Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
According to this article Trump may have committed a Federal crime telling the NFL to fire players (Original Post) leon8822 Sep 2017 OP
Trump's speech, while abhorrent, doesn't violate the plain wording of the law onenote Sep 2017 #1

onenote

(43,309 posts)
1. Trump's speech, while abhorrent, doesn't violate the plain wording of the law
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 07:33 AM
Sep 2017

First, for the law to apply, Trump would have had to demand that the NFL fire players based on their partisan political (i.e., party) affiliation. Trump didn't do that -- he didn't say fire all Democrats or even all Democrats that kneel during the anthem. And kneeling doesn't determine your "partisan political affiliation" -- presumably Trump would feel the same way about Independents, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens, etc. that knelt.

Second, the law only applies where the attempt to influence a private employment decision is made by taking or withholding (or threatening to take or withhold) an "official act" -- Trump didn't do that either.

Back in 2007, a United States Senator named Barack Obama suggested that CBS Radio had not gone far enough when it merely suspended Don Imus for racist comments he made. Obama's comments were lawful and in my opinion appropriate. Trump's comments also were lawful, but they were wildly inappropriate (like pretty much every single thing he says).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»According to this article...