT says Manna...