General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump: GOP health bill short of votes before deadline
By Erica Werner ASSOCIATED PRESS SEPTEMBER 20, 2017
WASHINGTON President Trump said Wednesday the Republicans last-resort Obamacare repeal effort remains two or three votes short, forecasting days of furious lobbying ahead with a crucial deadline looming next week.
The legislation by Senators Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina would repeal major pillars of former president Barack Obamas health law, replacing them with block grants to states to design their own health care programs. Majority leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky is trying to round up 50 votes to pass the legislation before Sept. 30, when special rules preventing a Democratic filibuster will expire.
We think this has a very good chance, Obamacare is only getting worse, Trump told reporters covering the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, as he prepared to meet Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi. At some point the Senate is going to be forced to make a deal. By his reckoning, were at 47 or 48 already, senators, and a lot of others are looking at it very positively.
Trumps comments came several hours after McConnells office announced that the majority leaders intention is to bring the legislation to the Senate floor next week, a question McConnell was noncommittal on a day earlier. After the embarrassing defeat of an earlier repeal bill in July, some Republicans believe McConnell would bring a bill to the floor only with the votes in hand.
more
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2017/09/20/trump-gop-health-bill-short-votes-before-deadline/ojNHBz3bdo7m5SETk9m1yK/story.html
no_hypocrisy
(46,057 posts)Or it doesn't matter which one?
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)Three or more votes is more difficult.
spanone
(135,802 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,374 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Can't believe she would sign on to losing pre-existing conditions protection.
sweetroxie
(776 posts)into believing that the right of states to oversee the preexisting conditions means that there is support for preexisting conditions where there is not.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)My guess is that she is a firm NO.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,577 posts)Does he even know what the ACA says, or how it works? Does he even care? He's gotten used to parroting it as an applause line at his campaign rallies. The deplorables, drunk with power from the 2016 election, roar their approval without once stopping to think how the GOP "plan" will annihilate their family finances, and possibly even kill those they love.
ACA can and should be improved, not repealed. The Repugs are like someone who gets rid of their new BMW because the ashtray is full.