Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Wed Sep 20, 2017, 09:10 AM Sep 2017

Under latest health-care bill, red states would benefit disproportionately


By David Weigel September 20 at 6:00 AM


At its core, the bill introduced by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) would implement a decades-old conservative concept, capping the amount that taxpayers spend on Medicaid and giving states full control over the program. As he’s sold the legislation to conservative governors and activists, Graham has described it as a possible triumph for federalism, and a way to end the progressive dream of universal health care managed from Washington.


What’s new, thanks to the Affordable Care Act, is a discrepancy in state-by-state funding that would be flattened out by the block grants. Most states used the ACA’s funding to expand Medicaid; some Republican-run states, liberated by the Supreme Court’s decision to make the funding optional, did not. As a result, 14 of the 15 states that would stand to gain from block grants are run by Republicans; Democratic megastates including California, New York and Massachusetts would lose billions of dollars, a feature both Graham and Cassidy have talked up to conservatives.

“We will either have to kick hundreds of thousands of people off of health care, or we will have to dramatically increase taxes,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), in one of a string of Monday night floor speeches by Democrats.

“No longer will four blue states get 40 percent of the money,” said Graham to Breitbart. “A state like Mississippi, they get a 900 percent increase. South Carolina gets 300 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/under-latest-health-care-bill-red-states-would-benefit-disproportionately/2017/09/19/fe26e61a-9cb3-11e7-9083-fbfddf6804c2_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_redstates-735a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.55e459784f0a



Apparently, Republicans love them some redistribution of wealth.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Under latest health-care bill, red states would benefit disproportionately (Original Post) octoberlib Sep 2017 OP
Yes, this is what is called buying votes and have read that have been doing it BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #1
Just give some medicaid money to red states who turned it down when it was called Obamacare greymattermom Sep 2017 #2
Well son, ya see this here money ya givin' me now - it's comin' from a white man's hand... CincyDem Sep 2017 #3

BigmanPigman

(51,590 posts)
1. Yes, this is what is called buying votes and have read that have been doing it
Wed Sep 20, 2017, 09:20 AM
Sep 2017

since the July vote. This bill (Graham Cassidy)was crafted before the McCain NO vote repeal. They just never got around to it then. They are buying votes by taking money from the blue states to pay as bribes for a NO vote this time to the GOP senators.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
2. Just give some medicaid money to red states who turned it down when it was called Obamacare
Wed Sep 20, 2017, 09:30 AM
Sep 2017

and leave the rest of the states as is. Call it Trumpcare and be done with it. The next president can make some improvements and we'll call it nextpresidentcare.

CincyDem

(6,356 posts)
3. Well son, ya see this here money ya givin' me now - it's comin' from a white man's hand...
Wed Sep 20, 2017, 09:35 AM
Sep 2017


...that Obamacare money, well...ya see it's been touched by a black man's hand and, well...ya know...we just can't have a white man in South Carolina takin' hand outs from a black man. Just ain't right, ya see what I'm sayin'.




These guys are such asshats.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Under latest health-care ...