General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat would the ideal Democratic candidate look like?
What would he/she believe in?
Would he/she be a leftist, a moderate, a conservative, an independent, a radical, a populist?
Or would he/she be a combination of all of the above?
There is no one candidate that is going to please everyone, in my opinion.
ATL Ebony
(1,097 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,780 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,840 posts)Democratic candidates should ideally be diverse as the US population.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)Presidents to serve two full terms in my lifetime. Both were young when they won. Oh yeah, both were relatively moderate. Those are the examples of good winning candidates.
dogman
(6,073 posts)What did we win?
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)Neither Clinton nor Obama appointed Gorsuch. I don't recall either one campaigning for Trump for that matter.
dogman
(6,073 posts)The others are our reality.
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)a response that you wanted to hear. I responded to the OP's question; so sorry if it didn't please you.
dogman
(6,073 posts)I read too much in to your post. By winning, I thought you meant the people. Apparently you meant the race. Yes' you answered what you wanted. I apologize for wanting more.
Willie Pep
(841 posts)It is because I am Catholic. Economically liberal/socially conservative is a good way to describe the Catholic position on political issues.
I think John Bel Edwards would be the contemporary politician who is closest to my ideal Democratic candidate right now. He is even Catholic like me.
CherokeeFiddle
(297 posts)Willie Pep
(841 posts)I don't really care about overturning gay marriage and I think marijuana should be legalized so I am not totally conservative on all social issues.
CherokeeFiddle
(297 posts)Eeeeks!
Willie Pep
(841 posts)I know that makes me an odd duck on DU but it is a religious thing for me. Still, I vote for the Democrats in every election since they are the more pro-life party in my opinion. When you get down to the practical issue of helping people sustain life the most important things are health care, jobs and anti-poverty programs. You can't say that you care about human beings in the womb but then kick them to the curb after they are born like the Republicans do.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,360 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,307 posts)maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)that'd be a good goal.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,307 posts)maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)ideological purity is most important.
"it's always darkest before the dawn".
SpicyBoi
(162 posts)NT
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)BainsBane
(53,012 posts)She is Steve Bannon and Fox's favorite "Democrat" for a reason.
This is Gabbart:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard#Social_issues_and_civil_rights
Then there is her undying admiration for the children-gassing Assad regime. You may have some sort of misconception that she's anti-war. She's not. She criticized Obama for the very same thing Trump does, not denouncing "Islamic extremism." She doesn't oppose US intervention. She simply loves RW dictators and criticized Obama for not bombing the rebels against Assad.
She has blasted President Obama for failing to talk about Islamic extremism. And she recently tweeted this criticism of the president's perceived weakness and hypocrisy in Syria:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/15/rep-tulsi-gabbard-the-democrat-that-republicans-love-and-the-dnc-cant-control/?utm_term=.8a84a9ca8011
SpicyBoi
(162 posts)Tulsi was an early supporter of Bernie Sanders and is anti-war. More than good enough for me.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)Yeah. Not exactly a shock.
SpicyBoi
(162 posts)Because if so, it seems we haven't learned anything from the Iraq War, Libya, literally everywhere...
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)Her own words conveyed in those tweets I posted show as much. She was pissed off at Obama for NOT BOMBING Syrian rebels. Being pro-Assad is not anti-war.
SpicyBoi
(162 posts)And neither should our party. Who are these moderate Syrian rebels?
dogman
(6,073 posts)It appears to win at this time, we need a populist. My preference is to the left since center has been driven so far to the right. Radical in the sense of willingness to embrace change as needed. Independent of the interests that support our opposition. Not researching at this time, just observing.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Young-ish (52), female, smart, minority . . . and she kicked the Nazi Elf's ass during the hearing in June. She's checking off all my boxes.
maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)That's an actual consideration for me.
It's a deliberate tactic used by Con Men like our President - if Bill died, he'd call Hillary "Crooked" in his condolence tweet.
HeartachesNhangovers
(814 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)HeartachesNhangovers
(814 posts)DeeDeeNY
(3,354 posts)The ones who will make great presidents are not necessarily the ones who also make great candidates. Running a successful campaign calls for a different set of traits.