Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, under Graham-Cassidy what happens to their health ins. when people move from CA to MS? (Original Post) haveahart Sep 2017 OP
A major flaw in this bill.... Adrahil Sep 2017 #1
They're screwed. That's what happens. Eyeball_Kid Sep 2017 #2
They're fucked NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #3
More complicated than that - DURHAM D Sep 2017 #4
That is what is at the center of it Sucha NastyWoman Sep 2017 #5
CA set to LOSE $78 BILLION, while MS will gain a few Billion.... riversedge Sep 2017 #6
I hear it said that this bill is not about health care - it's about freeing up funds for a tax cut Sucha NastyWoman Sep 2017 #7
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
1. A major flaw in this bill....
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:36 AM
Sep 2017

Or what happens to people like me....

I live in Indiana, but my company is in Maryland.

Eyeball_Kid

(7,434 posts)
2. They're screwed. That's what happens.
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:36 AM
Sep 2017

Graham-Cassidy has NOTHING to do with health care, and everything to do with shifting Medicaid and ACA subsidies to TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY.

Sucha NastyWoman

(2,756 posts)
5. That is what is at the center of it
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 09:46 AM
Sep 2017

I keep waiting to hear questions like this on TV. The whole reason they want to give block grants to the states is that their long term strategy is to weaken the financial stability of blue states. When people who need Medicaid realize that their red state will mercilessly withhold that care from them, they will soon realize that they need to move to a blue state to get health care. Of course when all the sick people move to blue states, and an inordinate amount of their budgets must go towards paying for these health care costs.

Meanwhile the red states that realize the savings from their sick people moving out of the state can instead use those funds for such things as supporting tax abatements in order to encourage businesses to move to their state. Their economies are strengthened while blue state economies are weakened.

They can also use the savings to support certain ideological preferences that they have as well. For example additional funding for home schooling and private/religious education that will teach their children Republican values instead of, say, art or languages.

Sucha NastyWoman

(2,756 posts)
7. I hear it said that this bill is not about health care - it's about freeing up funds for a tax cut
Thu Sep 21, 2017, 10:50 AM
Sep 2017

for the rich.

I think it is also, and more importantly, about increasing Republican power.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, under Graham-Cassidy ...