General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, under Graham-Cassidy what happens to their health ins. when people move from CA to MS?
Is there anything in the amendment that provides protections for portability?
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Or what happens to people like me....
I live in Indiana, but my company is in Maryland.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,434 posts)Graham-Cassidy has NOTHING to do with health care, and everything to do with shifting Medicaid and ACA subsidies to TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)That's what happens to them.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)It isn't a question of portability so much as the amount of the State's block grant as determined by one unknown person.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,756 posts)I keep waiting to hear questions like this on TV. The whole reason they want to give block grants to the states is that their long term strategy is to weaken the financial stability of blue states. When people who need Medicaid realize that their red state will mercilessly withhold that care from them, they will soon realize that they need to move to a blue state to get health care. Of course when all the sick people move to blue states, and an inordinate amount of their budgets must go towards paying for these health care costs.
Meanwhile the red states that realize the savings from their sick people moving out of the state can instead use those funds for such things as supporting tax abatements in order to encourage businesses to move to their state. Their economies are strengthened while blue state economies are weakened.
They can also use the savings to support certain ideological preferences that they have as well. For example additional funding for home schooling and private/religious education that will teach their children Republican values instead of, say, art or languages.
riversedge
(70,322 posts)Sucha NastyWoman
(2,756 posts)for the rich.
I think it is also, and more importantly, about increasing Republican power.